WarStrike 85 Transcript
Thursday, March 13, 2025
Iran and Turkey are on the move since Assad’s fall, but as Striker explains, it’s turning out badly for Israel. Future US intervention in Syria is on the table. Pro-Trump white nationalists keep losing while sinking with Trump himself.
An empire in crisis is setting legal precedents on free speech after ICE kidnaps an anti-Israel
Columbia University professor in preparation for war with Iran.
Libertarian pushback on Trump compared to White Nationalists is exposing the Jewish iron fist in American politics more. Massie’s fate will decide if MAGA is a white populist movement or a trump celebrity cult. BRICS growing bolder with de-dollarization efforts. Belarus and Russia double down on agreements with Iran so the US will capitulate all of Eastern Europe to them out of fanaticism for Israel.
00:19:00 - Updates on Syria’s Internal Chaos
00:45:00 - More Rightoids Countersignaling National Socialism
00:53:00 - ICE Deportations Move Against Antisemites
01:07:00 - Laura Loomer Attacks Thomas Massie
01:30:00 - Kingsley Wilson & Jewish Distrust of its Political Mercenaries
01:52:00 - Jews Tell Trump to Withdraw Senior Intelligence Position from Dan Davis
02:11:15 - Unsustainable US Debt
02:18:00 - Belarus is Back; How Drones Affected the Ukraine War
2:46:45 - News Round Up: Sheryl Sandberg, Columbia U Expels Pro-Palestine Students, Open Genocide in Syria, Milei Opens Nazi Archives, Trump’s Environmental Deregulation, Immigration Raises Prices, Jim Jordan Brings More H-1B Visas
[00:00:01] - [Warren]: Greetings, war strikers. It is Thursday, March 13, 2025. I am Warren, the war in WarStrike. The strike will be with us in just a minute. Hope everybody is doing well and having a good week. I’m going to talk about our terrific sponsors, starting with our regular sponsors, Clemens & Blair Publishing, led by Dr. Thomas Dalton. You can find them at clemensonblair.com. These guys are great—fantastic. I always recommend the dual German-English version of Mein Kampf. I was referencing it this weekend. I have an older version from long ago that I like because I got used to its translation, but it’s very cumbersome—almost a word-for-word rendering of the original German. You’ll get paragraph-long run-on sentences that take a lot to sift through. Dr. Dalton’s translation is much more readable. It conveys the same ideas but breaks down Hitler’s massive sentences into smaller chunks, so it flows better in English. The nice thing is, you can look at the opposite page and see the original German, compare it, and—with AI and Google Translate out there—arrive at your own conclusions, like, “Did he really mean that?”
Somebody left a comment on our last show that I thought was really interesting. They said Joe and I were discussing Darre and his chapter on breeding in New Nobility of Blood and Soil. Part of the confusion with Darre stems from the fact that “breeding” is an imprecise translation of the word he uses, “Zucht.” That word has a more complex meaning than just “breeding.” Darre explores this in his book. For example, it’s used in “Unzucht,” which means engaging in degenerate sexual behavior, or in “Mannschaft,” which could translate to “obedience” or “discipline” in a military context. Often, when you dive into ideological or theoretical concepts, an inaccurate translation can change the entire meaning. In many cases, there’s no perfectly accurate translation. “Folk” is an English equivalent to the German “Volk,” but the meaning isn’t precise. The same goes for “Bauer,” a word Darre uses a lot, translated as “peasant” or “farmer” in English, though it carries a unique meaning in German.
This is why it’s so important. Some might think it’s a small matter or something only pedants would care about, but it’s not. It’s why the Catholic Church clung to Latin for centuries and why Islamic scholars still learn the Quran in Arabic. If you’re not engaging with the root language, you’re not getting the full picture. I’m not comparing National Socialism to Islam or Christianity, but any major ideological or philosophical concept demands understanding the meaning of these crucial words. That’s why I recommend, as I often do, the dual German-English edition of Mein Kampf from Clemens & Blair—it’s my favorite thing they publish. If, like me, you don’t speak German fluently, you can’t just read it in the original, but this edition helps you dig into the meat of it. They have many other books too. Use the coupon code WARSTRIKE10 for 10% off any orders. We hear from people all the time who’ve just placed another order with Clemens & Blair, and I love to see that. These guys deserve patronage.
Then we have armreg.co.uk, featuring Germar Rudolph and the finest Holocaust revisionists in the world pooling their resources. You can find so much here—you just have to dig through the catalog, which covers a lot of specific subjects. I pulled up one while browsing that I’ll highlight for the show: Holocaust Handbook, Volume 29: The Dissolution of Eastern European Jewry. Its description caught my eye: “Before the Second World War, Eastern Europe was the demographic center of world Jewry. After the war, only a fraction of it was left behind. What happened?” Mainstream narratives claim six million were gassed in chambers disguised as showers. But the author didn’t stop there—he thoroughly explored European population developments and shifts, mainly caused by emigration, deportations, and evacuations conducted by both Nazis and Soviets, among other factors. The book relies primarily on Jewish, Zionist, and mainstream sources. It concludes that a sizeable share of Jews missing from post-war local censuses—often counted as Holocaust victims—had either emigrated, mostly to Israel or the United States, or been deported by Stalin to Siberian labor camps.
This is the third edition of this classic, with a foreword by Professor A.R. Butts, an epilogue by Germar Rudolph, and recent updates by the author. Rudolph compares the study to a mainstream investigation into the numerical dimension of the Holocaust, published eight years after the book’s first edition and intended to refute it. Both studies reach similar conclusions about Jewish population losses in Nazi-ruled European countries, except for Poland and the Soviet Union, which housed the vast majority of the world’s Jews before the war. While the author dedicated most of his book to studying the demographic developments in those two countries, the mainstream study meant to counter him remains notably silent on them. In this new edition, he adds more arguments to his ongoing investigation of Jewish demographics in the former Soviet Union.
On a personal note, I often mention a good friend of mine who participated in the 1956 uprising in Budapest, Hungary. He was a kid when the Nazis and the Arrow Cross took power, and later when the Soviets did. He once told me about Jews he knew in his area who were there before the Nazis arrived—and then they just disappeared. Many never came back. He’s a Holocaust revisionist through and through, believing the gas chamber narrative is nonsense. So I asked him once, “You say the Holocaust didn’t happen, but you talk about Jews in your villages in Hungary who left and never returned. What happened?” He explained that millions were displaced in the war, and many died amid that chaos—some were older people, and there was widespread hunger and disease afterward. There’s a great book, Savage Continent, that paints a vivid picture of the total chaos in Central Europe at the close of World War II—mass murder, ethnic cleansing, starvation on an unimaginable scale, like Syria today. But many Jews who survived went to Israel or the United States. There’s no doubt the Nazis uprooted them and caused their departure—it’s just the idea of homicidal gas chambers that he finds implausible. Anyway, here’s Joe.
[00:09:12] - [Striker]: Hey.
[00:09:14] - [Warren]: Go to armreg.co.uk and use the coupon code WARSTRIKE15 for 15% off this and other books, or WARSTRIKE for 5% off their bundle groups, which are already generously discounted—I always mix those up. I was just talking about my Hungarian friend who knew Jews growing up in Hungary that were gone after the Nazis came in. I asked him, “You’re a Holocaust revisionist, but you mention local Jews who were either rounded up or left when the Nazis marched through and the Arrow Cross took power.” He said some probably died because Europe was in total chaos at the end of World War II.
[00:09:50] - [Striker]: Emphasis on the past tense.
[00:09:51] - [Warren]: They were gone after the Nazis came in.
[00:09:53] - [Striker]: A lot of Hungarians died too.
[00:10:19] - [Warren]: Yes, a lot of Hungarians died. Many Jews went to Israel or other places, but—
[00:10:21] - [Striker]: To America.
[00:10:27] - [Warren]: Just because a lot of Jews got uprooted doesn’t mean they were all sent to centers of mass death where they were systematically exterminated and their ashes disposed of.
[00:10:40] - [Striker]: As we’ve seen with Gaza, they have no qualms doing that to someone else. Why should anyone feel bad about uprooting them? The whole reason people used to feel bad was the moral dilemma of whether it was right. Well, they’ve answered that question—they do it when they’re the majority. From a pure, objective moral perspective, if we go by the golden rule, there’s nothing wrong with what they’re doing. Let’s not even get into what they’re doing to white countries with immigration.
[00:11:30] - [Warren]: Both can be true. The Jewish population in Europe shrunk massively after the Third Reich’s tour across the continent—there weren’t many left afterward. But that doesn’t mean—
[00:11:40] - [Striker]: In Europe.
[00:11:41] - [Warren]: —there were more Jews in the United States than in Israel afterward. It’s not so clear-cut.
[00:12:10] - [Striker]: Me going missing in the aftermath of World War II isn’t evidence of a genocide. Everyone was missing—tens of millions were displaced and disappeared from censuses. If you disappeared into the Soviet Union, you could’ve ended up anywhere. Then there were people going to America, Argentina, or Israel—those were the big destinations after the war. They’re still there.
[00:13:09] - [Warren]: I remember my aunt telling me that my great-grandmother, who left Hungary before the First World War, kept in touch with family back home. When the war happened and the Austro-Hungarian Empire broke up, they lost contact and never heard from them again. If I were Jewish and that was World War II, I’d say, “They perished in the Holocaust.”
[00:13:17] - [Striker]: “They died in the gas chambers in Auschwitz.”
[00:14:16] - [Warren]: People have no idea what was done to Central Europe. One thing that’s always bothered me, Joe, is the image of the end of World War II. I remember watching It’s a Wonderful Life and realizing this for the first time—they said George Bailey wept and prayed on V-E Day and V-J Day. There’s this idea that in May 1945, everybody was praying, “Thank God it’s over.” The iconic photo of the sailor kissing the nurse in Times Square reinforces this popular 20th-century perception that the end of World War II was all celebration. But I’ve spoken about Savage Continent several times—it describes a Syria-like chaos in Germany and Eastern Europe in May 1945 that lasted months, sometimes years. No civil society, no police, no medical services.
[00:14:19] - [Striker]: There’s a picture of me kissing a nurse on October 7th.
[00:14:23] - [Warren]: There’s a picture of me kissing Mark Coletto on October 7th because I was in the UK giving a conference. We didn’t publish it—it was an accident. We were overcome with excitement and then, as soon as it happened, we were like, “What are we doing?” But being outside the venue on October 7th was funny, like, “What’s going on?”
[00:15:30] - [Striker]: Apart from everything, maybe it doesn’t go as far as the Hutus and Tutsis—or maybe it does. Some of that stuff in Eastern Europe, even now—I didn’t think we still had that in us. It’s not a compliment. The sadism, hundreds of thousands of men dying—Eastern Europe is a rough place. That’s why when people say, “Hitler hated the Slavs,” it’s not that simple.
[00:15:51] - [Warren]: It’s like saying white people kill Black people. Black people kill far more Black people than white people do. What did the Slavs do when they had the upper hand on the Germans after the Potsdam Accord? They killed millions of women and children.
[00:16:07] - [Striker]: No, those were Czechs—Edward Benes did that. But it goes both ways—all ways. That’s why we should try to put that behind us. On some level, we never will, and that’s okay too. We just need to figure out how to live with each other and find compromises. Any narrative that’s just one side or the other is wrong.
[00:16:36] - [Warren]: My point is that for Americans, the end of World War II was people celebrating and warm fuzzies. In Europe, it wasn’t just Eastern Europe—France and Northern Italy too. The stuff they did in Northern Italy with collaborators—shaving heads, mass revenge killings—it was Syria times a thousand. What happened to our white people in Europe when the war ended was revenge on a massive scale—no trials, no cell phones. I have a book about what the Czechs did to Germans in Sudetenland at the war’s end—mass rapes, death, killing. If you’re Czech, you might say, “The Germans shouldn’t have been there,” but whatever. I hate that whitewashing of history, the sense that World War II ended and the world just moved on.
[00:16:58] - [Striker]: They didn’t even give you a Nuremberg Trial. They just lynched you.
[00:17:00] - [Warren]: Exactly.
[00:17:47] - [Striker]: Some of it doesn’t make sense. You resent German influence in your country, then open an American military base there? What is it? These things aren’t cut and dry. Why is an American base okay in Poland but not a German one? Explain that to me.
[00:18:15] - [Warren]: They were occupied by the Soviets.
[00:18:17] - [Striker]: When Russia was the big superpower, they had a base in Poland. You know why it’s called the Warsaw Pact? Poland was one of their superstars. Let’s be honest—these things are in flux. I’m not picking on Poles or Polish nationalism, but these stories have many sides.
[00:18:50] - [Warren]: When a whole government collapses—I sent you that video from Syria—thousands of innocent people have died since our last show.
[00:19:03] - [Striker]: It’s horrible. That’s our fault—not us, the White race, but the Jews who run America. Many of my outside-the-box predictions about Syria are coming true. The Russians will probably keep their base. The Iranians started a new Hezbollah-type militia in Syria to organize the Alawites who are being killed—they kill children, film it, and put it online, those sick animals. The Iranians are forming them into a Hezbollah-style unit where the Russian base is. They’ll either create a new country or a designated ethnic zone, but I don’t see the Iranians or Russians leaving. You know who I do see getting out? The US. Jewish foreign policy people are saying, “America can’t leave,” but it’s not up to them. The Turks are decimating Kurdish outposts in Syria where American bases are. They’ll either get out or make a deal with the Turks, who aren’t straightforward American puppets. Their approach to the Ukraine war is the most opportunistic thing I’ve ever seen—they sell weapons to Ukraine while boosting trade with Russia. That’s ultimate opportunism.
[00:21:20] - [Warren]: That’s bamboo diplomacy, but a bit too much.
[00:21:31] - [Striker]: They’re massively increasing the economies of Iran and Russia through trade while militarily supporting their enemies. This is what multi-polarity looks like.
[00:21:36] - [Warren]: I saw articles while prepping for the show about Israel and Turkey having issues in Syria. Israel keeps pushing for permanent buffer zones. This is from The New Arab a couple days ago: “Israel and Turkey: the showdown that could shape Syria’s future.” They’re the two main players to fill power vacuums in post-Assad Syria, and friction between Ankara and Tel Aviv is intensifying. Erdoğan’s powerful rhetoric has condemned Israel for years, but it was just talk. The situation in Syria since Bashar al-Assad’s regime fell last year has worsened Turkish-Israeli tensions. Analysts are asking if Erdoğan’s anti-Israel rhetoric might translate into something more.
[00:23:10] - [Striker]: This is shaping up badly for Israel. Turkey has always been a theoretical problem, and now they’re on their border. What Israel’s doing is realpolitik. Part of why Trump is being nice to Russia, at least on the surface, is because Israel is telling him they need to balance these belligerent actors in the Middle East. Since Russia and Turkey have geopolitical disputes, Israel thinks they can play them off each other. They’re saying letting Russia keep their base in Syria might not be a bad idea. If the Turks consolidate power in Syria under an Islamist government, that’s a problem for Israel. That’s what Israeli foreign policy people are saying, and I think America will acquiesce to it, to the extent they have a say. Israelis argue they need the Turks to have a foothold because Russia is Iran’s top sponsor—the biggest threat to Israel. After all the effort, money, and bloodshed the Jews put into regime change in Syria—billions of American dollars wasted, millions transferred to Europe—they’ve just replaced one problem with another.
[00:25:41] - [Warren]: Turkey has three million Syrian refugees they want to send back, creating areas for them to go. Israel seems intent on displacing more people, wanting a failed state in Syria—just chaos and mass death. That’s what Netanyahu and Tel Aviv want, and it’s directly against Turkey’s interests. Regardless of whether Erdoğan’s rhetoric about Palestinians is sincere—it’s pretty clear it’s not—just the issue of three million refugees, more than Gaza’s population, in Turkey makes it significant. A pro-Syria stability where refugees can go home would help Europe, versus an anti-Syria failed-state scenario where refugees flood Europe, hurting it. Articles today say if Syria destabilizes further, like Libya or Iraq in 2006-2008, more Syrian refugees will come to Europe despite Assad’s fall.
[00:27:05] - [Striker]: I’ll go out on a limb and say the United States will have to do something militarily in Syria at some point.
[00:27:22] - [Warren]: Oh, wow. You’ve gone out on a limb.
[00:27:26] - [Striker]: It’s not a guarantee, but I don’t see a scenario where America keeps its base. They’d have to make huge concessions to the Turks to keep their Kurdish assets. Some say if America leaves, Iran could arm the Kurds, but the Kurds said, “No, we’re 100% on team Jew—we’d rather die than take Iranian weapons.” America is their only sponsor. How do America and Turkey deal with this? The Turks say, “This is our red line with the Kurds.” America says, “We need them to stay in Syria forever.” This is the main problem. Maybe America will just leave.
[00:28:38] - [Warren]: Did you see IDF-approved plans for a three-zone occupation of Syrian territory up to Damascus? They call it a buffer zone, their new thing. It expands from Mount Hermon in the north to Tel Qudnah in the south, with seven new military outposts, including a permanent presence on Mount Hermon in the traditional demilitarized area—new bases, construction, permanent IDF presence, controlled civilian movement, work permits for Syrian Druze, full control over civilian life. Zone two is a 15-kilometer district control zone adjacent to the Golan Heights, a secondary security layer with IDF operations as needed and partial control over civilian life. Zone three, an influence zone, extends 65 kilometers to the Damascus-Sweida Road, includes Druze population centers, focuses on relationships with local communities, complete demilitarization south of Damascus, controlled crossings, and partial civilian rule. It’s a seemingly permanent occupation of Syria. I can’t imagine the Turks or anybody being okay with this—most significant decisions in the Israeli military.
[00:30:15] - [Striker]: The Jews are trying to undermine Turkey. At the G20 Summit last year, they talked about the Suez Canal and a Turkish corridor in the eastern Mediterranean. G20 countries want a new middle passage. The US plans a Belt and Road Initiative featuring India, the Middle East, and Eastern Europe, going around Turkey. China’s Belt and Road is good for China economically; America’s is good for Israel.
[00:31:15] - [Warren]: Is this the one Netanyahu showed at the UN? He presented a picture of it, saying it’s good versus—
[00:31:37] - [Striker]: Yes, I believe so.
[00:31:40] - [Warren]: Here it is—the curse versus—I’ve got it.
[00:31:51] - [Striker]: To have open access to the European market, Middle Eastern countries must accept Israel with formalized diplomatic ties to participate in America’s Belt and Road Initiative. Our country is disgusting—we do nothing for ourselves, everything is for Israel. This move is intended to isolate Turkey.
[00:32:14] - [Warren]: Here’s what he said: “Ladies and gentlemen, as Israel defends itself against Iran in the seven-front war, the line separating the blessing and the curse could not be clearer. This is the map I presented here last year. It’s a map of a blessing.”
[00:32:36] - [Striker]: “It shows Israel and its Arab partners forming a land bridge connecting Asia and Europe in the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. Across this bridge, we will lay rail lines, energy pipelines, fiber optic cables, serving the betterment of two billion people. Now, look at this second map. It’s a map of a curse—an arc of terror Iran has created and imposed from the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean. Iran’s malignant arc shuts down waterways, cuts off trade, destroys nations from within, and inflicts misery on millions. On one hand, a bright blessing, a future of hope. On the other, a dark future of despair. If you think this dark map is only a curse for Israel, think again.”
[00:33:56] - [Warren]: His blessing map stood out to me—it’s a built-in road issue. This is why people think the United States directs everything, but they didn’t ask Turkey. They’re going around Turkey on purpose because they’re not sure they can control it. I watched that whole speech, and it didn’t jump out at me at the time that Turkey is conspicuously absent from the map. It’s cut out of the deal. Another thing to watch is what they do with Egypt. They want to use Egypt as a pawn or cat’s paw of America. It’s a matter of whether the Egyptians will sign on. You can see they’re making it up as they go along—they don’t have a fixed plan because every plan goes awry.
I sent you an interesting breakdown of Egypt by a dissident socialist who marched with Arab nationalists, Islamists, and the Muslim Brotherhood during the Arab Spring. It was on Middle East Eye’s YouTube account—a fascinating breakdown by a smart guy. He said Egypt is under tighter control under Sisi than it was under Mubarak. Mubarak allowed false opposition to blow off steam, even institutionalizing the Muslim Brotherhood as a permanent dissident presence. When things heated up with Israel, Mubarak let them make noise about the Palestinians. After the Arab Spring, corrupt generals—kids and grandkids of Nasser’s people—concluded it wouldn’t have happened if Mubarak hadn’t tolerated that opposition. Their answer is to crush it all, allow nothing. This guy said it’s gotten brittle. The Egyptian dictatorship is firmly in the saddle now, getting lots of money from the United States, the Emirates, and others while the Middle East was dying down. Sisi’s been spending billions on white elephant projects. When October 7th popped up, it was a windfall for Egypt—they claimed they needed the money to keep things suppressed. The population is more anti-Israel than ever, and there’s a lot of discontent. Things are fragile in Egypt.
There’s a whole foreign policy in Africa where America isn’t even a player, like in Libya. There’s a frozen civil war there—the Libyan National Army, pseudo-Arab nationalists backed by Egypt and Russia, versus Islamists supported by Turkey. America and Europe aren’t involved. You see this in Sudan and other parts of Africa too. It’ll be interesting to see the Jews negotiate with countries they don’t control anymore in a new map where they’re not big players. They’ll have to make serious concessions and pick allies wisely. If they go all in with Egypt and Sisi gets overthrown, what happens? If they go all in with the Turks and Erdoğan gets upset about something the Jews are doing—like when he blocked Israel from NATO military exercises—it’s not just talk. There’s genuine momentum. Turkey is waiting for its moment to flex, and they see it as now. They have leverage. In the West, we’re used to dealing with pro-Israel people even when it’s irrational, like RFK Jr. It makes sense if you factor in blackmail rings, but still.
[00:40:25] - [Striker]: If RFK Jr. is going to pretend Steak 'n Shake is health food, why not pretend Israel is our ally? He’ll take money to say anything.
[00:40:37] - [Warren]: Israel has been a public health crisis.
[00:40:43] - [Striker]: The most important thing is who’s got the best french fries? Gaza has the best—
[00:40:55] - [Warren]: How many Mossad hookers sat on my face over my career and blackmailed me? Pardon my voice. The rest of the world isn’t as bad as the United States, where a guy has a gun to his head and says, “Israel is our greatest ally!” Bang! It’s like a hostage video, the statements we’re used to from our leaders in the West. Erdoğan’s lip service to Palestinians is all talk, no action, but Turkey has interests and won’t just be Israel’s bitch like the West.
[00:41:43] - [Striker]: They’re too big for that. It seemed like the Jews were on a roll in the Middle East, but they’ve hit a hard ceiling. There’s no good options for them. I’ll stick to my prediction: Israel won’t exist in a decade. Its existence depends on the United States being a superpower, and that won’t last much longer.
[00:42:26] - [Warren]: Thinking about Turkey being active in Syria, the more I study history and geopolitics, the more I see regimes come and go, but countries tend to have the same spheres of influence regardless of ideology. Russia under Trotskyite Bolshevism or the Tsar is a classic case. It’s geography—neighbors, rivers, coastlines, mountains determine friends, enemies, and conflict points. Turkey’s activity in Syria fits historically. But with Israel, people on the left call it a colonial outpost of the West, a colonial project. That’s wrong for reasons we know.
[00:43:55] - [Striker]: Totally agree. America’s the colonial project.
[00:43:57] - [Warren]: Israel occupies the same land as the Crusader states, the Kingdom of Jerusalem—
[00:44:10] - [Striker]: The Normans, the Crusaders.
[00:44:12] - [Warren]: For 200 years, they had a Crusader state there, made possible by a constant influx of men, resources, weapons, and trade from Europe to keep that outpost of Christendom alive in the Middle East. Geopolitically, people see Israel that way because it’s not a natural power in the region like Persia.
[00:44:47] - [Striker]: It’s not supposed to be there.
[00:44:59] - [Warren]: They’re right in that sense, but it’s more the West as a colonial project of Zion than the United States as India to Israel’s Great Britain.
[00:45:06] - [Striker]: It’s hard to wrap your mind around, but it’s true. It’s pathetic. The rightoids vibing with Trump have stopped, right?
[00:45:23] - [Warren]: Oh, I love it.
[00:45:28] - [Striker]: There’s no question anymore. It’s just rapacious Jew power. Rapacious and criminal Jew power. I don’t want to talk about all the shit going on.
[00:45:49] - [Warren]: I was holding my tongue on this bullshit, then Hunter Wallace posted not one, but two articles.
[00:45:54] - [Striker]: What’s his ideology now? That guy’s been through a thousand. He was a neo-Confederate five minutes ago. Now a Trump guy? How do you go from burning American flags with the League of the South to “You don’t understand America”? Dude, you’ve got some mental issues, my friend.
[00:46:22] - [Warren]: I critique you for being too much of an asshole. I’ll say I’m too nice. I’m far too nice. Some people have shown themselves to be scum with their takes in the last week, specifically on national socialism. You can attack me, you, or the NJP—I’ll let it go. Start attacking national socialism itself, and I’ll say something. What cracked me up was while Keith, Hunter, and Matt Parrott were posting this crap, pushing back—
[00:47:12] - [Striker]: I haven’t seen him in a while.
[00:47:16] - [Warren]: Trump comes out and says, “Thomas Massie must go! Primary this guy!”
[00:47:23] - [Striker]: I could’ve told you he’d do this.
[00:47:34] - [Warren]: I said you won’t win arguing against cozying up to the system. Sucking up to Elon Musk, Donald Trump—
[00:47:42] - [Striker]: They’re doing it for money, and not even getting it.
[00:47:46] - [Warren]: I hope they’re doing it for money, because if not, I don’t see why—
[00:47:52] - [Striker]: That’s the sad part. Maybe Keith is—I don’t see it worth it for the rest.
[00:47:58] - [Warren]: Others do it better—like Lady MAGA represents Trump well, Matt Parrott doesn’t. I watched them in real time tearing into national socialism, calling it for old losers, then whining, “Gee, it sucks Trump’s doing this to Thomas Massie.” I’m like—
[00:48:19] - [Striker]: I could’ve told you he’d do this.
[00:48:25] - [Warren]: Why not support Trump on that? Say, “Thomas Massie is a libertarian holding up the agenda.” Turn on Fox News—
[00:48:28] - [Striker]: They tried. People say, “This has nothing to do with Israel,” blaming it on some vote.
[00:48:34] - [Warren]: Of course not.
[00:48:42] - [Striker]: If you’re that stupid, stop following politics. Find another hobby. Pickleball’s all the rage. Get into cocaine, shoegaze—there’s a million hobbies for retards out there. Get out of our politics, our political conversation.
[00:49:02] - [Warren]: My family said she’s been seeing Matt Forney surface on Twitter again. She’s like—
[00:49:07] - [Striker]: That’s all right. When the penguin feels it’s safe to come out of the sewer, you know the whole politics is fucked. When the penguin emerges on his platform and runs for mayor, you know the gospel is fucked.
[00:49:34] - [Warren]: I can picture Matt Forney talking to Christopher Walken in the sewer, saying, “It’s time for me to ascend, to reemerge,” and he’s out eating a fish. That’s a name I hadn’t even thought of. I was like, “What?” She said it, and I’m like, “Are you surprised he had that take?” No, I’m just surprised to hear that name after 10 years. That guy still exists?
[00:49:56] - [Striker]: I encourage these people to cling to Trump’s scrotum so when the USS Trump sinks to the bottom of the ocean, they go with him. I’m tired of hearing from these people, debating their stupid ideas, their bad faith arguments. Just go away already. You’re wrong, proven wrong every second of the day. I saw a guy coping about Mahmoud Khalid, saying, “Look at these wig nuts wanting to keep him in the country.” It’s one brown person in New York City. What are you going to accomplish when the free speech precedent they’re setting takes someone’s citizenship away because he’s a college professor who doesn’t support America’s role in saving Israel all the time? I looked at Brad’s Twitter, and he’s like, “National socialism is for losers, cosplayers, and wannabes. It’s wrong, bad.” Then one tweet about that guy being deported: “I don’t care about this.” I’m like—
[00:51:14] - [Warren]: “Hey, all right. Charlie Kirk has the same worldview and is way more successful than you. Why are you in the movement?”
[00:51:22] - [Striker]: You know how Steve Scalise used to say he’s David Duke without the baggage? Hunter Wallace and Parrott are Charlie Kirk with the baggage. What’s the point of your existence? No one’s listening to you. Everyone’s making fun of you. They think you’re lying.
[00:51:49] - [Warren]: They know they’re wrong. Matt Parrott definitely knows he’s full of shit about this.
[00:51:59] - [Striker]: Always has known. That whole thing is indefensible. Ann Coulter came out against what they’re doing to that guy. She said, “I’m always for any excuse to deport anyone, but this is the one that’s actually wrong.” People with permanent residency, married to US citizens—even illegal aliens—have due process, habeas corpus, and free speech. They showed up—
[00:52:37] - [Warren]: I haven’t read the details.
[00:52:39] - [Striker]: He’s a college professor at Columbia University with a green card, married to a US citizen, his wife eight months pregnant. ICE agents went to his staff housing at Morningside Heights, waited for him to leave his dorm, arrested him. He asked, “Why am I being arrested?” They said, “You’re being removed because you’re not a citizen.” He said, “I’ve got a green card.” They said, “Oh, I didn’t know that. You committed a crime.” His lawyer asked, “What crime?” They didn’t know, then disappeared him. Marco Rubio said, “It’s not that he committed a crime. If you’re antisemitic, you’ll get deported.”
[00:53:36] - [Warren]: Let me play this real quick. What’s wrong with that guy’s ears?
[00:53:44] - [Striker]: “President Trump appealed to Americans during his campaign on free speech arguments, not suppressing speech, especially from the government. But your revocation of the green card is seen as one of the most anti-speech actions a secretary could take. How do you respond?”
[00:54:10] - [Warren]: Is the minerals deal the version of the security guarantees?
[00:54:13] - [Striker]: “The minerals deal is beneficial for both countries, providing Ukraine long-term prosperity and security through vibrant economic growth and development.”
[00:54:27] - [Warren]: I thought the minerals were hot. Let’s see if he gets to it.
[00:54:30] - [Striker]: “Their GDP growth gives them leverage, power, and the ability to fund their defenses. Economic development for Ukraine is positive. If the United States has a vested economic interest generating revenue for both peoples, we’d protect it if challenged. It’s not a security guarantee, but a vested interest. When you come to the United States as a visitor on a visa, we can deny it. If you say you support Hamas—a murderous, barbaric group that kidnaps children, rapes teenage girls, takes hostages, lets them die, returns more bodies than live hostages—and intend to rile up antisemitic activities and shut down universities, we’d deny your visa. If you do that here, we’ll revoke it.”
[00:55:52] - [Warren]: Doesn’t mention America once.
[00:56:21] - [Striker]: If you end up with a green card from that visa and engage in those activities, we’ll kick you out. He’s not a student—he’s got a permanent resident visa.
[00:56:27] - [Warren]: When you apply for any visa to enter the United States, we have a right to deny you for virtually any reason, especially if you support Hamas and turn our universities upside down.
[00:56:38] - [Striker]: They’re not doing it by the book. This should be thrown out of court, and Khalid should have grounds to sue the federal government for kidnapping an American permanent resident, not a student visa holder. It’s a green card. An interesting twist: he’s apparently connected to British intelligence. He might have been spying on pro-Palestine students for a Five Eyes agency, and they blew up their own spy. He’s got a security clearance with the British government.
[00:57:42] - [Warren]: Wow. Maybe.
[00:57:55] - [Striker]: Trump and his people emphasized he didn’t commit any crimes. You can take permanent residency away for drunk driving—Mexicans do it all the time and no one cares—but they’re adamant he didn’t commit a crime. My Twitter’s in zombie mode: I can see but can’t post, like prison glass. I logged on, screenshotted this argument that naturally follows. If you’re not an anti-Jewish national socialist but a free-speech-supporting Republican—
[00:58:58] - [Warren]: Why should they oppose this? Someone said, “It’s 100% protected speech to say, ‘I support Hamas.’ It’s not illegal. People are implying otherwise.” Somebody responds with a big Trump pumping his fist: “See that? It’s hate speech, pure and simple. Hamas is no different than the KKK.”
[00:59:31] - [Striker]: That’s what’s absurd about the anti-woke right. Let’s be charitable and pretend they have principles beyond being mercenaries for Jew money. Their principle is the same as no-platform Antifa: defunding Columbia—mostly for medical research—because of an anti-Israel protest two years ago. Their principle is student safety over academic freedom, identical to Antifa’s no-platform stance. If a protected class feels unsafe because of First Amendment activity, the government intervenes. University presidents faced public show trials over protecting Jewish students from offensive speech. Now it’s Carthaginian—burning it all down because a Jew got offended once by a student who doesn’t support Israel. It’s wokeness on steroids. Wokes didn’t take your citizenship. A guy responds, “The government can’t arrest you for saying you support the KKK. Social media might ban you, people might boycott your business, your job might fire you, but arrest isn’t one.” Another says, “It’s protected speech to say, ‘I support the KKK.’”
[01:01:43] - [Warren]: You have an odd situation with this argument. These arguments flow naturally from this. Flag-waving, Trump-pumping, free-speech America fans say, “It’s like the KKK—hate speech,” while Muslims, brown people, immigrants argue, “It’s not illegal to support the KKK.” The idea there’s a line only enforced on white immigrants—
[01:02:41] - [Striker]: Look at Thomas Massie—a heritage American, conservative libertarian making tepid arguments against foreign aid, and Trump wants to destroy his life. This isn’t just about a communist professor. Bad-faith conservatives are using the “shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theater” argument.
[01:03:20] - [Warren]: Where does that come from?
[01:03:25] - [Striker]: A federal judge, Wendell Holmes, coined it during World War I. An antiwar protester handed out flyers resisting the draft, and Holmes said, “You’re not allowed to protest like this—it’s shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theater.’” That’s what it actually is in practice.
[01:07:10] - [Warren]: I was going to find a thing where Laura Loomer went after Thomas Massie. Here it is.
[01:07:27] - [Striker]: Oh, she’s the MAGA populist eating Steak 'n Shake.
[01:07:33] - [Warren]: The post is unavailable. I remember being on Twitter in October when she wrote, “Thomas Massie is such a petty bitch. Why would you even post this? I’m going to make sure President Trump sees this.” It was a poll showing people wanted Massie to run for president or something. She was like, “I’m going to tell on you to the teacher.” I have a feeling Laura Loomer has been personally lobbying Donald Trump over Massie. There are many reasons they want him out. She’s been focusing on him for months. Trump’s statement was, “Thomas Massie is a grandstander. The great people of Kentucky are going to be watching a very interesting primary in the not too distant future.” There was another one where he was worse, but Trump went all in on unseating Massie, who endorsed and voted for him. Not to cast shade on Thomas Massie—he’s probably the best in that institution.
[01:08:51] - [Striker]: People complain about libertarians, but they’ve been pretty good on this. There’s nothing more opposite to me than a libertarian in terms of first principles, moral values, and intellectual reference points. Libertarians are my exact opposite, more than even leftists, yet they’ve been much better on this than most white nationalists. You have to give Thomas Massie credit. He doesn’t have a left-wing support base like the squad—just doing it because it’s right and principled.
[01:09:32] - [Warren]: Trump’s calling him out, saying he should be primaried, and he’ll lead the charge against a guy who voted for him. Our analysis of who runs this country is the only explanation. You can’t say Thomas Massie is just too fiscally conservative and Trump needs money spent. The only reason Trump uses his bully pulpit with such strong attack language—“He should be primaried, and I’ll lead the charge”—is the Jews and Israel. That’s the only reason they’re going after him—everybody goes to jail.
[01:10:47] - [Striker]: The last time Trump went “mask off” like this was with the H-1B thing. We can talk about that later. The Trump cope masters spun that and changed the topic to Pakistani grooming gangs from 2012 with people like Keith, but Trump isn’t pro-white. He’s not pro-America. He doesn’t care about white people or America. He cares about the people who gave him $230 million. That’s it.
[01:11:54] - [Warren]: I see rumblings that Tucker is being sidelined after being used to get in. He’s getting his gumption up for token pushbacks. He should—people should. From what Emily said and what’s going around, Trump got organic pushback on this because people know Thomas Massie is honest, which is so rare. They know it’s because of Israel—a bad look for Trump. I’m not a libertarian, but I hope Thomas Massie runs for president on the Libertarian ticket next time. They have ballot access nationwide, one of only two parties with the Green Party. He could cost the GOP the White House in 2028 as payback, whether it’s JD Vance or someone else. I’d vote for him against Vance or Trump Jr.
[01:13:10] - [Striker]: Well—
[01:13:15] - [Warren]: I wouldn’t mind.
[01:13:24] - [Striker]: If Thomas Massie doesn’t bend the knee, it’ll test Hunter Wallace’s theory that MAGA is a white populist movement, not a Trump celebrity cult. If it’s populist, Massie is the one to support—his majority opinion is that even if people don’t care about Palestine or Israel, they don’t want America involved. Trump’s position is, “You’ve got to go because you criticize my donors.” This will be a litmus test in Kentucky on what MAGA really is. If Massie survives Trump’s primary—which has a low survival rate, like with Jeff Sessions when Trump endorsed a football coach over him—the coach won despite Sessions’ deep roots in Alabama. This will test if Trumpism is a vibe shift or white self-assertion. We’ll see. Libertarians lack the fighting spirit, the go-for-the-throat instinct—my worst criticism. They want to disarm the government by disarming themselves first.
[01:15:23] - [Warren]: If I were Massie, too libertarian or not, he could be the new Ron Paul in 2028. His wife just died—what does he have to live for besides this? He’s got his family, but he’s the last honest man on the right in office, refusing Israel’s money, with a huge following and respect from disagreers. If he ran, he’d get leftists voting for him and a party with ballot access agreeing on 90% of issues.
[01:16:18] - [Striker]: He should stay a thorn in the GOP’s side, not run Libertarian—they’d black him out, and we’d get another Ron Paul moment with white nationalists pretending to be libertarians.
[01:16:26] - [Warren]: Ron Paul ran in the Republican primary, not Libertarian general. I’d form a Spoiler Party to make it clear I’m wrecking it if needed. When you play that role—Jill Stein style—and say, “I don’t care, I’ll ruin it,” you have leverage.
[01:17:34] - [Striker]: I don’t think your take on the electorate is correct. White Americans aren’t looking for protest votes—they’re nihilistic about politics in a good way, thinking America is dead with no hope. Trump voters are calling an airstrike on themselves to kill the libs around them. They’re done with America, politics, and the electoral system—bringing the bull into the china shop on purpose, not caring if they’re the china.
[01:18:42] - [Warren]: That’s true to some extent, but Trump and JD Vance are trying to make people buy into America again. Enough right-wingers, especially young people, are against Israel that a right-wing, anti-Israel candidate in 2028—even libertarian—would get shocking support from white right-wingers.
[01:19:08] - [Striker]: Especially if Trump’s out of the picture.
[01:19:29] - [Warren]: The Jewish mafia would get very angry. Jews are in a bind—even in America—because media ecosystems are siloed streams like Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and Ben Shapiro that don’t cross.
[01:20:02] - [Striker]: This is bad for Jews—they can’t control where it goes. There’s a lot of anti-Zionist stuff debated openly because there’s no mainstream anymore. It’s just people going off in their own directions with their own fan clubs. Without interaction, it’s a good thing. Once they control the mainstream, I predict a big extinction of podcasts soon. They’ll re-erect gatekeepers to control the debate better. Frankly, a lot of podcasts are garbage, which will help them. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter—there’s no America anymore. We’re living in the Soviet Union of the 1980s, nothing but nihilism.
[01:21:46] - [Warren]: The Massie thing highlights loyalty to Israel. His vote against the funding package is the perfect excuse, like the South Africa thing—persecuting white people. The Republican Party figures this out after decades, but the press release starts with, “They’re against Israel.” They can’t just say, “So-and-so doesn’t support Israel—get him!” anymore. Now it’s, “South Africa persecutes white people—sanctions!” or “He didn’t fund the bill—primary him!” Anyone believing this is the real reason Trump’s targeting him is ridiculous. If you believe it’s not an overreaction by Trump to a supporter, compare Thomas Massie’s gun rights record to Pam Bondi’s—Attorney General, gun grabber with red flag laws. Massie’s the top Second Amendment advocate.
[01:23:05] - [Striker]: Wait until we get into immigration. Jim Jordan, the big populist in Congress, is drafting legislation to drastically increase H1B visas, as I predicted. The bots are out in force tonight.
[01:23:42] - [Warren]: I’m having fun banning them—one click, and they’re gone. Leave some Super Chat money, and maybe I won’t block you.
[01:23:50] - [Striker]: Send $10, and I’ll read your Super Chat about Emily being at happa and me being Puerto Rican and Cuban.
[01:24:17] - [Warren]: I don’t play video games while streaming—we have a live audience. This is fun because even YouTube’s kind of on fire tonight.
[01:24:25] - [Striker]: Tel Aviv’s keyboards have heat coming out—you can hear the ferocious clicking. Why do the Feds even bother? It’s just FBI and bots.
[01:24:41] - [Warren]: We have a list of everyone we’ve blocked—it’s starting to look like a mass grave.
[01:24:51] - [Striker]: Get a bulldozer to push the bodies in—everyone claps.
[01:24:57] - [Warren]: I picture them lined up like in Schindler’s List, on the balcony with the rifle, using my block button.
[01:25:04] - [Striker]: You’re hungover with your fenders up—there’s another buzzy one.
[01:25:07] - [Warren]: Every now and then, I let one go. What’s that Schindler’s List line? “I reprieve you.” I haven’t seen that movie in a while, but I enjoy this.
[01:25:29] - [Striker]: I hope the FBI spends lots of resources on us so Palestinian terrorists can operate freely—that’s the glass half full.
[01:25:41] - [Warren]: It’s “I pardon you,” that’s the line.
[01:25:54] - [Striker]: Keep it up, Quantico boys—let’s keep it going.
[01:27:04] - [Warren]: The Thomas Massie thing is amazing—the difference in character, his background, no trace of Trump world’s scammy stuff.
[01:27:12] - [Striker]: He was there before MAGA. The few good ones pre-MAGA—like Jeff Sessions—have been wiped out.
[01:27:35] - [Warren]: Who’s that Kansas anti-immigration guy? Kobach?
[01:28:06] - [Striker]: Kris Kobach. Whatever happened to him? If serious about stopping immigration, why not make him head of DHS? He’s a lawyer with experience, unlike Pam Bondi. Trump hires scummy people like Steve Witkoff—his Jewish golfing buddy—to negotiate the Ukraine deal with Russia, despite no Middle East or geopolitical knowledge.
[01:28:56] - [Warren]: Golfing buddy. Mark Sloboda on Danny Haiphong said Russians are serious, and America has no idea what they’re doing sending golfing buddies.
[01:29:14] - [Striker]: One good thing about Trump’s ham-fisted approach is it’s losing seasoned shills like Andrew Sullivan—gay, AIDS, Republican, ex-Zionist with Barry Weiss—now saying Jews are overreaching. No one defends them—not Blacks, not fags with AIDS, no goy can be trusted. Rahm Emanuel’s running in 2028—son of an Irgun terrorist—because they can’t rely on anyone else.
[01:31:56] - [Warren]: No anti-Semitic memes there. Trump’s response to anti-Semitism leans on hard power, not Soviet-style disappearances. They can’t soft-pedal it—PR won’t work, so everything’s a nail for the hammer.
[01:32:14] - [Striker]: With foreign students like Khalid, even if he’s not deported, the chilling effect—stressed by Trump and Rubio as political speech—imports ZOG-compliant technocrats to universities. They can’t trust white liberals or Blacks anymore—importing compliant pajits to rule us is the point.
[01:33:19] - [Warren]: With anti-Semitism, we had Columbia. A Pentagon spokesman criticized Israel or the Liberty—I don’t have it handy. Anyone know if they kept their job?
[01:34:02] - [Striker]: Kingsley Wilson—Steve Cortes’ daughter, a Trump shill. They found old anti-Israel tweets.
[01:34:15] - [Warren]: She’s not fired yet—not because Jews don’t control things, but they’re nervous to act. Senate Republicans are unsettled—Roger Wicker’s investigating. Mother Jones calls her bigoted, xenophobic, tied to Trump 2020, with a history of anti-immigrant, anti-trans posts. It’s Leo Frank, not Israel—she repeated “debunked lies” about his lynching, claiming guilt when historians say he was wrongly convicted. That’s usually career-ending, but she’s still there.
[01:37:33] - [Striker]: Semaphore’s article on QT influencers—young women like Brett Cooper—worries Jews they might turn antisemitic. America’s feminine culture means women embracing ideas mainstreams them—not incels. Jews worry, but these women focus on vaccines and home remedies for now. The fear is that there could be a moment where they all start doing what Candace Owens did and go off on the Jews. That’s something to look out for.
[01:39:14] - [Warren]: What do you think is going on with Candace Owens?
[01:39:17] - [Striker]: I can’t tell you. Some of that stuff is just kind of stupid. Generally speaking, they’re not happy about it. One conspiratorial view is that they’re setting up straw man arguments against Jews to easily debunk them. Like Blanchik Stock arguing with Sam Seder, saying, “America’s a Christian country.” It’s never been easier because conservatives make arguments stupid and always pull punches. It’s never been easier for the Left or the Jews to refute pro-white arguments. People like Matt Walsh and Stock and that whole crowd don’t make good arguments. That girl says America was founded as a Christian country. Any thoughtful or intelligent person can look up what the Founding Fathers thought of religion and prove her wrong. The United States is the first country in history to give official citizenship to Jews in the 18th century. It’s true that America’s a European country, but the idea that it’s some kind of theocratic country is false. Add in the fact that Stock is Catholic and posts pictures of herself in a church full of Mexicans. You’re not much of a xenophobe if you go to a church full of Mexicans and you’re Catholic. They don’t make good arguments. People insisting that conservatives embracing our arguments are doing us a favor are wrong. They’re not. They’re making our arguments stupid and pre-debunking them by embracing that.
[01:41:28] - [Warren]: There has been an influx of people jumping on the bandwagon that reminds me of e-girls particularly jumping on the bandwagon that reminds me of 2017, before Charlottesville. I remember a lot of people coming in saying crazy shit for attention. This seems much more like AstroTurf though. That one we profiled on my show, the Wexler girl, you look at the evidence and it’s a complete Israeli op. She’s a Chabad fanatic from Israel, a based right-wing e-girl tired of the woke stuff. Came out of nowhere. Only started surfacing in the month after October 7th. There’s one that’s obvious.
[01:42:30] - [Striker]: There’s more awareness of this. I have to give the internet masses credit. They’re finally onto it. You see people like Ian Carroll or even Darrell Cooper. Darrell Cooper is just relitigating. He’s frankly plagiarizing David Irving’s work while editing out the best parts in a controlled fashion. So the question is, is that a good thing or a bad thing? The debate I’m hearing from Jews is, do these influencers and podcasts represent some new antisemitic turn in American culture, or are they simply bringing to the surface the antisemitism that was already there? I’m more on the latter side, especially after Gaza. People are more interested in anti-Jewish stuff and how it works, and these grifters are just jumping on. If tomorrow it was profitable to do pro-Jewish stuff, they would be doing it. They’re profiting off something that exists independent of them.
[01:43:49] - [Warren]: The sentiment is so off the charts. I don’t think the polls are capturing it properly because people don’t do honest reporting in polling. The level of antisemitic feeling out there in the general public, especially among young people and right-wing white young people, is probably double what the polls show when they ask these questions. At least, if it’s not three times what it is. Here’s more stuff. Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson’s posts spreading the far-right great replacement theory have angered lawmakers on both sides of the aisle. Richie Torres. I predict, if the theory of power holds, this girl won’t keep her job. I don’t see them letting her keep it.
[01:44:55] - [Striker]: Probably not. Who’s going to do this work, then? Who under 40 will do this work? You can’t trust anyone under 40 with this. They’ve all been exposed to this type of stuff.
[01:45:10] - [Warren]: For all we know, this girl might be a listener to this show. I’m not kidding.
[01:45:14] - [Striker]: That’s not out of the realm of possibility.
[01:45:16] - [Warren]: It’s not. Replacement—so there were multiple great replacement things here. Plus, when somebody talks about the great replacement and then mentions Leo Frank—it’s like, “Ah.”
[01:45:36] - [Striker]: We know, and the Jews know what you’re listening to.
[01:45:38] - [Warren]: We know, and they know. Good for her. I hope—
[01:45:49] - [Striker]: Everyone in the conservative milieu is hiding their power levels. Increasingly, this is true for people in the liberal milieu. Young liberals have much harder anti-Zionist views than they even say. You can’t trust anyone. You’ll have to have a whole administration staffed by Rahm Emanuel and his family members.
[01:46:10] - [Warren]: What’s funny is about this girl—she got a pass, and that makes sense. It’s almost like you might get this more from someone who is the daughter or son of someone in power than someone who organically climbs their way up from the bottom. Anybody who climbs their way up without nepotism is going to have to sell out and compromise so much on the way up that by the time they get there, they’re completely corrupt. But someone like her gets a pass because they don’t trust the people, so they’re increasingly relying on, “Okay, this one’s trusted, therefore their kid is trusted.” But the kids are reading the stuff out there. Social media has had a good effect on the country, even though it’s made everybody neurotic narcissists. I notice young people look better than they used to. Growing up in West Virginia, you can look at my old yearbook—people didn’t take care of themselves in terms of weight or how they looked. Now I see pictures of young people in West Virginia today in the newspaper or in high school classes, and they’re more photogenic. How they look is a little better. The internet has produced a collective raising of intelligence in some respects. People know. There are organic networks of knowledge. They try to spin it like Joe Rogan is the new Fox News or make it back like the ‘60s with three television networks. Elon Musk buys Twitter. I don’t think they know what they’re doing, and it’s not working. It’s killing—
[01:48:28] - [Striker]: They’re trying a lot of stuff, and none of it’s working.
[01:48:32] - [Warren]: They tried the ban-everything approach after Charlottesville.
[01:48:36] - [Striker]: Didn’t work.
[01:48:36] - [Warren]: That didn’t work. Now it’s, “Let’s try free speech under Elon and ham—”
[01:48:43] - [Striker]: And we have shills that meet them halfway so they can be de-radicalized. That’s over.
[01:48:52] - [Warren]: Because it’s not working.
[01:48:56] - [Striker]: People are aware now. It worked for a little while, but people like Ian Carroll or even Keith Woods had their 15 minutes. Now everyone’s like, “Oh, as soon as the man’s on 15 of his 15 minutes, he starts doing the ‘Nazis were the bad guys’ bit.” One guy made a good point about Matt Walsh. Shills were promoting him. I’ve always hated that guy. I always saw what he was doing. People were saying, “It doesn’t matter if he takes a generic view on aid to Israel, where he’s against all aid.” At the end of the day, he’s pulling eyeballs to the Daily Wire. He’s pulling eyeballs to the performer in the yarmulke. He’s a hype man on the street in New York City comedy clubs going, “Hey, want to see this comedian? I’ll be opening, so come to the event.” That’s what he does. They’re trying to stay relevant and control discussion. But with so many challenges to their power, they end up giving it away. In the case of Laura Loomer and Mark Levin coming together to block the guy, Davis. Did you see that?
[01:50:32] - [Warren]: No, I didn’t.
[01:50:33] - [Striker]: They tried to appoint a colonel, Daniel Davis.
[01:50:39] - [Warren]: Wait, one last thing. Kingsley Wilson said, “Make Kosovo Serbia again.” I’m going down the rabbit hole with this girl. She seems really cool. She’s posting good stuff. They screwed up here. Anyway, go ahead. What were you saying?
[01:51:06] - [Striker]: Oh, don’t even bother— Hey, feds, all you Quantico boys and Israelis in the chat, $5 and we’ll read your stupid “Emily is a Satanist” chat.
[01:51:19] - [Warren]: You better. Five $5, and I promise we’ll read it.
[01:51:23] - [Striker]: $5 is enough. Put it in your Super Chats. We’ll read them.
[01:51:33] - [Warren]: This is really amazing. So what were you saying about Ben Shapiro? Sorry.
[01:51:41] - [Striker]: Basically, people try to keep a foot in the door with the online right and also support the Jew power structure. They keep exposing themselves. Laura Loomer and Mark Levin were the ones who got that guy Davis blocked. He made a tepid anti-Israel remark once and was going to be at the DNI. They said he’s anti-Israel.
[01:52:22] - [Warren]: What was his name?
[01:52:23] - [Striker]: Did you miss this?
[01:52:24] - [Warren]: Oh, okay, I’m getting to it.
[01:52:26] - [Striker]: Davis.
[01:52:26] - [Warren]: I totally missed this. Here’s Laura Loomer—Deputy DNI Director Mr. Davis. “Israel first” is in the comments. They can’t stop it anymore. The comments.
[01:52:47] - [Striker]: No.
[01:52:47] - [Warren]: So who is this guy?
[01:52:51] - [Striker]: He was going to be the deputy DNI director.
[01:52:56] - [Warren]: And it was over what, exactly, that they stopped him?
[01:52:59] - [Striker]: He said he doesn’t think Iran is the biggest threat to America.
[01:53:03] - [Warren]: I see. Trump administration pulls intel job offer for critic of Israel. Daniel Davis described US support for war in Gaza as a stain on the nation. A retired army officer—see, it’s not just Nazis anymore. It’s not just Palestinian supporters who arrived off the boat yesterday. It’s normal people, Americans of all walks of life—libertarians, everybody. A retired army officer in line for a senior intelligence position in the Trump administration was pulled from contention amid opposition over his criticism of Israel. Daniel Davis, a fellow at the Koch-funded Defense Priorities think-tank, was expected to be named Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Mission Integration until his appointment was withdrawn Wednesday. He’s been critical of Israel’s response to the Hamas attack of October 7th, 2023, describing it as a “convenient” excuse to justify “wanton destruction” in Gaza. He described US support for the war as a “stain on our character as a nation.” Views at odds with the Trump administration and both parties.
[01:54:23] - [Striker]: There’s another one now, a guy named Adam Boehler, who’s Jewish. He did an interview on Jake Tapper—
[01:54:30] - [Warren]: Mark Warner—fuck that piece of shit. He’s a top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. I met Mark Warner, had a conversation with him with the Democratic Party. He used to be common-sense, almost centrist, not in a bad way, then went all in on Trump-Russia stuff. Now Trump’s all in on Israel, but Warner, beholden to Zionists, says, “He’s utterly unqualified for any role in intelligence analysis, particularly one as important as deputy—” Mark Warner, you suck. You’re a traitor to this country. Sorry, that pisses me off. You expect that from Republicans, but still—
[01:55:24] - [Striker]: The average Israeli has quadruple citizenship. They say, “You’re betraying American hostages in Israel.” How dare they question the loyalty of a colonel? A colonel named Davis—that’s as American as it gets. Dual citizens pick and choose if they can work in our government. That’s outrageous.
[01:56:03] - [Warren]: Fox News host Mark Levin described the decision as bizarre and hard to understand, while the Anti-Defamation League called it extremely dangerous. Shortly after Politico reported on the appointment, Warner’s office was notified he’d been withdrawn. In 2012, after a year-long deployment in Afghanistan, he accused military leaders of misleading the public about the war’s progress. America has been filled with people like this—principled guys, not like us with our views and ideology, but normal Americans seeing this takeover and protesting it. Look at this guy with the Koch brothers’ think-tank. You’re right—they’re paranoid. These people keep cropping up on the right.
[01:57:18] - [Striker]: There’s no one else.
[01:57:20] - [Warren]: There’s no one else.
[01:57:20] - [Striker]: There’s a consensus now that what Israel is doing is the worst thing that’s ever happened involving the United States. It’s one of the worst things we’ve been dragged into. No one makes an argument for why we’re dragged into it. What do we get out of it? Even the most careerist politician looks at his legacy as a historical figure and thinks, “I don’t want to sign my name onto this.”
[01:57:48] - [Warren]: The left is disgusting too. You see all the traitors attacking this woman for her antisemitic and racist conspiratism. Her Leo Frank tweet: “Leo Frank raped and murdered a 13-year-old girl. He tried to frame a Black man for his crime.”
[01:58:12] - [Striker]: Is it true or false?
[01:58:13] - [Warren]: I mean—
[01:58:13] - [Striker]: It’s true.
[01:58:14] - [Warren]: The ADL said, “He was unjustly imprisoned.” They didn’t say he was innocent of the crime.
[01:58:29] - [Striker]: They hold that he was innocent, but they’re lying. The truth is they don’t care if he’s innocent or not.
[01:58:38] - [Warren]: That’s it. Here’s their tweet: “Today marks 39 years since Leo Frank was posthumously pardoned, a significant day in ADL history. Frank was lynched by a hate-filled mob in Georgia after being unjustly convicted of murder in a trial marred by antisemitism.” One look at that guy—he did it. He was a freak. That’s what happened.
[01:59:18] - [Striker]: The ADL’s argument is that a jury in Jim Crow Georgia in 1915 blamed an innocent Jewish man and let a guilty Black man go. In Jim Crow Georgia—a wealthy, connected Jew was the victim of an antisemitic mob who passed over an actual Black murderer to get to him. It’s an absurdity on its face. Anyway, let’s look at this other thing I sent you—Boehler. This guy, who’s Jewish, went on Jake Tapper. He said, “Hamas is ready and willing to negotiate, and we have to treat them like any other diplomatic issue. We can’t just treat them like terrorists. We have to talk to them.” He lost his job for saying that. The Jewish insider got Trump to sideline him.
[02:00:40] - [Warren]: GOP sources told Jewish insiders the administration has pulled him off the Hamas hostage file and opined he needs to be further sidelined or pushed out. Sidelined for his comments. What were his comments? Boehler sparked controversy for holding direct talks with Hamas leaders without Israel and for comments he made in interviews about the meeting. Didn’t Steve Wittkop do the same thing? Didn’t he go directly to Gaza and talk to them? I thought he did. I’m surprised this happened because you say this guy is Jewish? I figured they’d let Wittkop talk to Hamas because they can—
[02:01:26] - [Striker]: That’s different because he’s got the Israelis there with him.
[02:01:30] - [Warren]: That’s interesting. What was the other thing you sent me?
[02:01:40] - [Striker]: So Elbridge Colby. People were saying there’s no way for Elbridge Colby to get a position in the US State Department. Then they gave him some low-level position. However, I didn’t know until the other day that they’ve been putting off his confirmation the whole time. He was given a second-string State Department role. He’s famous because he says we need to focus on China more than Iran. That’s why the Jews don’t like him. I didn’t know he was being held up. He hasn’t gotten into his position yet. They’re engaging in naked tyranny here. They can’t trust anyone with these positions. There’s Elbridge Colby for you. That stuff with Boehler is something else. Elbridge Colby, who is from the Quincy—
[02:03:01] - [Warren]: Prominent realist who’s pushed for the United States to prioritize the Indo-Pacific over other regions. Garnered strong support from J.D. Vance and other prominent figures in Trump’s inner circle. Served in the Defense Department, but his nomination has stirred debate within the Republican Party, with traditional defense hawks questioning his restraint-oriented positions in recent weeks. Tom Cotton, one of the Senate’s most ardent hawks, said, “I have concerns about what you’ve said in the past, namely that if we had to choose between containing a nuclear Iran and preventing Iran with military force from getting nukes, we should tolerate a nuclear Iran and try to contain it.” That’s it. Your career’s over, buddy. You might as well say, “I was reading Mein Kampf the other day and I read this line about fighting the Jews is the Lord’s work.” Your career is done.
[02:04:02] - [Striker]: It’s the same thing.
[02:04:02] - [Warren]: By the way, did you see that the president of Iran told them to go to hell or something? What did he say?
[02:04:10] - [Striker]: That’s something we should also mention. Iran, China, and Russia did a joint military exercise. That’s a show of force. That’s a show of “If you touch Iran, we’re going to intervene.” The Iranian leadership is just like, “We’re not going to negotiate with Trump because he says openly that negotiating with us is just to buy time to attack us later.”
[02:04:38] - [Warren]: What’s happening, I think, is them trying to wind things down in Ukraine. We can talk about that a little because there’s been some interesting developments. What happened was the big kerfuffle in the Oval Office with the clown show with Zelenskyy that we discussed. They’re pressuring Ukraine, and Europe was like, “We’re going to lead the war charge against Russia.” Then they got Ukraine to say, “Okay, we’ll agree to a ceasefire.” I don’t think the exact terms have been made public. Now they’re like, “We’ll resume the aid to Ukraine since they’ve agreed to a ceasefire.” The same Europeans who were saying, “We will go to war against Russia!” are now saying, “A ceasefire sounds great. Good idea.”
[02:05:42] - [Striker]: A ceasefire that only one side takes is called surrender.
[02:05:48] - [Warren]: The Trump administration now, all the chatter in the last few days has been, “The ball’s in Russia’s court now. It’s up to them to make—” Trump even said, “Yeah, we could make it really tough on Russia. We could put sanctions on them, but I don’t want to. We could hurt them quite badly. I don’t want to do it.” So Putin apparently gave a press conference. I didn’t watch it, but I saw people talking about it, where he was very cool. Cool as cucumbers. He’s just like, “We welcome a ceasefire.”
[02:06:21] - [Striker]: “We’re winning the war.”
[02:06:21] - [Warren]: “We welcome a ceasefire that will remove the causes of the conflict in the first place.” In other words, “We want everything.” You called it theater. I’ve heard other people calling it theater. People see you’re running a huge bluff. You don’t have the actual hard power—
[02:06:50] - [Striker]: No.
[02:06:52] - [Warren]: To do this, or else you would be using it. Doubting this guy. “What if he’s a cuck? What if he was put there by the US assassinating his predecessor or has weak tendencies?” He’s taking a giant F-U to Trump with this statement—“Do whatever the hell you want,” is what he said. They don’t usually use that kind of language.
[02:07:24] - [Striker]: Part of the problem is he has no choice because Trump is doing the madman theory of geopolitics—“The Iranians are going to pay. They’re going to pay the price.” You leave this guy no choice but to be like, “I guess we’re going to have to prepare for war.” Trump is like the anti-Machiavelli—the madman theory doesn’t work if everyone saw what you did in the first administration and now has counters to it. America is significantly weaker now than even 10 years ago. I don’t know what Trump and his people are thinking with this. It stinks of desperation.
[02:08:09] - [Warren]: The world knows it. It’s a really bad thing. What’s going to happen is they’re going to have to do something to reestablish deterrence, meaning they’re going to have to bloody some noses somewhere. Because if the world stops paying attention to Trump’s threats and bluster—
[02:08:39] - [Striker]: It’s partially his own fault.
[02:08:41] - [Warren]: When somebody stands up to the bully. This is classic bully psychology on the schoolyard, right? Everybody’s afraid of the bully, but one kid stands up and gives him a bloody nose or whatever. Now everybody knows, “The bully isn’t so tough. He backed down from that fight.” Once a bully is seen as not being as tough as he pretends or willing to back down, he’s lost his hold. That’s what I read this as, them just saying, “Okay, we’ll prepare for war.” The exact quote was, “It is unacceptable for the US to give orders and make threats. I won’t even negotiate with you. Do whatever the hell you want,” state media quoted Pezeshkian as saying.
[02:09:30] - [Striker]: The problem for Trump is that he keeps making threats, walking them back, then making them again. Take the tariffs, for example. They were talking about putting tariffs on Canadian products. The Canadians said, “We’ll just do a surcharge on the electricity we pipe into America.” Trump’s like, “I was just kidding.” You do that enough, people stop taking your threats seriously. Mexico is another thing. People keep asking, “Why does Trump keep doing this with tariffs?” The reality is the world is moving away from America in terms of its economic influence. Trump is trying to use this tariff threat to bring countries back to the table. It’s similar to the Nixon administration when the US dollar was being run on because of Charles de Gaulle and so on. He started to do this stuff, but he actually went through with it. In this case, the world is saying the American economy is not sustainable with the debt it has. That’s the summary of what’s going on—to bring these countries to the negotiating table to renegotiate the world economy in a way that allows America to keep consuming more than it produces. Most of the world is saying, “Why? I don’t want to do this.” This is from the Manhattan Institute. “Making Sense of Trump’s Tariffs.” I can send this to you if you want. It’s very insightful, this article. It’s about how the US debt is unsustainable. It says, “First, it wants to maintain but reduce the financial burdens associated with the US’s leading role. Second, it wants to get our national debt on a more sustainable path. Third, it wants to restore America’s industrial capacity.” When you’re in the amount of debt America’s in, you need to inflate your currency to inflate your debt away by putting tariffs on. Trump gets to do this. I have some dollars stashed away. I’ll end up having to buy gold or something because they’re going to do mass inflation on the US dollar. All the libertarian doomsday scenarios are about to come true if the tariffs are instituted. I think they will be—because they need to inflate the US national debt away. They want the rest of the world to pay for it, but also the American consumer. If you’re not following along, the tariffs are intended to make up for the strong dollar. It’s a complicated thing, but there’s reason for it. It’s not just reshoring manufacturing.
[02:12:43] - [Warren]: That’s very risky though because inflation is very unpopular.
[02:12:51] - [Striker]: They have no choice. “A CFA institute surveyed over 4,000 global financial professionals before the 2024 presidential election, asking about the US debt and the future of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. 77% of respondents said US government finances are unsustainable, and close to two-thirds expect the dollar will lose its leading reserve currency status in the next five to 15 years. A plurality, 38%, believed the US dollar would be displaced by a multipolar currency system where several currencies share global reserve status. This reflects a strengthening view that the global financial system is moving toward diversification with no single currency likely to replace the dollar outright. Such a transition could lead to greater currency competition and increase uncertainty in global financial markets, directly impacting the US dollar’s position.” The de-dollarization stuff that BRICS people talk about is coming true.
[02:14:20] - [Warren]: You can see how Trump’s whole thing is going to accelerate it.
[02:14:20] - [Striker]: His thing is like, “If you do a different currency in your trade, we’re going to put a tariff on you.” That’s what he keeps saying. But what if people are ready and willing to eat that cost?
[02:14:33] - [Warren]: That’s it. What benefits do you offer by working with the United States? Increasingly, it’s just money.
[02:14:49] - [Striker]: It’s dollars. It’s literally just dollars.
[02:14:50] - [Warren]: That’s what the Egyptians get for working with the United States—all kinds of drawbacks. You just get money. So what if dollars—what if you lose that? What if you can’t offer that anymore? Then what?
[02:15:05] - [Striker]: The main thing is that the dollar reserve currency is also a way to enforce sanctions. It’s a tool of geopolitical attitude adjustment. The problem is, the more you use it, the more you incentivize people to do away with dollars. The Chinese are selling all their US debt. Five countries are trying to get rid of their Treasury bonds that finance the American debt, which is another reason you see cuts like Doge doing. They’re preparing for the big economic nuke.
[02:15:49] - [Warren]: Somebody said, “World reserve currency status only lasts for countries about 100 years. We’re at roughly 110 years of US denominational dominance. Take that for what it’s worth.”
[02:16:04] - [Striker]: History. It’s a tool of colonialism. The Spanish had a world reserve currency. The British had a—
[02:16:12] - [Warren]: I got here. Look, he sent a chart. Natural Law 86. Thank you very much for that. Yeah, look at that—so there’s the reserve currencies and history of reserve currencies—the Portuguese—what is that? The Dutch occupation, Catalan Revolt, fall of Iberian Union, and the Thirty Years’ War. The Dutch East India Company decline, Anglo-Dutch Wars, the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars, the British East India Company decline, World War I, the Great Depression, World War II, the 9/11 terrorist attacks, war on terror. Then what after that? So it’s Portugal, Spain, Netherlands, France, Britain, America, and then global. That’s fascinating.
[02:16:57] - [Striker]: They know they’re overdue. They’re overdue for this. Remember when I said don’t trust that stuff with Trump making peace with Russia? They just announced—
[02:17:10] - [Warren]: I know.
[02:17:10] - [Striker]: They’re going to do more sanctions than even Biden on Russia. Does doing things like this help the US dollar as reserve currency or hurt it? The answer is it hurts it.
[02:17:33] - [Warren]: They're trying to do too many things at once. By the way, before we move on, I just want to mention this. This is a video of the Iranian delegation meeting in Belarus. They just signed a joint defensive agreement. It’s a big deal.
[02:18:08] - [Striker]: Nobody expects Belarus.
[02:18:12] - [Warren]: All the things that are happening here—I think they were expecting Trump and Whitcoff to isolate Iran once Trump gets in, make the deal or whatever—take the heat off this and isolate Iran.
[02:18:30] - [Striker]: Belarus and these other countries are realizing this is America's weak point. Trump is on his knees begging for a ceasefire—because you are so deeply engaged with Iran. So their answer is—get even more engaged with them. Then they'll surrender all of Eastern Europe to us.
[02:18:54] - [Warren]: You know what it’s like? It’s like the Robert De Niro character in Casino—he’s so on top of his game with everything, but he’s got Sharon Stone as his wife. She’s this horrible drug-addicted—total train wreck of war.
[02:19:12] - [Striker]: That’s America and Israel.
[02:19:13] - [Warren]: And that’s his weakness in the film—his irrational devotion to this woman that’s a flaming train wreck. That’s America with Israel. You’re right, put the pressure there. We were joking about that. I remember saying that when the Ukraine thing started—“Start something in the Middle East—”
[02:19:47] - [Striker]: Get close to Iran. It will bring Uncle Sam to his knees.
[02:19:57] - [Warren]: No, I always say the end of The Lord of the Rings, the end of the books—in the books, the armies of Mordor are ready to sack the Gondor people, and then suddenly Sauron realizes, “Oh shit, there’s a hobbit right there getting ready to throw the ring. Get back! Get back! Get back!” There’s this wonderful line where all these ringwraiths and everything he’s got is streaming back to Mordor to try to stop the ring from going in. I really think that—
[02:20:34] - [Striker]: That’s literally what it is.
[02:20:34] - [Warren]: Passage in the book, yeah. When I think about how they see things the way we analyze things on this show—
[02:20:45] - [Striker]: They have to be, because Russia getting close to Iran is random as fuck.
[02:20:50] - [Warren]: Yeah, it is.
[02:20:51] - [Striker]: It makes no geopolitical sense other than the Kremlin knows that Jews are America’s weakness. That’s it. It’s not just that they’re buying their oil or drones. The Russians have a security pact with Iran.
[02:21:08] - [Warren]: Well, that’s the thing.
[02:21:08] - [Striker]: And they signed it days before Trump was inaugurated.
[02:21:11] - [Warren]: Yes, I know, and I thought—
[02:21:12] - [Striker]: It’s hard strategy.
[02:21:13] - [Warren]: That was very deliberate. This was yesterday, less than 12 hours ago. Strategic military ties strengthened as Iran-Belarus ink defense agreement in Minsk. It said it was a defense cooperation agreement. The pact illustrates the growing military collaboration between the two nations. During the ceremony, it emphasized the agreement’s role in reinforcing defense and security interactions through practical measures, hailed it as a foundation for long-term stability in an era of escalating unilateralism. Both ministers criticized Western sanctions and NATO expansion, advocating instead for defensive diplomacy and regional alliances independent of US or European frameworks. The agreement also highlights technological exchange with Iran’s significant domestic defense manufacturing possibly offering a platform for cooperation. So this is a big deal.
[02:22:26] - [Striker]: Yeah. Belarus is on the map now. They realize, “Hey, if I want free shit from America, I just—if I want the United States of America to come and beg my little six, seven million population country for mercy, this is all I need to do. Just hang out with the ayatollah, vibe with the ayatollah—then everyone in Washington will drop everything and be like, ‘What do you want?’ Anything.” It’s pathetic. Our country is pathetic.
[02:23:00] - [Warren]: By the way, I just gotta say, I heard Scott Ritter say this, so take it for what it’s worth but—
[02:23:12] - [Striker]: Oh boy, uh-oh.
[02:23:14] – [Warren]: Scott Ritter said something good. He talked about how everyone wants to see this. Putin apparently said anybody still operating in Kursk or that area past a certain point will be treated as terrorists. We all know what that means. Ritter also said the Russians are increasingly focusing on drone operators—those people who stalk wounded soldiers and then murder them. Apparently, they’re doing two things: treating these guys as terrorists, which they should, and that should be the end game.
[02:24:05] – [Striker]: You should have your hands chopped off if captured doing that.
[02:24:12] – [Warren]: They should be executed as terrorists, as war criminals, because it is a war crime to stalk and murder a wounded guy like that. Anyway, the Russians are focusing on the drone operators, which gave me great satisfaction. They look at the type of drone, figure out its operating radius, and when the drones return, they find all the likely spots within that radius. They surveil the whole map, identify possible locations, watch for drones coming out, and then take them out.
[02:25:09] – [Striker]: It’s stupid when drones were flying over New Jersey and they said, “No one in the government knows what these drones are or where they’re coming from.” How is that possible? Just follow it back to the drone base. They were hiding something with that—some gay op was afoot. You can wait for the drone to return and know exactly where it’s coming from.
[02:25:37] – [Warren]: I think that’s really satisfying to everyone watching this war who’s been disgusted by that spectacle. I haven’t seen the Russians make propaganda like that. Maybe they have—perhaps Russian culture has produced some.
[02:25:52] – [Striker]: No, this is a purely nihilistic Western thing. You have that Levantine Drew Pavlou celebrating that kind of shit. It’s a pure nihilistic neoliberal mongrel thing.
[02:26:11] – [Warren]: We’ve played it on this show—that one video where they’re like, “Look at him. He’s wounded. He’s mine. I’m gonna get him.”
[02:26:19] – [Striker]: They’re gonna be sorry because America’s not gonna protect them forever.
[02:26:22] – [Warren]: I love that they’re focusing on killing them on the battlefield. If you’re a Russian soldier, the fear from seeing a video like that—put out to intimidate—is thinking, “That’s gonna be me, crawling wounded.”
[02:26:46] – [Striker]: It’s ISIS—the ISIS theory of propaganda. The Ukrainians and ISIS literally have the same publicists, the same marketing team.
[02:26:56] – [Warren]: It totally is. Much of the terror bombing in Germany—the V in V2 rocket stands for vengeance, revenge. I read that the German people didn’t think this would win the war, but they got collective satisfaction from it hitting London, hitting the British. That’s a moralizing thing. When an enemy uses a fear or terror tactic on you, hurting them back has a great moralizing effect on your people.
[02:27:47] – [Striker]: The problem is the Ukrainian government isn’t run by Ukrainians, so they don’t care if you hit back at Ukrainians. I think the Russians know this on some level, which is why they’ve been reluctant to attack civilian infrastructure.
[02:28:10] – [Warren]: They have to live with these people after the war. That’s the problem.
[02:28:17] – [Striker]: Ruling a country where you don’t care if the people die is a huge advantage in a war. That’s why Zelensky has lasted so long. He doesn’t give a flying fuck if every man between 18 and 40 dies—it’s not his people. That’s an enormous advantage.
[02:28:39] – [Warren]: If I were on a battlefield and got wounded or a drone was coming after me, it would give me satisfaction to know the guy piloting that drone chasing me might kill me, but there’s a chance some other Russian will launch a missile and blow up his base. That’s why it’s important. I haven’t read anything about it other than Scott Ritter talking about it, but it makes sense.
[02:29:13] – [Striker]: The Russians struggled at first with drone warfare, but they’ve gotten on top of it. They have counters for NATO technology now that they didn’t have before. They do interesting things like interfering with drone signals, causing them to drop to the ground. It’s remarkable.
[02:29:36] – [Warren]: There was an article from the New York Times about the drone stuff that was crazy. It showed a map of how much more drone usage there is now. This was from a week or two ago—“1000 Snipers in the Sky: War in Ukraine Drones Would Change the War.”
[02:30:10] – [Striker]: We said this before—drones are as big a change on the battlefield as the machine gun was. It’s that significant in the history of warfare. Drones have changed the whole dynamic, making war more impersonal and bloody, just like the machine gun did.
[02:30:28] – [Warren]: The article said, “The attack showed how an ever-evolving constellation of drones, largely off-the-shelf technologies turned into killing machines at breakneck speed, made the third year of the war in Ukraine deadlier than the first two years combined, according to Western estimates. Drones, not the big, heavy artillery the war was once known for, inflict about 70% of all Russian and Ukrainian casualties. In some battles, they cause even more, up to 80% of deaths and injuries.” When President Vladimir Putin sent troops into Ukraine three years ago, setting off the biggest ground war in Europe since World War II, the West rushed billions in conventional weapons into Ukraine to keep the Russians at bay. The insatiable battlefield demands nearly emptied NATO’s stockpiles. The war in 2022 showcased tanks, Howitzers, and dragon’s teeth, becoming a race between the West and Russia to pour conventional weapons like shells and tanks into the fight, turning eastern Ukraine into an artillery shooting gallery. Now drones rule the battlefield, surpassing conventional arms as the war’s most lethal weaponry—drone pilots, surveillance drones, attack drones, first-person view drones, jammer systems. It continued, “The war has killed and wounded more than a million soldiers in all, according to Ukrainian and Western estimates, but drones now kill more soldiers and destroy more armored vehicles than all traditional weapons combined—including sniper rifles, tanks, Howitzers, and mortars. Until recently, the clanging metallic explosions from artillery epitomized the war. Now it bears little resemblance to the early battles. Speeding cars or trucks no longer provide protection from faster-flying drones. Soldiers hike for miles, ducking into cover through drone-infested territory too dangerous for Jeeps, armored personnel carriers, or tanks. It’s become strangely personal as buzzing robots hunt specific cars or individual soldiers.”
[02:32:54] – [Striker]: This is playing a huge role in Kursk. The last thing I sent you is from a guy who translates Ukrainian war bloggers from Telegram into English. Remarkably, Trump was trying to get the Russians to negotiate while they still held Kursk. The Russians just destroyed that whole contingent of Ukrainian forces—they’re gone, dead, repelled from Kursk. The most amazing thing, Warren, is I haven’t seen a single word in American media about how the entire front in Kursk has been depleted, destroyed. The Russians have broken through. They have no reason to negotiate with America on its terms.
[02:33:49] – [Warren]: That’s why Putin is ahead in these talks.
[02:33:51] – [Striker]: There was a Ukrainian general on Telegram saying, “I warned the Ukrainian military we were going to lose everything in Kursk months ago.” They knew it was going to happen and let it happen anyway. At what point do patriotic Ukrainians in the military overthrow that illegitimate government?
[02:34:14] – [Warren]: They’re having big success right now. It’s funny how Russia has been single-mindedly focused on military objectives, separate from media stunts or the timing of presidents. They’re doing what Russians do—not political in that sense—just grinding on.
[02:34:57] – [Striker]: I have to disagree with what you’re going to say. I don’t think that’s true in this case, but go ahead.
[02:35:01] – [Warren]: They’re grinding on till they have one complete victory.
[02:35:05] – [Striker]: That’s not what they’re doing. The Ukrainians are doing that. The Russians are creating cauldrons, surrounding infantry forces, forcing them to retreat or die.
[02:35:22] – [Warren]: What I mean is they’re determined to grind on till they have one complete victory—not human wave tactics.
[02:35:39] – [Striker]: The Ukrainians are doing that.
[02:35:39] – [Warren]: There’s a psychological thing. When Napoleon’s army collapsed and withdrew from Russia, many allied powers in Europe, including some Russians, wanted to make peace or settle things. General Kutuzov thought, “We can’t go on,” but the tsar had this messianic drive: “We gotta stop Napoleon once and for all.” He carried it all the way to Paris. In World War II, the losses Russia suffered were immense, but they won. That’s where you get the Russian bear. In the early years of circuses, Barnum & Bailey in America pitted lions against bears—which is sick. As an animal lover—the lion always lost because lions go for a quick kill, while a bear, a grizzly, is a digging animal. The lion would lunge, and the bear would break its neck with its arm. Bears are tough as hell—thick-skinned. That’s in the Russian soul and their military history. That’s why Putin has this style with Trump—not impressed, not threatening, not saying, “We’re going to final victory,” just, “Oh, no. Hey, we’re for peace too—as long as all the conditions are met. You know, we want peace too.”
[02:37:46] – [Striker]: Listen to Samuel Bendett here, a translation from a military blogger: “To summarize, the Russian army has mastered a tactical technique of isolating the battlefield with modern means. With drones, the supply of Ukrainian forces was cut off. They had no options but to retreat. A cauldron was created for the Ukrainian forces, closed not by living soldiers but by robots, sharply reducing our losses on the Russian side. It didn’t allow Ukrainians to counterattack at the moment of closure and greatly thinned their battle formations during escape, almost completely destroying their armored vehicles and transport. This revolution was achieved by transitioning from quantity to quality of our drones and supporting forces. The concentration of strike assets, electronic warfare, reconnaissance, artillery, aviation, and coordination made it possible to solve this equation we’d been trying to solve since 2023. The speed of the collapse of the Ukrainian front section, where the most motivated units were concentrated, was unpredictable for most experts. This speed was achieved by mastering the art of isolating the battlefield, overcoming the impasse of positional warfare. There will be no remakes of Mariupol or Bakhmut. The war has changed, and both armies ran into a new positional war. The question was who would overcome this deadlock? The deadlock was caused by total reconnaissance and mass weapons, making large concentrations of equipment and personnel pointless. The way out was seen in the war of robots and the ability to fight with them, reassembling all other tactics.” They’re able to use drones to cut off Ukrainian supply lines, surround the living men with robots, and wipe them out. As they run away, pick them off. This is the worst year. We’re just three months into 2025, and it’s already the worst year of the war for the Ukrainians. There’s no reason the Russians need to sit at the table with America—they have all the leverage. Ukrainians have nothing in their hand. “The way out was seen in the war of robots and the ability to fight with them, to reassemble all other tactics in order to maneuver speed, without idiotic cries about the need for mass mobilization, lamentations that Russia’s at a dead end and can’t reach Kiev and Odessa in the coming years. The reality turned out different. Instead of mass mobilization, it was necessary to learn how to interact, prepare drone operators, prepare industrial capacities for UAV production, study the enemy, and look for new techniques. We need to pump up our brains, study, and fight with robots, not meat, humans. This revolution allows us to expect similar situations now in other parts of the front. Russian forces in Kursk concentrated some of the best drone operators, piloting fiber optic drones that extracted a heavy price on Ukrainian combat vehicles and equipment. As far as fighting with robots and not with meat, Russian forces still relied on continuous waves of human soldiers, Russian and North Korean, to take the battlefield, wave after wave. Still, Russians did learn many lessons.” This is commentary from Bendett, not the Russian blogger—his editorializing. The extent to which North Koreans have fought in this war is heavily disputed. This is some guy from the CSIS, Center for Security.
[02:42:32] – [Warren]: Here’s the video—Russian drone ambush tactics. A Rubicon center pilot, pseudonym Salient, flew to the crossroads and sat in ambush for retreating Ukrainian columns. Once the column passed, he lifted the drone from the ground and launched his attack with minimal warning. This drone stuff is really weird.
[02:42:57] – [Striker]: Now that the Russians have experienced this, survived it, and mastered it, it’s going to lead to a reshuffling of global military power. Everyone’s going to ask them for advice—not America. America’s not prepared for this.
[02:43:36] – [Warren]: My friends who were Iraq War veterans—guys I know from Iraq or Afghanistan—I think of that as our generation’s war. It’s totally different now. The US will have to deal with state actors like Iran. Even Iran by itself, if it didn’t have friends—
[02:44:07] – [Striker]: The Russians are getting a lot of their modern drones from Iran.
[02:44:11] – [Warren]: From the Iranians, yes. Exactly.
[02:44:14] – [Striker]: Think of the brilliance of central planning. The Iranians found all the smartest people in their country—average IQ of 86—through government planning. They identified the smartest minds, brought them together, and said, “We’re going to have the best drone program in the Middle East.” They planned this 10 years ago. It’s been a roaring success. It’s going to be a huge problem for Israel to even strike their nuclear program with this advantage.
[02:44:48] – [Warren]: I said this a year ago on this show, and it’s much more so today because we see how much tactics have evolved. The recent military experience of the United States is so far behind. That counts. When Americans went into Europe in 1917 or 1941, 1942, they did poorly. They had to learn the hard way against the Wehrmacht, who were extremely experienced. In the Battle of the Bulge, you had guys who’d never fought that kind of war against Hitler Youth who’d just come of age or veterans who’d been at war for six years. I’ve predicted consistently that Russia, with mass mobilization and cutting-edge experience, will come out of this as a top military power in the world on how to fight 21st-century war with that experience.
[02:46:13] – [Striker]: Think of Germany and Spain—not a one-to-one comparison, but Germany had experience in modern aerial warfare from Spain. They were ahead of the Anglo powers because of that experience.
[02:46:38] – [Warren]: Exactly.
[02:46:41] – [Striker]: I sent you something—
[02:46:42] – [Warren]: I’ll pull it up.
[02:46:44] – [Striker]: I sent you two things I want to talk about before super chats. The first is Sheryl Sandberg apparently trying to molest her junior staff. She was the one who bankrolled that Hamas rape documentary.
[02:47:03] – [Warren]: She bankrolled a film to justify the Gaza genocide with inflammatory, unsubstantiated claims of October 7th mass rape—claims Israel acknowledges there’s no proof for. Now it emerges she engaged in creepy behavior toward junior staff. Ex-Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg spent $13,000 on lingerie during a Euro trip and told a young female aide to come to bed on a private jet flight, according to an exclusive new memoir.
[02:47:40] – [Striker]: They managed to shut down a tell-all book about Facebook’s inner workings using lawfare. It’s never coming out.
[02:47:50] – [Warren]: That’s the least of it. Her former partner is an Epstein rapist, and she used her position at Facebook to cover up mass rapes at his company. Bobby Kotick is being played on social media for alleged connections with Jeffrey Epstein. An image shows a reference to him on Epstein’s list with an Activision email address. There he is on the list. She’s pushing the mass rape hoax—
[02:48:25] – [Striker]: She’s an Epstein person.
[02:48:26] – [Warren]: She herself is a rapist.
[02:48:29] – [Striker]: She’s with the Epstein people.
[02:48:31] – [Warren]: And covers—
[02:48:31] – [Striker]: Another mask-off moment was BAP making excuses for Epstein, saying those 13-year-old blonde girls set him up—filthy whores, he said. Scumbag. No one bought it. Everyone’s like, “Oh, you’re getting orders from Tel Aviv to say this.”
[02:49:00] – [Warren]: Social media executive who dated the Activision Blizzard CEO—what were they doing dating? A couple of big tech Jews. This stuff stinks to high heaven. This person used her Facebook position to cover up actual mass rapes. The Israeli regime chose her as their main Western asset to push the mass rape hoax because of her reputation as a Me Too, lean-in, epic girl-boss CEO feminist. In her mass rape documentary, she has a scene where she asks two proven hoaxers to show her photos of sexual violence. She withdraws in horror, but we never see the photos. Let’s watch this.
[02:50:00] – [Striker]: This is for people who say, “How could the Jews have faked the Holocaust?” You see how the sausage is made right here. This is how they do it. “You can identify her from her face. She was naked wholly. She had nails around her female organs.”
[02:50:28] – [Warren]: Let me see the actual documentary.
[02:50:40] – [Video]: If it’s okay, I’d like to see some of what you saw. (speaks Hebrew) As you can see, the body was brutal in different—Yeah.
[02:50:57] – [Warren]: Stages. It’s like the Holocaust, exactly.
[02:51:01] – [Striker]: It’s literally the whole Holocaust.
[02:51:02] – [Warren]: This is the best one.
[02:51:02] – [Video]: (Spanish) Over here, and over here, and over here. Oh my God. I feel like they’re the ones. What’s that there? That’s one foot, that’s the other foot. This is the body with the nails—
[02:51:26] – [Warren]: The creepy music, the whole thing.
[02:51:28] – [Video]: And the parts. When we get closer, you can see the nails.
[02:51:30] – [Warren]: Oh, and we can’t show you the proof.
[02:51:32] – [Video]: Oh my God. This is a piece of metal stuck to the skin.
[02:51:36] – [Warren]: This is so bad—like if you wanted to make a joke parody video—
[02:51:46] – [Warren]: About Holocaust propaganda and how it works—
[02:51:51] – [Striker]: That’s what I tell people. The Jews know the Holocaust never happened. Everyone thinks I’m crazy when I say that. Do Sheryl Sandberg and that other guy know the Hamas rapes never happened? They do. That’s why they don’t show the proof—just react to it in a poorly scripted way. Their acting is terrible.
[02:52:17] – [Warren]: They’re not even very good.
[02:52:20] – [Striker]: Oh God, that’s a foot. That’s a foot. Oh God.
[02:52:25] – [Warren]: One of my early videos from International Historic Films—when Pierce sold those tapes—was Hitler’s speech when he became Chancellor. Before he speaks, there’s a 10-minute clip with Goebbels. Everyone knows it from when he says, “Will shut their lying mouths.” If you watch the whole thing—hard to find online—it’s full of great, pithy Goebbels moments. They’d just taken power 10 days before. He says the Jews, even with control of the press and mass media, made their propaganda a piece of bungling. “All you could do was cover parliamentary scandals useless for building a new political base.” He goes on about how bad they were, then with his hand in his pocket says, “The National Socialists will show them how they should have handled it.” He’s this little sarcastic—the crowd goes wild. With the Jews, their propaganda isn’t based on being good at it—it’s nepotism and corruption. They control everything.
[02:54:06] – [Striker]: They also kill or imprison anyone who says it’s not true. This is why people say, “Daryl Cooper is helping more than hurting.” No, he’s a rearguard action. Seeing Jews manufacture a debunked hoax in real time makes people question all their other hoaxes.
[02:54:36] – [Warren]: Somebody said it’s like a Sam Hyde skit. It is though.
[02:54:49] – [Striker]: Daryl Cooper is nefarious because he steals David Irving’s work without giving credit. It’s one thing to do that with me—we’re relatively obscure here. With David Irving, you’re taking his groundbreaking insights on Churchill, his research—the only one the Nazis trusted with World War II documentation—bits and pieces without attribution. You don’t do it because you’re afraid someone might find the whole story. That’s the problem with people like Daryl Cooper. We don’t need him to mainstream anything. People see that Sandberg documentary and think, “Wow, this is like the Holocaust. I bet they’re lying about that too.” That’s just common sense.
[02:55:49] – [Warren]: It’s something—
[02:55:54] – [Striker]: Before we go to super chats, do the Drop Site Twitter thing I sent you.
[02:56:01] – [Warren]: Oh yeah, here we go.
[02:56:02] – [Striker]: This is crazy stuff they’re doing.
[02:56:09] – [Warren]: Columbia University has expelled, suspended, and temporarily revoked diplomas of dozens of students who occupied Hynes Hall during a pro-Palestinian protest last spring. In a campus-wide email Thursday, the university said its judicial board issued sanctions based on the severity of behaviors. This is the one with the truck going up—we covered it live on this show. They didn’t tally how many were expelled, suspended, or had degrees revoked. Here’s the email: “We are sharing outcomes of the disciplinary process from last spring. Sanctions range from multi-year suspensions, temporary degree revocations, and expulsions related to the occupation. For other events last spring, the UJB recognized prior disciplinary action. Suspended students’ return will be overseen by Columbia’s University Life Office. Columbia is committed to enforcing policies—the outcomes are based on the severity of behaviors and prior actions. These are the result of a thorough and rigorous process in the rules of university conduct.” That’s wild, but it’s not—
[02:57:47] – [Striker]: They take your college degree away for protesting against Israel.
[02:57:51] – [Warren]: Look, “Taking over Hamilton Hall as in 1968, Columbia students unfurl a banner reading ‘Hynes Hall’ for Hind Rajab, a six-year-old girl killed by Israeli forces. Hundreds cheer as it’s revealed, chanting ‘Free Palestine.’” I remember that.
[02:58:13] – [Striker]: I saw some shills saying, “Good, they’re getting the BLM rioters for doing it again.” Where are the burning McDonald’s? They burned down a Wendy’s, remember? Where are the looted stores? The burned Wendy’s? The dead people? It’s not the same. Those people got away with it. The ones who peacefully protest after the Israelis ritualistically murder a six-year-old girl are the ones punished.
[02:58:43] – [Warren]: They’re totally masked off. Let me see—there were a couple of other items here we haven’t hit. We got the Turkey stuff. Oh, the Syria stuff is just insane. Thousands of people were killed. We won’t play the videos on here because it’s horrible, but it’s finally breaking out into what happened with Libya. I think that’s what they want with Iraq too. This was funny—Syrian leader signs constitution that puts the country under an Islamist group’s rule for five years. There was an article in The Economist like, “Syria is now run by literal Al-Qaeda, but here’s why we should lift the sanctions.” They were saying if we don’t, it’s crippling Syria’s economy so badly—the price of bread has gone up like everything what it was.
[03:00:14] – [Striker]: I saw that they’re using Turkish money as their currency, and the Israelis don’t want that because it’s effectively going to be part of Turkey then.
[03:00:25] – [Warren]: They’re leaning more and more that way. It was funny to see The Economist making these claims boldface. Here’s the article: “Lifting sanctions on Syria seems mad until you consider the alternative.” It says the guy is Al-Qaeda, blood-soaked rebel group, HTS. “With a global trade war raging and the Transatlantic alliance fraying, you might think helping Mr. Sharra, which is al-Julani, is the last thing America should do. But unless it suspends sanctions on Syria now, the country faces economic collapse. It would then surely become a failed state and spread mayhem to its neighbors.” They said that as Syria’s politics stalls, its economy is in free fall. Damascus gets only a couple of hours of electricity a day. The price of bread has risen eightfold since December. People wait hours to withdraw the few bank notes available from cash machines. The flow of imports has risen, but a shortage of physical cash or digital payment options means few Syrians can buy them. In large part, this economic misery reflects ruin caused by decades of dictatorship, civil war, months of post-revolutionary chaos. But Western sanctions originally designed to punish the Assad regime are also to blame. These make the country radioactive for law-abiding foreign financial institutions, businesses, and governments. As a result, Syria cannot easily import physical currency, has limited access to the global banking system, and is struggling to generate export revenues.
[03:02:10] – [Striker]: The fact that they haven’t lifted the sanctions yet tells you America’s not totally in charge. This is gonna open the door for Russia, China, and even Iran. Look at how Iran was able to negotiate with the Taliban—now they’re like allies. It’s all because of America’s hard-headed approach—either I’m in total control or it’s not happening. That’s not how it’s gonna work anymore.
[03:02:41] – [Warren]: This I can show—no one’s actually getting shot here, but it shows a scene of the chaos. Marc Colette posted this—what’s going on in Syria. This is crazy.
[03:02:54] – [Striker]: The Feds are polluting that chat. You should just close it down if possible.
[03:03:05] – [Warren]: I can—
[03:03:07] – [Striker]: Just ban it.
[03:03:08] – [Warren]: There’s not that many of them.
[03:03:10] – [Striker]: The reason the Feds are doing this is because Emily is doing that event. We always say when you move from the internet into real life, that attracts FBI attention. Emily doing her event, which is her right, is what’s bringing all this FBI bullshit.
[03:03:31] – [Warren]: I think that, plus I know for a fact our Schmidt show last week broke through. I saw so many people talking about Schmidt in the last week. That show really made it break through the usual thing. It’s fun just following—
[03:03:55] – [Striker]: They’re going after Emily in particular because of that.
[03:04:01] – [Warren]: Oh, it’s great.
[03:04:01] – [Striker]: When you move from the internet to real-life events, no matter what it is, that’s when it triggers the FBI stuff. Keep your eyes peeled for that online, especially on Rumble—there’s no standards.
[03:04:27] – [Warren]: Let me show you this thing. Here it is—this is the video. Check this out—what’s going on in—
[03:04:43] – [Striker]: That’s barbaric. Look at that. Stop, I don’t wanna see that.
[03:04:50] – [Warren]: They’re not shooting anybody—they’re shooting—
[03:04:52] – [Striker]: No, they’re chopping someone’s head off.
[03:04:54] – [Warren]: No, they’re just hitting him with the butt of his gun.
[03:04:57] – [Striker]: Oh, okay.
[03:04:57] – [Warren]: Just look, the guy keeps beating on that person with his gun.
[03:05:14] – [Striker]: Oh, no.
[03:05:19] – [Warren]: Total animal chaos. Total anarchy. This—
[03:05:27] – [Striker]: I wouldn’t be surprised if the Israelis are playing a background role in that to create more tensions. They write about this openly. I was reading on the Times of Israel, they say stuff like, "We need to play all of our enemies off against each other all the time." Just out in the open saying this, especially at Syria’s they were saying. They’re blaming Assad loyalists. Bro, Assad is living in Moscow. Assad’s long gone. All those Alawites that were left behind are like, "Fuck Assad. He left us here to die." This has nothing to do with Assad.
[03:06:18] – [Warren]: There was one other thing, if I can find it here, because it was much earlier. Javier Milei has decided to open the state’s secret archives containing documents about Nazi officials and employees who fled to Argentina after World War II. During a meeting at the Casa Rosada, Milei promised full cooperation with the Argentine government with the Simon Wiesenthal Center, an organization founded by the renowned Nazi hunter. Documents reportedly reveal the financing of so-called escape routes used by the Nazis to flee Europe after the Holocaust. Thousands of Nazis avoided justice by using these routes. It’s estimated up to 10,000 war criminals found refuge in Argentina. Rabbi Avraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, highlighted the speed with which Milei acted compared to previous governments. According to Cooper, the Argentine president is the first to move decisively to clarify the country’s relationship with the Nazis before, during, and after the Holocaust.
[03:06:59] – [Striker]: Oh, my God. It’s a disgrace. My friend Milei. It’s a mystery as to who even supports Javier Milei. He has no actual base of support there. All he’s done in Argentina is make it a third world country with first world prices. That’s the only thing he’s done. It’s inexcusable for an apartment in Buenos Aires to cost the same as an apartment in New York City. That’s his landmark achievement.
[03:07:37] – [Warren]: There was another thing I saw on Justice Report. The Jewish private equity investor using the federal bureaucracy to tackle anti-Semitism. Josh Gruenbaum leads the Federal Acquisition Service, which oversees procurement and contracting for the entire federal government. According to Gruenbaum—
[03:08:04] – [Striker]: Can you put that on the screen? I want to talk about this. This is amazing. Jews are great at finding little empty offices with a laptop from the early 2000s and one employee. They figure out ways to weaponize those. It’s incredible. They are truly burrowing parasites. They find the one place with no defenses.
[03:08:33] – [Warren]: According to Gruenbaum, it’s an avenue for fighting anti-Semitism, as the position allows him to oversee lucrative government contracts, allowing him to cancel or not enter into contracts with partners who are out of step with the Trump administration priorities. He also agrees with Elon Musk’s vision of government efficiency. This is another great example, just like the RFK Jr. thing, of them weaponizing a part of the government that has nothing to do with race, anti-Semitism, religion, social justice, or civil rights. The health secretary declares anti-Semitism a public health crisis. Now the guy in charge of the Federal Acquisition Service overseeing procurement and contracting for the federal government—it’s top priority.
[03:09:27] – [Striker]: I saw a conservative intellectual saying, "I don’t like the Hamas people, but this is bad because you’re using powers in an abusive way, and one day, they’ll be used against conservatives." That person should listen to our episode on Schmidt. That’s not true. The reason Jews don’t feel this way, like, "I can’t open up this Pandora’s box, because one day it’ll be used on me," is they’re the sovereign. It’s never going to be used on them unless we overthrow the government. That’s when it’ll be used on them. They know that if they revoke someone’s citizenship or permanent residency because they teach a course critical of Israel, it’s not like Democrats are going to take power and do it to someone who’s pro-Israel. That’s not going to happen. They know this. They’re the sovereign. They can do whatever they want. The Constitution is meaningless. The rule of law is bullshit. It never existed.
[03:10:24] – [Warren]: I got some stuff here for Green Gang, I should say.
[03:10:30] – [Striker]: Oh, okay. A little bit of that.
[03:10:31] – [Warren]: No, it’s nothing to do with breeding or eugenics. Don’t worry. The Sierra Club put out a statement on the nomination of Tom Schultz to run the US Forest Service. This was actually pretty good. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins announced a timber lobbyist as the next head of the US Forest Service. Rollins named Tom Schultz as the next leader of the agency, tasked with overseeing 193 million acres of national forests and public lands, including 36.6 million acres of wilderness. Schultz has deep connections with the logging and timber industry. According to a release from the Department of Agriculture, Schultz served as vice president of resources and government affairs at Idaho Forest Group, where he led timber procurement operations and managed relationships with government officials. He also serves as director of the Idaho Department of Lands, facilitating mineral extraction on millions of acres of the state’s public lands. He is the most recent industry lobbyist picked by the Trump administration to lead an agency entrusted with stewarding public lands. Earlier this month, fossil fuel lobbyist Kathleen Scama was named to lead the Bureau of Land Management. The timber industry is jumping for joy with this nomination. He’s no outsider. He’s a consummate logging industry insider.
And here was one: the Jew they put in charge of the EPA is dismantling the EPA. This was by Joel Kotkin, who is this Jew trying to do the center populist thing, anti-woke right, kind of labor left for a while. I’ve been following that guy for a long time. How federal lands can be used to ease the housing crisis. He’s saying to open up tracts of federal land for housing construction. The housing market depends on interest rates and zoning, factors outside any president’s control, but the massive federal land portfolio gives middle and lower income Americans a better shot at home ownership. The federal government is the nation’s biggest landowner, holding one-third of all property. Federal lands brush up against the suburban periphery. To create affordable homes on federal lands, the federal government shouldn’t sell lands for development; it should lease them. The sale of federal lands requires the buyer to comply with state and local regulations once the land is privatized. I was annoyed by this because I really hate Joel Kotkin. He’s such a phony. The pieces are in place here. It’s the same thing that’s happening with everything with the Department of Government Efficiency. They’re just letting big capital and lobbyists loot the country.
[03:13:34] – [Striker]: On some level, I think even the elites have lost any faith in America surviving much longer. They’re just stealing. They’re using the wooden floors for firewood with this.
[03:13:52] – [Warren]: I saw an article saying the number of people at the 50-day mark in the Trump administration who have actually been deported. It’s on Justice Report. It’s a shockingly small number. Not shocking for us, but people should view it as pretty shocking how few people ICE has deported. I forget what it is. Like, 32,000 or something.
[03:14:26] – [Striker]: No, the ICE internal removals for February 2025 are lower than the ones from February 2024. Something ain’t right there. That’s not what we voted for. We didn’t vote to deport one Palestinian professor from Columbia. We voted to deport illegal alien criminals. Or illegal aliens, period, actually.
[03:14:45] – [Warren]: They’re saying that a lot fewer people are coming into the country, which is true. The big problem is the 50 million that are here. There wouldn’t be any need to open up federal lands like this to this cycle. The point of this press release by the Sierra Club is a logging industry executive. I know this from West Virginia. That’s the way it works. It’s always like, "We’re not going to let the spotted owl get in the way of jobs for regular people," and then all this rhetoric.
[03:16:11] – [Striker]: Philistine argument. Total ignorance.
[03:16:11] – [Warren]: Totally give away then to this kind of grug populism that fuels an argument that only benefits super wealthy elites in the resource extraction industries. Joel Kotkin with this article talking about, "What we need to do is use federal lands. This will house more people." Get rid of the 50 million that are here, which 60 percent of Americans want.
[03:16:38] – [Striker]: This just shows how controlled our discussions on everything from immigration to inflation are. Here’s common sense. If there’s more people who need to eat and live in houses, there’s more competition for food and housing. If there’s more competition for food and housing, supply and demand says, very simply, that the prices will go up. No, the answer to inflation is never more people. Having 40 or 50 million people that don’t even exist in the country on paper is an absolute disaster. The reason there’s no eggs in your store is because there’s too many people and not enough eggs.
[03:17:32] – [Warren]: Not enough chickens.
[03:17:35] – [Striker]: Too many people and not enough chickens. If you deported all the illegal aliens, inflation, the prices of everything would go down for simple supply and demand reasons. That’s why big business doesn’t want to do it. Anyone who’s lived in America their whole lives will notice that the quality of everything, from restaurant service to food to cars, is going down. Why is the quality going down while the prices keep going up? Very simple. The big businesses, the corporations have so much demand due to the artificially inflated population that would not be where it is were it not for an open border that they can slack off. They can cut corners. They’re still going to turn a profit because they don’t have to compete for your money. They have so many people and so few resources compared to the past, they can charge you $3,000 for a studio apartment in Queens because there’s so many illegal aliens that they’ll just lift 10 to an apartment. This is the problem. Immigration is the problem. The fact that Trump is literally not even doing as much as Biden on immigration—again, you’re just stupid if you’re still on the Trump train.
[03:19:11] – [Warren]: When you think about the White population, I made this for an episode I did on the environment a long time ago. When you look at the development in the United States from 2001 to 2024, there has been basically no increase. I think the White population, not just as a percentage, but in terms of the actual raw numbers, because of declining birth rates and everything, has gone down in the last 25 years. I think the African American population has not really naturally increased. It’s basically maintained itself. What increase you’ve had of Blacks is driven by immigration from Africa, but—what was the population of the United States in 2001? I’ll look it up. It’s now 330 million officially. In 2000, it was 282 million. That’s 50 million. We’ve gained 50 million people. What I showed here is this is what we’ve lost in terms of development, the country, since 2001. In the last 25 years, forests lost has been the whole state of California. That’s the equivalent of the forests that’s been lost. Why do you think there’s so many wildfires?
[03:20:49] – [Striker]: There’s a relationship there, you know?
[03:20:51] – [Warren]: And the farmland lost is as big as the entire state of Mississippi. There’s been no natural growth of the American population. It’s not been natural. 50 million people have come in and we’ve—Joel Kotkin comes along and the executives are like, "Well, we’ll just develop more land. We got all this land. Let’s just develop it. We’ll deport a few." This kind of stuff drives me crazy because that is just—
[03:21:19] – [Striker]: But it’s just making everyone’s living standards lower. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, even in New York City, there’s restaurants closing left and right because people don’t have money because they’re being nickeled and dimed everywhere. I saw a video the other day of Las Vegas. Las Vegas is always the first sign that a recession is coming. Las Vegas is empty. There’s nowhere to go in there. It’s all because of that greedy mindset of like, "Let’s charge people $15 for a bottle of water." I took someone to see a concert in Las Vegas a year ago because tickets used to be cheap. You could go to Vegas for 150 bucks. I went there just to see a concert with someone, and long story short, the tickets for the concert were like $200 a pop. I’m like, "What are you thinking?" The answer is there’s so many people that they can make up for the loss of people that can’t afford it. There’s enough people that can pay that.
[03:22:34] – [Warren]: You sent me a couple of things here. Okay. This fits with the theme. Thank you. "Trump takes an ax to more than a dozen pollution bills with rapid fire deregulation."
[03:22:46] – [Striker]: Imagine being one of these Make America Healthy Again people, voting for Trump. The guy is going to pollute the water. We’re going to have Mexican-style drinking water where you’re going to get the shits every time you even look at it.
[03:23:01] – [Warren]: The rivers will make rivers catch fire again.
[03:23:07] – [Striker]: Not for nothing, you can complain about the EPA all you want. No one who has been around long enough will tell you that even Los Angeles isn’t much cleaner than it used to be. I’ve seen videos, even when you watch old movies from the ‘80s of Los Angeles, you just see the smog everywhere. It’s a nasty looking place. You can thank the EPA for the clean air.
[03:23:34] – [Warren]: The same thing with Pittsburgh. I used to live on Mount Washington, which is up on the mountain looking down at the downtown. It used to be so bad there because of the steel mills and the slag and the coal and all this stuff. You could not see the downtown sometimes from the mountain, from the overlook, because it was so thick. That mountain, Mount Washington, was all just black slag stuff. It started in the late ‘60s and then in the ‘70s, the EPA and everything greened the whole city. Now you can go out there and it’s clear skies and it’s a big city.
[03:24:15] – [Striker]: And Trump is undoing all that.
[03:24:16] – [Warren]: He’s undoing it all.
[03:24:17] – [Striker]: Why? Why are people paranoid about some dye in their food and their candy, like, "My candy. We need to make food healthy like Steak ‘n Shake." Those same people neurotic about chemicals in their food are the same people that come out as a voting bloc for Trump, who actually poisons the air and the water.
[03:24:48] – [Warren]: The Union of Concerned Scientists said the Trump administration’s actions Wednesday would sacrifice human health for the benefit of private industry. The rollbacks will leave the nation sicker and our air, water, and soil dangerously contaminated. The Trump administration is attempting to subvert the EPA’s mission from protecting public health and the environment to boosting the interests of polluters and billionaires, called it a horrific day for people suffering from the burden of air and water pollution. The fact that it’s a Jew in charge of the EPA—I’m sure he’s finding some way for this to benefit Jewry too.
[03:25:29] – [Striker]: I’ve seen departments as out there as the USDA, which is in charge of our food, going out there and doing seminars on antisemitism. That’s not what it’s for. There’s apparently eggs back in the store now, right? They’re a little more affordable, but why don’t you make the eggs more affordable and make sure there’s never an egg shortage again before doing another seminar on antisemitism with the USDA? Come on. The Trump administration is going to discredit the conservatives for a century.
[03:26:18] – [Warren]: What’s funny is the only reason they got in is because the liberals are literally talking about taking little kids and chopping their penises off and letting Black rioters run through cities burning and looting while abolishing the police.
[03:26:28] – [Striker]: Letting criminals out and then abolishing the police. That’s exactly what they’re doing.
[03:26:36] – [Warren]: You run on a position like it’s a zombie apocalypse, you know, the little breakaway thing there. You run on a position of "We want to make America Haiti again, only with trannies." Like tranny Haiti is what we want. I think trannies wouldn’t do that well in actual Haiti, you know? Your policy is so abhorrent to normal people that they’ll say, "Oh, yeah, he said this," and then he’s like, "Okay, well, you voted for me, so now I’m going to poison your water."
[03:27:20] – [Striker]: I sent you one on the executive orders. Here’s another thing—
[03:27:21] – [Warren]: It’s the recent bottom.
[03:27:21] – [Striker]: Another problem is that the US government is so badly designed. It’s designed literally to do maximum harm to the maximum number of white people. That’s what every single thing in the US government is doing. Look at this.
[03:27:36] – [Warren]: Oh, God. Jordan lays out timeline for tackling high-skilled tech visas immigration overhaul.
[03:27:42] – [Striker]: The Jordans disown this Jordan. Have a conversation with this Jordan. If your surname is Jordan, aside from Blacks and stuff, you probably have a Norman Crusader as a paternal ancestor. That’s why every country in Europe has Jordans. You’re literally a paternal descendant of crusaders, so I probably have an ancient ancestor that killed Jews.
[03:28:18] – [Warren]: This is why this Jordan—this Jordan is crusading—
[03:28:24] – [Striker]: This Jordan, on the other hand...
[03:28:24] – [Warren]: He’s crusading for high-skilled tech visas. He’s redirected his Viking ancestry. It’s like, "Rah, I will attack. I will attack tech and flood it with bajeets."
[03:28:38] – [Striker]: Jordan is a great example of a MAGA grifter who has no discernible talents. He’s dumb. He’s of low intelligence. He’s not articulate. He’s not charming. He doesn’t really have any insights into what the people want. He’s just someone who rode Trump’s coattails.
[03:29:02] – [Warren]: Jordan lays out timeline for tackling high-skilled tech visas immigration overhaul efforts, but first Republicans need to pass their party line bill to enact larger components of the president’s domestic agenda. He has a strategy for how to give President Donald Trump’s top ally, Elon Musk, the changes to high-skilled visa rules the tech billionaire desperately wants. He’s eyeing his party’s flagship immigration bill as the legislative vehicle for overhauling existing laws to increase the flow of immigrants. That’s a phrase after this mandate, this election, it should just be stricken from the public conversation. Nobody wants that—increase the flow of immigrants into the United States with expertise in science, technology, and engineering. But he made it clear he wouldn’t be the driving force behind making those changes to so-called H-1B visas, which let tech companies hire foreign-born experts. They have support among some Republicans, but far from the majority of GOP lawmakers. Rather, Jordan said, he would expect the H-1B overhaul to come up as one of any number of concessions Republicans might make to sway Democrats in the Senate, who will be needed to—
[03:30:24] – [Striker]: You want to screw the public this way, we want to screw the public this way. Let’s compromise, you know?
[03:30:31] – [Warren]: Let’s do both.
[03:30:32] – [Striker]: You ask us to vote to screw the public in the way they want.
[03:30:38] – [Warren]: What’ll probably happen is there’ll be a handful of Republicans from swing states that won’t vote for it. They’ll just make up for it with safe Democrats in blue states. The irony about these senatorial votes that are unpopular is the senators that tend to vote for the shittiest policies, the Republicans that betray the base, are the ones in safe red districts. If you’re from Wyoming or North Dakota or places like that where there’s no Democrat within a thousand miles capable of beating you, or Ohio, which is now a red state, those are the ones that sell their base out the hardest. It’s the ones in swing states that don’t want to put their name to this. They’ll call this a triumph of bipartisanship. Trump will make a big deal out of it. "The Democrats love me. I think we got come back and pass the bill and send that to the Senate, I think we—both chambers would then start that debate on what happens with various visa programs we have, whether it’s high-skilled one, whether it’s agricultural workers, whether it’s what happens to Dreamers." Oh my God, there it is. They’ll say, "Democrats, will you increase the H-1B people the way Elon wants?" And they’ll say, "Not unless you legalize all the Dreamers." And they’ll be like, ah. We have to compromise here. We have to come together and we both give a little.
[03:32:40] – [Striker]: Let’s do the worst of both worlds.
[03:32:42] – [Warren]: We both give a little for the good of America. We come together at the top.
[03:32:46] – [Striker]: Oh, God. Come on, it’s been wonderful.
[03:32:48] – [Warren]: We have to legalize the Dreamers because otherwise we’re not going to get the thing that Elon wants. Then the Democrats will be like, "Well, we gotta give Elon his high-tech workers because for the Dreamers, you know?" That’s how it works. That’s how it’s always been done. This is what John Kerry used to do. This is what John McCain used to do. This is what the Affordable Care Act was. Obamacare was basically both sides making sure that the thing got the parasites rich and didn’t benefit the people. This is how the sausage is made, as they say.
[03:33:32] – [Striker]: The upside of this is that if America embraces mass immigration without any caveats, which is what they’re going to do, then as America declines, most of the world’s going to see that and be like, "We gotta do the opposite of what they’re doing." Including Europe, actually. Europe is going to make a very strong pivot against immigration in the coming years as American influence declines here. Simply for survival.
[03:34:15] – [Warren]: Look at this language. Boy, this is a find, man. "It’s also the first time Jordan has articulated its long-range vision for overhauling immigration policy." I love these euphemisms—overhauling, this, that. "Including an area that’s important to Musk, with whom the committee chair enjoys a longtime rapport." Again, objectively, who elected Elon Musk? The only reason he has this sway is because he’s literally the richest man on Earth.
[03:34:44] – [Striker]: Trump is now literally doing paid advertisements for Tesla as the president. My question though is, is Elon Musk all that brilliant of a businessman? Think about how stupid his strategy is here. He’s known for really expensive electric cars. Who buys them? Wealthy libtards. They’re the only people that buy that. Because even wealthy Republicans buy big trucks. They don’t buy small cars. He’s basically destroying his consumer base for his cars and politicizing his company in a way that doesn’t even make sense to politicize. It makes perfect sense for Starbucks to support Black Lives Matter. It makes no sense for Tesla to be politicized in the MAGA direction. If his interest is putting his business ahead of things, he’s doing a really bad job of that. I’ve seen libtards getting rid of their Teslas, selling them for half the price and stuff. Libtards are just getting rid of all of it. It’s not like conservatives are going to buy Teslas. They don’t like electric cars.
[03:35:51] – [Warren]: The first guy I ever knew that talked to me about Elon Musk was a very liberal boomer who was telling me about this genius, Elon Musk, and how he admired him so much. That was Elon Musk’s first biggest fan that I ever met and talked with, and he told me about Elon Musk and why he’s so—and now that guy who I talk to from time to time totally hates Elon Musk now. It’s really funny because I tease him about it. But look at this. Jordan has a longtime rapport with Elon Musk. Musk has framed the push for high-skilled immigrants as a top priority for the Trump administration. Now, again, somebody might say, "Well, who the hell asked him?" Well, Trump has backed Musk in his fight with immigration restrictionists over increases to skilled visas or green card exemptions for high-tech workers. That’s it. If you are loyal to Trump over the principles you have to choose. Right there, you have to choose, because Trump is siding with Musk and against the what, 60% of Americans that want no new immigration reform.
[03:37:09] – [Striker]: Every time they tap their little influencer club, the lowest of the low social media influencers are Musk toadies, Musk suck-ups. They’re literally the most bottom of the barrel people. Those people now are caught with their pants down. They’re going to have to figure out a way to play this off because Musk and Trump are going to do this. They’re going to substantially increase the illegal immigration population. They’re going to do it.
[03:38:02] – [Warren]: Right. It’s something that with Elon Musk and Donald Trump, this is what I said about the Keith and Parrot and Brad Griffin crowd—just that—look, you can say national socialists are losers or that there’s no place for national socialism in America, and I can argue with you. We can point out, as people have, nobody’s had any success. Now, they certainly look successful. I made the argument also that Robert E. Lee lost, Hitler lost, Jesus Christ lost the first time—
[03:38:53] – [Striker]: Well, they lost the war.
[03:38:54] – [Warren]: The point is, though, the people who win this argument are Elon Musk and Donald Trump. They close the case. I use that example of this horrible whore that, when I was a young man, I used to simp for her because I thought she was great. Back then, I had the gift of gab, so I would convince all my friends that she’s great. Then she would do something where I would be like, "Oh my gosh. They’re all right." That’s what it is with Trump and Elon Musk. They will sink the knife in your back every time. They’re the scorpion; it’s their nature.
[03:39:38] – [Striker]: What are they doing for you? Is my question. So you’re toadying for Musk and Trump. What are they doing for you? Maybe individually, they give you clout. Or maybe they open up a stream of income from Jewish donors or whatever they’re looking for. From a Jewish perspective, he got retweeted by Elon Musk. What do you get out of it?
[03:40:01] – [Warren]: Literally. This is what it is. Keith Woods got retweeted by Elon Musk a couple of times. Brad Griffin got retweeted by Keith Woods. Matt Parrott got retweeted—or got boosted by it. Some nobody that turns out is a Jew got boosted by Keith Woods. That’s the chain we’re dealing with here. You know what I mean? It’s not—
[03:40:27] – [Striker]: Oh man, another airplane blew up. American Airlines flight 1006.
[03:40:34] – [Warren]: Oh, you mean literally?
[03:40:35] – [Striker]: Yeah, it landed and it just caught fire.
[03:40:40] – [Warren]: Oh wow. Okay. That’s the other thing. Nobody wants to fly.
[03:40:45] – [Striker]: Oh no, I don’t want to fly.
[03:40:48] – [Warren]: The last five times I’ve flown have been horrible experiences. Some of the worst experiences in dealing with a customer service situation in my entire life.
[03:41:00] – [Striker]: Air travel, air transportation cannot survive the third world deregulation path we’re on. It’s not going to survive that. You’re going to have to drive everywhere.
[03:41:12] – [Warren]: But yeah, the sucking up to Elon and Trump, I hope—I hope you guys are getting paid for it because, you know... Even then, why don’t you find something more respectable to do? There’s a lot of these—
[03:41:30] – [Striker]: Yeah, or suck cock. Sucking cock is more respectable. No seriously, sucking cock for $10 is more respectable than sucking up to Elon Musk. Yo, Destiny has more dignity than the Elon Musk.
[03:41:46] – [Warren]: Dignity is the key word.
[03:41:49] – [Striker]: He’s got more dignity.