WarStrike 88
SOURCE: Video
Referenced Documents:
Non-Profit Behind Charlottesville "White Supremacy" Lawsuit Is Lining Roberta Kaplan's Pockets
Soviet Union Style Justice in America: The Political Prosecution of Robert Rundo
The Road to Stalingrad: Stalin’s War with Germany, Vol. 1
[00:10:18] – [Warren]:
I just finished this book, The Jew as Criminal.
[00:10:26] – [Striker]:
It was better than I thought it would be. Oh, man. It was better than I thought it would be. I have stuff… We can do Trump stuff later. Let’s just do this first while we have it fresh and since you just read it. What’s remarkable about it is that Jews are still committing the same crimes.
[00:10:49] – [Striker]:
Down to fencing, you know? I have some of my own research to add to the discussion about how fencing, the practice of fencing, is still in their hands.
[00:11:03] – [Warren]:
Receiver of stolen goods, for anyone who doesn’t know what that means. That’s what they used to call it.
[00:11:07] – [Striker]:
Something clicked in my mind while reading this. It’s just telling you things that are right in front of you, but because our minds are cognitively polluted by lies, it doesn’t occur to you. He makes a great point:
Without the fence, there is no thief. [The Jew as Criminal, paraphrased, p44]
There would be no shoplifting without the introduction of capitalism to the underworld, and they make it clear. Thieves can be of any race. In Germany, they might be Gypsies or even Germans. In America, they’re usually Black, or the organized thieving groups are.
I think the ones burglarizing the homes of NFL players were a gang of Chileans from Chile. However, in my own research, I found out they were kicking up the stolen goods to a Jewish pawn shop in the Diamond District. We think of Jews as pawnbrokers, right? But what is a pawnbroker more times than not? It’s a fence—a place where you take illicitly procured goods, they don’t ask questions, buy it from you, and then resell it.
All of a sudden, it all makes sense. Why are all the pawn shops in the hands of Jews? Even the famous one from Pawn Stars. Those guys present like they’re Scots-Irish or something, but they’re actually Jews. This is a very age-old practice, and it’s remarkable.
They’re talking about people stealing the jewels from the Romanovs. I didn’t know this! It blew me away. After the Jewish Bolsheviks killed the Romanov family, a group of Jewish jewelers came to where the killing happened right after and stole all their jewels! It’s remarkable. Crazy.
[00:13:20] – [Warren]:
Yeah. What I have on the screen there is Fagin receiving stolen goods from Sykes from Oliver Twist. The funny thing is that Sykes is the murderer who kills out of rage. But mainly, he’s a burglar and a thief—the savage goy who takes all the risks. Then he brings stuff to Fagin, who gets it and sells it without taking any risks.
That’s one of the things mentioned throughout this book. The Jews are usually the ones not taking the biggest risks. You’ll have a Jewish pimp more often than Jewish prostitutes, though there are Jewish prostitutes, they make that point. Generally, the Jew is the middleman, especially at the top echelon.
They make that point several times, whether it’s what they called white slavery back then—now we’d call it human trafficking or sex trafficking—or gangsters in the United States. It’s interesting; the book was written in 1937. They say the people associated with gangsters in the public mind are Italians, particularly Neapolitans and Sicilians, but at the highest level, it’s predominantly Jews.
That’s a really interesting point. All this crime going on is high risk for the reward, but the Jew is always one step behind. I had the same thought about the fence—it makes perfect sense.
[00:15:46] – [Striker]:
That makes perfect sense. If there’s no way to launder the stolen goods, there’s no stealing. You’d have no way to do it. You could put a blanket out on the street—I’ve seen people do that in New York—but generally, you just get caught if you do that. You need a way to launder it. I was astonished doing my own research, wondering who the fences are today.
The answer is Ruby Rubinov. He was arrested in New York City a couple of years ago for running a big shoplifting operation after the BLM riots. Then there’s another one, Dmitry Novitsky or something, in the Diamond District. In the last couple of years, there’s been a trend of famous athletes’ houses being burglarized while they’re playing away games. The feds arrested the person receiving all the stolen goods—millions of dollars—and it was some Russian Jew in the Diamond District.
I’m pretty sure they mentioned the Diamond District as a fence in this book, or they had their own in Germany. It’s remarkable. They’re exactly the same as 100 years ago. They haven’t evolved one bit.
[00:18:03] – [Warren]:
No, I’ll tell the audience, the book we’re reviewing today is The Jew as Criminal by Jay Keller and Dr. Hanns Andersen, published in Leipzig in 1937, translated by R. Belser. It’s excellent. It has an introductory word from Julius Streicher, and we were joking on the last show about how even Hitler said, “It’s important not to go too far.” But it’s right up there in terms of scholarship and intelligence.
[00:18:53] – [Striker]:
It’s not written by Julius Streicher. It’s by two PhDs, Dr. Jay Keller and Hanns Andersen, academics in Germany in 1937.
[00:19:08] – [Warren]:
It’s refreshing to read a work by people who really understand Jews. When they talk about religious Jews who are actually racial Jews, it’s a settled issue in Germany at the time—the Jewish baptism is a joke.
[00:19:42] – [Striker]:
They make a great point that most Western Jews don’t live by the rules of the Talmud but by its spirit. That’s what’s so wrong with them.
[00:20:01] – [Warren]:
They address the old claim you still hear today—like David Duke wrote in his book about Jesus boiling in excrement in the Talmud. Jews counter that by saying the Talmud is obscure gibberish no one follows. But they say it’s the spirit of the thing. It wouldn’t be their central religious text if it didn’t align with who they are and their psyches.
[00:20:50] – [Striker]:
Their racial psyche. They point out that Jews are interested in physical characteristics but deny psychic differences in races. These two academics say that’s nonsense. The Jew as imposter—every chapter is mind-blowing. One thing that blew my mind is that Jews were committing crimes four years into Hitler’s reign.
[00:21:31] – [Warren]:
Yes, and they’re going before a court. Why didn’t they just take these Jews out and shoot them? Instead, a court sentenced them to imprisonment.
[00:21:49] – [Striker]:
They’re beating their cases through corruption and appeals. It’s unbelievable. It shows how exaggerated the American understanding of totalitarianism is. There was a vibe shift in the Third Reich, but plenty of Jews were still doing Jewish stuff.
[00:22:16] – [Warren]:
Yeah, Goebbels wrote in an article on the Calvin site, when they instituted the wearing of the Jewish star, that one couldn’t believe so many Jews were still in Berlin. It’s the middle of World War II, the Third Reich fighting multiple enemies, and they still have thousands of Jews running around in Berlin.
As the Jews first appeared several weeks ago on the streets of Berlin graced with their Jewish star, the initial reaction of the citizens of the Reich capital was surprise. Only a few knew that there were still so many Jews in Berlin. Everyone suddenly found someone in the neighborhood who seemed like a harmless fellow citizen, who perhaps complained or criticized a bit more than normal, and whom no one had thought to be a Jew. He had concealed himself, mimicked his surroundings, adopting the color of the background, adjusted to the environment, in order to wait for the proper moment. [The Jews are Guilty!]
Late in the book, there’s a point that the czar’s secret police was effective but had the fatal flaw of relying on Jewish informants. It’s like having Jewish Gestapo agents—conventional thinking might suggest getting Jews loyal to the Third Reich to betray their own for money, like with white informants in nationalist movements.
But it’s ridiculous. You’d just have Jews infiltrating the Gestapo, showing why the Third Reich had to be annihilated from without, not defeated from within by Jews. Let’s go chronologically. In the introduction, there’s a paragraph that gives the flavor of the book. They say it’s not just about money with Jews. Intelligent anti-Semites stress this, but poorly educated ones think Jews are only motivated by money, which is a dangerous delusion.
[00:25:17] – [Striker]:
No way. Why would they be Bolsheviks if they felt that way? They talk about Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet Union’s foreign minister during its most aggressive period—like the Spanish Civil War and restoring relations with the US in 1933 with Morgenthau. His brother was a rabbi, and his sister was a criminal—an amazing story in the chapter on the Jew as imposter.
[00:26:19] – [Warren]:
There are many details about individuals and stories. Keller, who died finishing the book, has a wonderful tribute from his co-author, speaking to their decency. The most vile chapter is on the Cheka, followed by a sensitive tribute to Keller, a German from Russia. The book focuses on recent Russian history, much of it forgotten today. Here’s a great paragraph you could apply today with Gaza:
Without the solution of the Jewish Question, there is no salvation for the peoples of the world.
This realization has blazed a trail in Germany; in increasing measure, it is becoming the common property of all nations of culture.
Despite the fierce and fiery reaction of its blind or bought allies, the disastrous role of the Jew, this parasite upon the body of every people is being drawn more and more into the light of day. Everywhere where morality, law, and order succumb to disintegration, where racketeering and corruption devour the economy, where materialistic dialectics undermine the foundations of faith, where Marxist propaganda transforms politics into a criminal reality, where the healthy race of the people is made sick and desecrated -- there one meets everywhere the tracks of the Jew.
That is the historical experience of every century and of all peoples. [The Jew as Criminal, p6]
[00:28:09] – [Striker]:
In my research on the Weimar Republic, after World War I, there was a Conference on the Jewish Question hosted by Jews who wrote the Weimar Constitution—like Rathenau. They sold it to German authorities as a way to get a better outcome from the Treaty of Versailles, promising a liberal democracy where Jews were enfranchised for a better shake from Woodrow Wilson. When people hear ‘Jewish question’ and ‘solution,’ they think Holocaust, but the Jews were the first to debate it—Zionists versus assimilationists.
[00:29:58] – [Warren]:
There was nothing sinister meant by the Jewish question. The chapter on the Cheka shows how Nazi atrocity stories are projections of what they did in Russia, Spain, and Hungary—some of the worst atrocities ever committed. Then they project onto the Third Reich this legacy of absolutely some of the worst atrocities ever committed. But yeah, there’s this line about money, and they come back to this point later in the book:
The Jew is fundamentally and basically criminal. Crime is, for him, the form of existence inherent in him. He is continuously and inescapably on the attack against the natural laws of order of the Volksgemeinschaft [= ethnic community] and the communal life of the various peoples. It is by no means money per se for which he strives. This view is a dangerous prejudice, which is apt to divert the gaze of the investigator and the politician from the essence. Money is for the Jew only a means to an end, the end goal is, for him, always the conquest of power, the usurpation of unlimited power over people. The entire content of the socalled 'religion' of Judaism and its Chosen status is a mere monstrosity of its morbid greed for power. Thus its 'religion' is directed against God, its Law against Right, its morals against morality. [The Jew as Criminal, p7]
[00:31:38] – [Striker]:
I had never read this book or heard about it until some of my research last weekend. It all is perfect. I thought I was coming up with this stuff, but someone else did it before me. They had their number way before us. That’s why it’s so important to read these books and talk about them. We’re far behind Germans in the 1930s.
[00:32:28] – [Warren]:
So did Luther, so did Voltaire. These guys reference a lot of great figures, not so much distant historical figures, but more recent history, like the last century before National Socialism. There are figures in Russia or Hungary that I looked up, and man, people knew. There was always somebody, the based antisemite, like a minister or a general or a scholar who’s onto them. The Jews remember them.
[00:33:28] – [Striker]:
That’s why Jews do things like Katyn Forest. They kill your military officers, your academics, your intellectual elites. Then you have an Idiocracy where someone like the My Pillow guy rises to power.
[00:33:47] – [Warren]:
Or stuff like “the good Jews don’t believe in this”, or the “anti-Zionist” Jews.
[00:34:45] – [Striker]:
The anti-Zionist Jews aren’t against Zionism for ethical or humanitarian reasons. They’re anti-Zionist because they believe in the Old Testament and the Talmud, which say there can be no Israel until the Messiah returns. It has nothing to do with the Palestinians; they don’t care about that.
[00:35:20] – [Warren]:
Reading this book, the anti-Zionist Jew in a pro-Palestine organization is like a Jew coming to the Czarist secret police saying, “I’m a pro-Czarist Jew, let me join.” It’s ridiculous.
[00:35:58] – [Striker]:
In my book, I have a whole thing on Jews pretending to be for the Kaiser, then stabbing him in the back when they saw an opportunity. When liberals were about to take power and thought the Kaiser would abdicate, the Jews in the newspapers became anti-monarchists. When the Kaiser made it clear he wasn’t going to abdicate, they went back to being Wilhelmites. They’ll stab you in the back if you help them and kill you if you oppose them.
[00:37:04] – [Warren]:
There’s a hilarious line by Goebbels where he says,
If they think they can now with flags flying come over and join our movement, we can only give them the answer, please don’t go to any great expense. [Paraphrased from Sportpalast Speeches - 06:15]
It’s just laughing at them.
[00:37:37] – [Striker]:
There were attempts by Jews to be Nazis towards the end of the Weimar Republic. There was a reactionary Jew who was all about the Hohenzollerns and German patriotism, trying to get in with the Nazis, and they were like, “Nah, how about you not?”
[00:38:22] – [Warren]:
They did it with Mussolini and fascism. Whenever there’s a right-wing movement, you get swamped with Jews coming out of the woodwork.
[00:38:54] – [Warren]:
His body language and sarcasm are hilarious.
[00:39:57] – [Striker]:
That deadpan German sarcasm is painful. I’ve seen it in my own life.
[00:40:06] – [Warren]:
I’ve seen it when I show up late to meet Germans. They freak out even if you’re one or two minutes late.
[00:40:30] – [Striker]:
If we were a German livestream starting 20 minutes late, we’d have zero people watching.
[00:41:03] – [Warren]:
Goebbels saying,
If they think they can now with flags flying jump over to our side,
and then just laughing,
Please don’t go to any great expense,
is classic. The first chapter is more for German speakers. Yiddish and German are similar, and they show how criminal slang in German comes from Yiddish.
[00:41:34] – [Striker]:
Think of even in English, like “vig” from mafia movies—it’s a Yiddish term for the cut or interest rate. Or “shyster,” which is some kind of Jewish reference.
[00:42:23] – [Warren]:
They say,
… [F]or the Jews, the village dweller, the peasant, is always despised as the fool, the dumb guy, but is valued as a source of gain.
For the Jews, the village dweller, the peasant is always despised as the fool, the dumb goy, but is valued as a source of gain. … The number of linguistic examples could be extended at will -- they prove that substantially, the leading class of the criminal element has always consisted of Jews. [The Jew as Criminal, p15]
They don’t overplay the percentages of Jews. This is the Third Reich in 1937, a one-party state with a Ministry of Propaganda, but they don’t feel the need to exaggerate because they have the truth on their side.
[00:43:48] – [Striker]:
Why would you need to do that if you have the truth? I used to complain on Stormfront about people posting things like a rabbi getting a DUI. That’s not what we’re talking about. We all commit small-time crimes. They’re talking about systematic crime where Jews are the nucleus, the brains, the organization. They introduce the rules of capitalism to the underworld, incentivizing more crime. They target the legal system in liberal democracies to get away with crime. Think of great Jewish lawyers like Alan Dershowitz, known for getting OJ Simpson off, not for noble things.
[00:46:04] – [Warren]:
Alan Dershowitz is the personification of the Jewish attorney. George Soros is a symbol of funding left-wing causes, but Dershowitz represents the Jewish legal mind. Prohibiting Jews from controlling the media, lending money at interest, and monopolizing the legal system would be top measures against them. The legal system is their passkey to unlock the system for all other stuff.
[00:47:35] – [Striker]:
Dershowitz is culturally known as the greasy, evil Jew, but there are more like him, like Roberta Kaplan, who sued Trump for rape and won, but had to resign from her #MeToo law firm for trying to save Harvey Weinstein. Jewish lawyers win not because of superior verbal IQ, but because they have connections. They control the choke points of information, law, politics, and finance. Roberta Kaplan’s connections are why cases like Sines v. Kessler were rigged.
[00:49:24] – [Warren]:
Four Jews were the attorneys on Kaplan’s team. Kaplan’s a joke; she’s not a good lawyer at all. She’s incompetent. The other one, Karen Dunn, was smart and good. The male lawyer had a classic New York accent, like an imitation of a Jewish attorney.
[00:50:14] – [Striker]:
I could hear people from that part of Virginia, probably rural, watching this nervous little Jew saying, “You have to rule against the hate.” Maybe that’s why they weren’t able to succeed on the federal claims. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind is part of Trump’s antisemitism crackdown now. They sued them, and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind rolled over, signing a memorandum with the Trump administration to work on the antisemitism executive order and defend it. They’re not liberals; they’re working with Trump now.
[00:51:40] – [Warren]:
It reminded me of the [George Lincoln] Rockwell clip where he realizes all the people he was talking against were Jewish. During the trial, I positively identified Karen Dunn as Jewish, and it was shocking that all four attorneys were Jewish. It’s crazy how this goes unnoticed.
The individualistic ethos of the West, especially in America, prevents people from seeing ethnic networks like Jewish nepotism and tribalism. If you don’t consider that, you’ll miss it and think it’s just about education or intelligence. Scott Adams tried to say Jews are just more educated, but it’s more about their network. Americans are too individualistic to see it.
Jews aren’t individually that good; many have flaws like greed or corruption, like Netanyahu. Roberta Kaplan’s nonprofit for the Charlottesville lawsuit was a slush fund, with 60-70% self-dealing. They don’t overemphasize percentages, but in some fields, it’s overwhelmingly Jews. Statistics are based on religious denomination, not race, so baptized Jews aren’t counted.
[00:58:15] – [Striker]:
In my research, the real number of Jews in power is underestimated because it only counts religious Jews, not ethnic or half-Jews.
[00:58:29] – [Warren]:
My Charlottesville case has been distributed for conference with the Supreme Court tomorrow. Glen Allen interviewed Rob Rundo, detailing the Soviet-style treatment he endured. Glen’s a talented lawyer who made a lot out of little, fighting rigged systems. Glen says Rundo’s case shows police state conduct and the media’s power to create an alternate reality. A ProPublica article led to his indictment and brutal treatment.
[01:02:36] – [Striker]:
The ProPublica piece was likely a joint operation between intelligence services and the media, using Patriot Act means to target people. Federal officials, many of whom are unqualified, get their cues from the media. They even released the Menendez brothers based on a Netflix documentary.
[01:04:26] – [Warren]:
Ken Klippenstein mentioned Biden pardoning criminals, highlighting how the system works. Honest journalists are crucial. They can expose vulnerabilities in the system, like how the US funds investigative journalists for regime change.
[01:07:32] – [Striker]:
Investigative journalism is hard to fund, but platforms like Substack allow independent funding. When I did National Justice, I had to make personal sacrifices because no one would fund me. Only people that commit political crimes get the death penalty.
[01:08:33] – [Warren]:
So, here’s what Ken Klippenstein wrote, and I thought this was a great point because he’s right. He said,
Charging individuals with terrorism or labeling them as terrorists is inherently a political decision on the part of the government. Currently there are only three individuals in American jails awaiting execution for crimes labeled terrorism:
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev — motivated by jihadist content, he carried out the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013, killing three people and injuring over a hundred more.
Robert D. Bowers — motivated by anti-semitism, he carried out a mass shooting at the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh in 2018, killing 11 worshipers.
Dylann Roof — motivated by white supremacy, he carried out a mass shooting at a black church in Charleston in 2015, killing nine worshipers.
When former President Joe Biden commuted the death sentences of all but these three federal inmates last year, the reason he passed them up was not because of the severity of their crimes, but because of the sensitive politics involved. The 37 death sentences Biden commuted included unspeakably heinous crimes, like that of Kaboni Savage, the Philadelphia drug lord who murdered a dozen people, including four children he burned alive (!)
What separates the three cases from the others isn’t the body count, but the political motives involved. That’s why they alone did not receive commutations; and is why Mangione is facing the death penalty today. [Luigi Mangione Becomes A Political Prisoner]
[01:10:13] – [Striker]:
I hate this system so much.
[01:10:15] – [Warren]:
But isn’t that a great point? You’ve taught me the value of just stating it, even understating the ridiculous scenario. He said there’s politics involved, but when you compare it to someone who buried four kids alive, it’s clear.
[01:10:48] – [Striker]:
Did any Jews get hurt? Did any powerful rich people get hurt? No. Just four kids, probably Black kids. That person should have been executed by now.
[01:11:01] – [Warren]:
I like to see someone who isn’t on our side making this point. If you look into the crimes of the people whose sentences were commuted, it’s shocking. I remember vividly when they executed Timothy McVeigh. That was a big deal.
[01:11:34] – [Striker]:
Even the anti-death penalty people turn into cowards with these cases. They don’t protest. Robert Bowers’ lawyer offered a plea for life in prison, but the Biden administration refused, insisting on the death penalty. The Tree of Life synagogue, known for protesting the death penalty, demanded Bowers be put to death.
Jews don’t have a principle; it’s all Talmudic. They don’t care about the four children buried by Savage. That’s not how the American legal system should work. It’s like the Soviet system, where the first anti-terrorism law was developed in the 1920s to prosecute political views. Someone should sue on behalf of Bowers and Roof for viewpoint discrimination. You can’t send someone to the death penalty because of their political views.
[01:14:20] – [Warren]:
This ties back to the end of chapter one. Another myth is that Jews are just after money. They also have a firm moral code, but it’s tribal: protect the tribe at all costs.
The Jewish criminal lives and moves almost exclusively within the circle of his racial comrades, and he can unconditionally count upon their sympathy or at least their silence -- it does not often happen that one Jew denounces another.
From the circumstance of Jewish solidarity with his criminal racial comrades, it should not be inferred that the Jew possesses no 'moral code.' On the contrary -- the Jew has a very firm moral code in his terms -- the moral code of a nomadic tribe with no native soil anywhere, for whom anyone standing outside of his tribe is an enemy; everyone … [within] the tribe, … [must] be protected … [The Jew as Criminal, p20]
They have a very firm moral code, but it’s abominable to us because it’s tribal. The second chapter is about Jews as lawyers.
As wire-pullers and mouthpieces of the criminal and political Underworld, Jewry leads a concentrated attack upon the law and order of the people. The Jewish fence helpfully stands by the Jewish thief, the Jewish psychologist and expert stands by the Jewish sexual offender, and the Jewish attorney stands by both … Jewry got ahold to the furthest extent even of the science, interpretation and execution of criminal law. It moulded and undermined the law in order to render it an impotent tool against Jewish criminality. [The Jew as Criminal, p25]
[01:17:52] – [Striker]:
It’s not just about making money as lawyers; it’s about controlling the law so their tribe doesn’t get in trouble. I was astonished to learn that Magnus Hirschfeld’s Sexual Institute was funded by the Prussian government. Willi Münzenberg and Communist Party deputies were living there.
[01:19:00] – [Warren]:
Their own publications, like the monographs from the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin, Sexus, published by Magnus Hirschfeld, were filled with contributions from Jews like Werthauer, Kronfeld, Juliusberger, Alsberg, Kurt Hiller, and Hirschfeld, pushing for reforms to protect sexual offenders. Hirschfeld saw his mission as proving that criminals are not guilty, based on their personality, motives, and entire metaphysical personality.
[01:21:07] – [Striker]:
When Hitler took power, they raided Hirschfeld’s institute and burned the books. The Gestapo beat Kurt Hiller severely. In America, people who lure and beat pedophiles are targeted by the media, especially when they target gay pedophiles. Jews get flashbacks when parents object to sexual books in schools, saying, “That’s what the Nazis did.”
[01:25:41] – [Warren]:
There’s a section about Jews and pedophilia. Some of the faces in the book, like the Soviets, look like physical monsters. There’s an interesting point about Trotsky and Stalin. Even though Stalin was surrounded by Jews, and the Soviet state was run by Jews during World War II. What’s interesting is the theory they put forward here about the struggle for power with Trotsky and others in 1936. It says,
It likewise was a matter of a well-known Jewish 'family quarrel,' the struggle for power between two Jewish cliques in the Bolshevist apparatus, a power-struggle which lasted nearly two decades and only came to an end with the 'liquidation' of the Sinovyev group. In the dock sat the Westernized coffeehouse and asphalt-Jews, who in Europe are to be found at the head of the Marxist and liberal parties, to which Trotsky-Bronstein also belonged intellectually, and from which strong threads of sympathy and perhaps also political connections ran to the so-called Trotskyite-Sinovyevists in the Soviet Union. The judgement was passed and executed by the more brutal, filthier, but also more powerful ghetto Jews, like the then head of the GPU, Yagoda (whose correct name was Yehuda), Bärmann, and the great number of hangers-on, the GPU-Jews and the Jewish clique around Stalin, which grouped itself about the person of Lazar Mosessohn Kaganovitch. [The Jew as Criminal, p33]
The trial offered a nausea-producing picture of Jewish intrigue, cowardice, and dishonesty. I thought it was an interesting distinction—the westernized coffeehouse and asphalt Jews versus the more brutal Ghetto Jews around Stalin.
[01:28:32] – [Striker]:
Stalin emerged by biding his time until the ’30s, then asserting himself. Think of it like someone seizing the Holy Grail out of nowhere. The Jews didn’t see him coming, and some decided, “We can’t just let the Soviet Union go to this Georgian peasant; we have to be in on this.”
They made peace with it, like the inverse of Roy Cohn executing the Rosenbergs. In this period, you have a fight between the westernized, pro-American Jews like Trotsky, closely linked to Jewish American finance, and Stalin saying, “No, you need to be all in on the Soviet Union and global communism.” Some Jews made a deal with Stalin, and instead of just the Rosenbergs, half the Bolshevik Jews were killed. World Jewry decided to side with the Soviet Union, offering up Trotsky, Zinoviev, and others as proof to Stalin.
[01:30:06] – [Warren]:
Somebody in the chat said, “Tunnel Jews versus optics Jews, it’s eternal.” The ones who took power after Stalin were some of the most brutal Jews ever. In World War II, the Nazis didn’t treat them well when they found them. The idea that Trotsky, Yagoda, and Zinoviev were doves is total bullshit. They were more brutal than the Stalin faction, ruling in the ’20s with the worst kind of terror.
[01:30:56] – [Striker]:
They used to take Orthodox Christian nuns and throw them in tar pits, doing the most horrific stuff. Don’t fall for the meme created in the West as a cudgel against the Soviet Union—Trotsky even designated himself Field Marshal.
[01:31:38] – [Warren]:
Did you get some sense of parallels to modern-day Antifa when they talk about the criminal haunts in Berlin and Germany?
[01:31:50] – [Striker]:
They mention Antifa in there.
[01:32:02] – [Warren]:
These criminal districts of the large cities were simultaneously the incubation nests of communism. Among the pimps, whores, fences, and thieves, the agents of Moscow felt at home. Here, the operations of the illegal Communist organizations were hatched out. Here, the criminals were recruited and paid for what they had carried out. The underworld furnishes the recruits of Communism. The Kaschemme is the nursery of criminal Bolshevism, just as the cafe is of salon Bolshevism.
[01:32:54] – [Striker]:
Look at how the left is obsessed with sex workers—whores and pimps. They say “sex work is work,” something communists and anarchists claim, but it’s the most capitalist statement ever. In my experience studying these people, there’s tons of overlap between Antifa, communists, anarchists, and criminals. After World War II, the Soviets got rid of this element, so you don’t associate it with the suit-and-tie types like Walter Ulbricht.
But the early revolutionaries in the ’20s and ’30s in Western Europe, America, Russia, and Eastern Europe were just thugs, criminals, pimps, whores, and mobsters with tons of overlap with the Communist movement. They’ve recreated the Weimar Republic in places like Portland, where Andy Ngo reports on famous A342eewswqxntifa members getting arrested for armed robbery—not even stealing for the cause, but for personal wealth.
[01:35:18] – [Striker]:
On a purely objective level, it makes sense. To fund a revolutionary organization, you need a lot of money fast without working, so engaging with the criminal underworld is the way to do it. With the Jews, the Bolsheviks and the pimps and whores are the same people.
[01:35:50] – [Warren]:
My old man told me about Horst Wessel when I was young, how he wrote the Horst Wessel Lied. I thought it was a beautiful song, especially in Triumph of the Will. He was a young artist and musician murdered by communists at 23, part of the Wandervogel movement—almost a Nazi hippie thing, playing guitar by a campfire.
[01:37:25] – [Striker]:
Albrecht Höhler, who murdered him, looks just like a Portland anarchist—covered in tattoos from a time when only criminals got them.
[01:37:57] – [Warren]:
They celebrate this underworld murderer who slaughtered a young artist. In the movie Hans Westmar, Goebbels didn’t like it because the actor was wooden, but it gets right the scenes of communists in Berlin as seedy underworld figures.
[01:39:01] – [Striker]:
Kreuzberg in Berlin today is an Antifa hub full of anarchists, Turkish immigrants, Blacks, scum, criminals, and rich kids pretending to be criminals.
[01:41:04] – [Warren]:
The cowardly and underhanded murder of Horst Wessel carried out by a member of the underworld, communist and pimp Ali Höhler on the 14th of January 1930, instigated and planned by Sally Epstein and Elsa Cohn, furnished for all time the irrefutable proof of the identity of Bolshevism, Jewry, and crime.
[01:41:48] – [Striker]:
“The members of the Ringverein were in Berlin, and are today in all large cities, identical to the members of the communist terror groups of the Rotfrontkämpferbund.”
The original says Antifa—how could anyone say we have nothing to learn from the Nazis? It’s eerily familiar.
[01:48:23] – [Striker]:
There’s also stuff in that book on how Chaim Weizmann, one of the biggest Zionists and an advisor to President Roosevelt, organized with the New York prosecutor, the mayor, and the feds—whatever passed for feds at the time. They were all working with Meyer Lansky and the gangsters to attack the pro-German event. The feds and cops would feed information about where their meetings were, then these Jewish mobsters would show up and beat the shit out of them. If the Germans or white Americans fought back, they would get arrested. Does that sound familiar? It’s exactly how it happens now.
[01:48:55] – [Warren]:
They use both because it’s the perfect setup. The one thing that holds it all together is the Jews themselves. If you put the target on that group, that identity, that people, then this whole thing breaks apart. But if you’re fighting the left, the courts, the media, the criminals, or Antifa, it’s a different story.
ASIDE - DISCUSSION OF CHARLOTTESVILLE ENCOUNTER WITH ANTIFA
[02:00:33] – [Warren]:
Back to the book—Jews and criminal haunts give them an advantage with their network. The so-called French Resistance was the same. They bragged that a lot of it was the criminal underworld. This was the line I wanted to get to on this page—I thought it was the key thing. It reminded me of Fagin and Sikes. Sikes is the big aggressive psychopath who gets mad and kills his wife because he thinks she betrayed him in a rage. Meanwhile, Fagin is the hunched, cowardly figure behind the scenes. They just say it:
Although the Jew generally does not commit theft or burglary by his own hands, since he usually shrinks from the physical danger and only reluctantly reaches for the chlamydnis [sic], he is quite active in fencing out of preference. Theft and burglary are not lucrative enough for him, but their appraisal definitely is. The Jew carries on crime as a business and business, at least in principle, as crime. Both are, for him, merely different forms of his struggle for power and existence against the others, the Goyim. All wholesome transactions of the merchant take on in the hands of the Jew a distorted and criminal shape. Credit is transformed into usury, fair purchasing into receiving stolen goods, exploitation of favorable opportunities into fraud.
[02:01:42] – [Striker]:
That’s pretty accurate. At this point in America, they don’t even need to be doing this anymore. They have the theft and burglary of BlackRock, but what’s funny is they’re still doing it. They make a point of saying a lot of this is Eastern European Jews—illegal immigrants from Poland, Belarus, Lithuania, and Russia, coming into Germany in the ’20s to operate these criminal enterprises and spread Bolshevism. It’s amazing.
[02:02:25] – [Warren]:
The pickpocket thing too—that’s the main thing with Fagin. He has this gang of child pickpockets. There’s a scene in that wonderful David Lean film, and I’m sure it’s in the book, where he’s teaching little Oliver, who’s a very innocent kid. He’s showing him, “Oh, you clever boy. There’s my handkerchief sticking out of my pocket. See if you can take it without revealing it.” Oliver tries, pulls it out, and Fagin says, “Clever boy. He has a shilling for you.”
[02:03:06] – [Striker]:
I’ve found modern-day Fagins in my research. Look at the part with the fencing and theft. Open the link I sent you—this is very recent.
[02:03:35] – [Warren]:
New York Attorney General, NYPD bust massive retail theft operation confiscating over $3.8 million in stolen goods. The owner of a pawn shop, Rony Rubinov, 42, would pay people to steal merchandise from retail stores like Fluegas [sic] and then have them bring it to the shop where they’d receive cash.
[02:04:07] – [Striker]:
Rony Rubinov operated a pawn shop in the Diamond District. I sent you another link about the Chilean gang. The Trump people mention they’re Chilean, but they’re just the instrument.
[02:04:35] – [Warren]:
Two men charged in a burglary operation, including one reportedly of an NFL star’s home—running a fencing operation.
[02:04:43] – [Striker]:
The Diamond District is the big thing. Dmitri Nazitski and Juan Vilar. Juan Vilar is the middle guy between the criminals and the Jew. Millions of dollars in shoplifting and burglary money.
[02:05:03] – [Warren]:
In Oliver Twist, what makes it really despicable is they’re children. Fagin threatens them, enticing them by seeming lovable, which is how the character was later portrayed in the musical Oliver! He’s charming, like they write about the Jew being a funny character. But he turns on a dime and threatens the kid. They pick on children because they can intimidate them. When Charles Dickens wrote about this book, a wealthy Jewish woman said, “I feel like this is really antisemitic. It’s bad for us.” He said, “Madam, I don’t mean it to be, but you have to understand I was in London during that period this book takes place, the 1830s.” Dickens wrote in a letter, “People who were engaged in that business were universally of that background—they were all Jews.”
[02:06:36] – [Striker]:
It’s remarkable, but what’s amazing is they still are. I sent you an article from The New Yorker about this. Ronnie Rubinoff is selling stolen K-Cups, condoms, prom dresses—baby formula too. The people doing it are crackheads—Blacks doing this are crackheads. This is why I resist the urge to blame it just on Blacks. Like the book says,
Without the fence, there is no thief.
The fence is the only reason they can make money from this.
02:07:29] – [Warren]:
Just about any booster hanging around the Diamond District a few years ago knew Roni Rubinov’s pawnshop, New Liberty Loans. Rubinov wasn’t the only fence who would buy stolen goods and resell them online, but he had a reputation for taking pretty much anything a shoplifter could bring him: Rolexes, baby formula, condoms, boxed chocolate, prom dresses, K-cups, Amazon gift cards. He’d even buy food stamps. Once, a booster offered him a box of pens he’d found in a trash can. Rubinov bought it.
Most often, though, boosters sold Rubinov cosmetics pinched from pharmacy chains. On any given day, they would head to Duane Reade or CVS or Rite Aid, sweep an armful of creams — L’Oréal, RoC, No7 — into a pillowcase, and leave. In and out in 60 seconds. Occasionally, some poor sales associate or “loss-prevention specialist” would attempt to scare the culprit, but company policy often prevented their doing much more. Cosmetics in tow, boosters would head to 47th Street near Sixth Avenue, where they were greeted by New Liberty Loans’ soot-stained marquee: WE BUY GOLD & 💎. 2 FLOOR. Up the stairs, past Rubinov’s pawnshop, through a room cluttered with gold testers, money counters, and precision scales, and up a back staircase, they would arrive at Rubinov’s second office, a room he kept for the bounty his legion of thieves brought him. Sometimes there would be a line because boosters came back two or three times a day.
[02:09:43] – [Striker]:
This isn’t from the 1820s or even the 1920s—it’s from the 2020s. The article is hilarious—I was dying reading it today. Organized crime in New York City—every one of these barbershops with Russian Jews cutting your hair also buys gold. They’re all criminal fronts. We’re talking millions of dollars worth of shoplifted goods.
[02:10:52] – [Warren]:
I love how this book doesn’t let anything go. By the end, the last chapter gets into murder, building up from political assassination to the crimes of the Cheka, which were still fresh at the time. It doesn’t start with that—it takes its time. This is not a small thing. There’s an old James Cagney movie called Great Guy where he plays an official with the Department of Weights and Measures. It’s from this era of gangster films, but he’s not a G-man—he’s dealing with shops screwing over people during the Depression. They’d stick a piece of metal in a chicken when they weighed it or use false bottoms on containers. It was a whole thing. I don’t know if the Department of Weights and Measures still exists—it probably does—but you don’t think about working people being chiseled thousands of times with these tiny things.
[02:12:30] – [Striker]:
Go to a store in New York City—it’s dystopian. You’ve got to call an attendant and wait an hour to get a tube of toothpaste because of this. The stores are understaffed—it’s a general nuisance what they’re doing. It’s easy to blame Blacks—they’re the ones stealing it—but why not go after the fences? This is just the tip of the iceberg.
[02:13:03] – [Warren]:
It’s a constant activity of undermining honest trade, screwing over working people—corrosive. The company that finds little ways to cheat at taxes, weights and measures, or get stolen goods and sell them prospers. When I worked for that Jew in Plainview, I remember when we got the iPhone in. Verizon didn’t have it before, and suddenly they did. He told us, “Talk people out of it—push them into an Android phone.” The iPhone was expensive with a low margin from Apple and Verizon. Some off-brand Android phones had a crazy profit margin. We’d make more too as salesmen—he was cutting us in. My percentage would go up based on selling a single phone—it was the only sales job like that I ever had. The businessman who prospers with these dishonest tricks grows bigger, expands, and buys out his competition. The honest person can’t compete with the cheat and goes under. I thought of that big time when they talked about bankruptcy in the first chapter. Later, they explain how Jews are big on bankruptcies. Trump brags about how he used bankruptcies as a normal business tool. For most Germans, bankruptcy is a terrible, embarrassing disaster, but for Jews, it’s a way of moving money around.
[02:16:26] – [Striker]:
That’s what happened with the Bronfman family—they owned the Seagram’s company. I sent you their Wikipedia page. They made all their money in Prohibition smuggling hooch, and the guy who did it became president of the Canadian Jewish Congress.
[02:17:13] – [Warren]:
Edgar Bronfman—I first heard that name reading Who Rules America?. It clicked with me about Jewish power—fucking gangsters. He becomes head of the World Jewish Congress.
[02:17:29] – [Striker]:
The New York Times staff reporter Nathaniel Popper said the Bronfman family is perhaps the single largest force in the Jewish charitable world—all from smuggling during Prohibition. Hard liquor like whiskey and scotch is an Aryan art, but the Jew makes the $5 cheap version. There’s a chapter in The International Jew by Henry Ford about Eli’s Nigger Gin—fortified bathtub gin causing the crime rate to explode in the Black community.
[02:18:43] – [Warren]:
Chapter four deals with imposters—what they mean is con artists or scammers. They describe this guy Ignaz Träger, and I thought, “They gotta be making this up—Julius Streicher got ahold of the pen and started an antisemitic fantasy.” Then I looked him up.
[02:19:17] – [Striker]:
Think of Catch Me If You Can or The Talented Mr. Ripley—con artists. That’s what they mean by imposters.
[02:20:01] – [Warren]:
Ignatius Timothy Trebitsch-Lincoln … was a Hungarian-born adventurer and convicted con artist … of Jewish descent. … [H]e posed as a Protestant missionary, Anglican priest, British Member of Parliament for Darlington, German right-wing politician and spy, Nazi collaborator, Buddhist abbot in China, and self-proclaimed Dalai Lama.
What did you think when you were reading this guy’s story? I was like, “This can’t be real.” Talking about how he goes to England and becomes an actual minister for three years. Then he waits for the time when somebody leaves a lot of money to the church, and he takes off. It was an incredible story. We don’t have time to go through the whole thing, but you guys can read it—it’s insane. They make the point that:
It is now easy to understand why so many Jews are to be found among imposters. Their intellectual versatility, adaptability, their inborn aptitude for the art of pretense, their talent for imitation and copying, not least their unscrupulousness, dishonesty, and the lack of a sense of right—all these characteristics which they have in common with imposters. When a Jew appears today as a Russian, tomorrow as a Pole, then a Swede, then a Spaniard, then a German, this is a political imposture which all Jewry has developed over centuries into a high arc of public exception.
[02:22:34] – [Striker]:
Think of the movie Barry Lyndon. We were talking about that, right? That’s like a Jew pouring himself into this archetype, this character.
[02:22:43] – [Warren]:
You’re right. Maybe that’s why it rubbed me the wrong way—everything feels kind of Jewish about it, even though it’s not explicit.
[02:22:55] – [Striker]:
It’s an imposter. Barry Lyndon is an imposter who’s doing it to finance his ego. That’s actually more innocent—Gentiles do that too. I think Barry Lyndon was even a real person. With Jews, they do it to finance their race. It’s not just an individual trying to get rich—it’s not that simple.
[02:23:17] – [Warren]:
The key line here is:
The Jew plays roles and deceives on principle, professionally as a rule, not as an exception. That is the most important weapon of his existence and in his struggle for power.
[02:23:37] – [Striker]:
They have a high imposter quotient.
[02:23:52] – [Warren]:
I was thinking about Ryan Grim—brilliant, courageous, a smart guy who takes risks. His career has been under attack—a guy I respect. But then you have Steve Witkoff, an anti-Netanyahu diplomat, Jeffrey Goldberg, a journalist, and Max Blumenthal, an anti-Zionist. This critical part of the picture—you’re missing it. The point they’re making here is it doesn’t just apply to the comical scam artist they describe. They go through several of them—that one is an extreme case. But the point they’re building to is that Jews are always playing a role.
[02:24:50] – [Striker]:
Think of how Andrew Sullivan got in with these heterodox Jews. He’s a gay conservative who fashions himself a free thinker. He gets in with Bari Weiss, who says, “I believe in free thinking too. That’s why I’m leaving the left—I’m not a liberal anymore because they don’t allow free speech.” Then they’re out there frothing at the mouth, talking about arresting people and deporting them for criticizing Israel—legal residents. This goy is astonished by it—he’s literally shocked and mentioned it. He’s like, “I can’t in good conscience stick with this crowd—they don’t believe what they’re talking about.” No shit, they don’t—they’re imposters. No Jew believes in free speech.
[02:25:44] – [Warren]:
I haven’t heard of Andrew Sullivan in years. I remember seeing him on talk shows—I haven’t heard that guy’s name lately.
[02:25:54] – [Striker]:
He’s pro-Israel—always has been—but he’s turning on them over this.
[02:26:13] – [Warren]:
It’s so simple to understand. I had a bell curve in mind when reading this book. Grug-level antisemitism—you see a lot of that now on Telegram and in comment sections. It has a function—it’s valuable on Twitter right now where people are just dumping when they see this Jewish bullshit. But it’s easily outmaneuvered and outwitted. Then you have this really high, knowledgeable, wise awareness of the Jews, opposing them on all levels for the right reasons. The mid-wit position in the middle is, “Why all this focus on the Jews?” Or the leftists who have it right in front of them but won’t make the link. Your point is always that they’re either bought off, don’t believe, or they’re afraid—and that’s a lot of it.
[02:27:09] – [Striker]:
Look at Ricky Vaughn or Douglas Mackay, Matt Forney, or Parrott. They know what the Jews are about—they’re just pussies, opportunists, or trying to save themselves.
[02:27:33] – [Warren]:
He finally goes into Maxim Litvinov, and that’s where this chapter gets really interesting—from curiosity to something more.
[02:27:35] – [Striker]:
He gets the Ekhrana documents describing Litvinov before the Bolshevik Revolution as a very wealthy Russian. One of the top Bolsheviks is part of an elite banking family. People try to make tenuous links between Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution—there’s evidence for it. But there’s also evidence of the Litvinov family—their son is a Bolshevik leader.
[02:28:28] – [Warren]:
Whenever I think of a leader of a worker’s revolution—the two-fisted factory worker peasant revolution—this is what I think of. It was fascinating reading about this individual. A very powerful guy—pushed out by Molotov at one point. What was funny, in reading about him, was that so many powerful Jews around Stalin, when they got pushed out, Stalin would still stay on good terms with them—not all, but a lot. They weren’t liquidated like so many ethnic Russian leaders were. He was gently pushed aside, then brought back.
[02:29:15] – [Striker]:
Stalin pushed Litvinov aside to buy time in negotiations with Nazis because they wouldn’t sit at a table with a Jewish diplomat. Stalin made Hitler think the Soviets were eager to join an anti-Atlanticist alliance. The Nazis were convinced he was genuine—so even they fell for it.
[02:29:32] – [Warren]:
He was really gung-ho about forming an anti-Nazi alliance, for obvious reasons.
[02:29:40] – [Striker]:
He met with Roosevelt—it says there.
[02:29:43] – [Warren]:
He was instrumental in winning long-sought formal diplomatic recognition of the Soviet government by the United States. President Franklin Roosevelt sent Harpo Marx to the Soviet Union as a goodwill ambassador—that’s nuts. Litvinov and Marx became friends and performed a routine on stage together. He also facilitated the Soviet Union’s acceptance into the League of Nations, representing his country from ’34 to ’38, and negotiated the Franco-Soviet Treaty of Mutual Assistance.
[02:31:13] – [Striker]:
That’s for people who say the Nazis started the war. France had a Jewish prime minister when they signed that.
[02:31:32] – [Warren]:
He publicly endorsed the purges and negotiations regarding Germany. German state media, after the 1938 Munich Agreement, derided Litvinov for his Jewish ancestry, calling him Finkelstein-Litvinov.
[02:31:42] – [Striker]:
That’s his actual name—how is that deriding him?
[02:31:48] – [Warren]:
In this book, they’re sticklers about using real names. Whenever they mention Trotsky, it’s “Bronstein.” Ayn Rand—I always say “Alisa Rosenbaum.”
[02:32:02] – [Striker]:
Think of it in the context of the imposter. I’m proud of my surname—why aren’t they? They’re always running an angle, a confidence scam. “I’m not Finkelstein, I’m Litvinov. I’m not Bronstein, I’m Trotsky.”
[02:32:28] – [Warren]:
There’s a section in the book where he talks about how they change their names—not just a few, but they all do it regularly. Stalin still had faith in Litvinov—no concrete proposals for a Nazi-Soviet pact had been made, so they’re moving to encircle Germany under Litvinov. This is pure Jewish hatred. He’s cozying up to Winston Churchill and the French ambassador Naghiar—I don’t think he was Jewish. He was replaced in May. At a prearranged meeting, Stalin said the Soviet government intended to improve relations with Hitler and possibly sign a pact with Nazi Germany. As a Jew and an avowed opponent of such a policy, Litvinov stood in the way. Litvinov argued and banged on the table. Stalin demanded he sign a letter of resignation.
[02:34:11] – [Striker]:
You can see guys like Stalin trying to prevent this war, but the Jews push them toward it anyway. Neville Chamberlain, Joseph Stalin—all these figures trying to do the right thing, but the Jewish lobbies in their countries triumph.
[02:34:35] – [Warren]:
Who was around Roosevelt? That’s truly crazy. There’s that famous two-minute clip of Goebbels talking about the Jews behind the enemy coalition, rattling off names. It’s one of those early alt-right edits showing all the Jews around FDR—the Brain Trust could’ve been called the Jew Trust. The fates of millions are at stake, and they’re working out this international conspiracy.
[02:35:17] – [Striker]:
Think of it like the 17th century—there’s a hidden power not in the history books, and that power is the Jews. They’re not a nation-state—they’re a power bloc in Britain, America, and the Soviet Union—the war party. Something happened where Stalin lost the debate. He wasn’t the all-powerful figure people make him out to be—he was strong but feared the Jews around him. The meme of him as completely in charge, like Ivan the Terrible, is exaggerated. He was bullied by them to some extent—or buying time with the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact to modernize the Soviet military that couldn’t even beat Finland.
[02:36:32] – [Warren]:
He comes back later. The idea that Litvinov was banging his fist on the table to Stalin—I’ve read another account recently about that brutal Jewish commissar in Crimea. Lev Mekhlis—horrible, scary, evil Jew. I was researching the Nazi leader in Crimea [General Georg Thomas], a really good guy who treated the people there great. He wrote that famous memorandum pushing back against [Erich Koch] who said, “When I meet a Ukrainian as intelligent as me, I have to have him shot.” Mekhlis was a monster—militarily incompetent but had generals shot, blaming them for his failures. During the Great Purge, he was head of the political administration of the Red Army, nicknamed The Shark and The Gloomy Demon. He supervised a drastic purge of at least 20,000 of the 30,000 political commissars attached to the army. According to Khrushchev, he had a strong influence over Stalin.
I had been on good terms with Mekhlis at one time, but when he was appointed head of the Main Political Directorate... I came to regard him as a fool. I was amazed that a man like Mekhlis could enjoy Stalin’s unlimited confidence. Mekhlis’s activity did great harm to our army and to the country as a whole. [Khrushchev Remembers (1970), p250]
Needing someone to blame for the disastrous setbacks of the Red Army in ’41, Mekhlis ordered an artillery commander, Goncharov, shot in front of headquarters, encouraged the killing of German POWs, contributing to the Feodosia massacre. He fucked up terribly in Crimea with brutal fear tactics. John Erickson [in The Road to Stalingrad: Stalin’s War with Germany, Vol. 1] wrote,
In May of 1942, Mekhlis threw away 21 divisions of three armies in a nightmare of confusion and mismanagement.
You’d think Stalin would kill this guy for sure. He was removed on his return to Moscow.
Mekhlis, the military illiterate, combined crass incompetence with a tyrannical insistence on his own authority.
He was of irreproachable personal courage, though.
[02:40:21] – [Striker]:
All that stuff where people clap for an hour when Stalin plays the piano—those are based on Leon Trotsky’s memoirs. In reality, Stalin was probably scared shitless of the Jews and suspected they’d kill him if he didn’t do what they said—that’s why he tolerated them. He was kind of the scapegoat for a lot of the atrocities in the Soviet Union.
[02:40:48] – [Warren]:
I watched a documentary on it—total military disaster. This murderous Jew has Russian generals shot for his mistakes.
On his return to Moscow, Mekhlis was removed from the post of Deputy People’s Commissar of Defense and chief of the main political administration of the Red Army. Witnesses claim that when Mekhlis came to Stalin after the defeat, Stalin shouted at him and slammed the door in his face. He was demoted two levels in rank to a corps commander. He soon recovered from his demotion. As of September 6th, 1942, he was a lieutenant general, and in July ’44, he became a colonel general and was made head of the army’s main political directorate. In this position, his influence was contained by resistance from leading military officers like Zhukov. In 1946, he was made minister of government control over the USSR, a position he held until 1950.
If you want to do more research on your own, this is a terrifying character. The idea that the Nazis were fighting Slavs or were anti-Slav—they were fighting Judeo-Bolshevism, and it was devils like this guy, that nobody’s even heard of, largely running the Soviet Union at that time. Litvinov is another one who gets to bang his fist on the table to Stalin and mouth off to him. He gets demoted, but as soon as they go to war—Germany attacks the Soviet Union, which caught even this guy by surprise—he’s right back in their good graces. He didn’t think Hitler would attack when he did.
Litvinov’s replacement with Molotov significantly increased Stalin’s freedom to maneuver in foreign policy. The dismissal of Litvinov, whose Jewish background was viewed unfavorably by Nazi Germany, removed an obstacle to negotiations with Germany. Stalin immediately directed Molotov to purge the Ministry of Jews. Recalling Stalin’s order, Molotov commented, Thank God for these words.
Jews formed an absolute majority in the leadership and among the ambassadors. It wasn’t good.
[02:43:38] – [Striker]:
Stalin had a healthy fear of these people. He was afraid of them because they all got back in as soon as it started. It reminds me of Trump, where everyone acts like he’s this gangster, this godfather that everyone fears. Then you see him pushing the chair in for Netanyahu. I suspect Stalin wasn’t as weak as Trump, but it was closer to that than the Hollywood Death of Stalin satire of a dictator. With Trump, people act like he’s this gangster who says, “I’m gonna remember what you did to me.” Funny, he doesn’t remember how the ADL tried to ruin his presidency or how elite Jews funded his opponents that he’s working with now. I suspect Trump and Stalin are very similar.
[02:45:11] – [Warren]:
The line I really liked was this:
As fence, weapons broker, and swindler, Finkelstein,
-Litvinov,-
began his career, which after the victory of Bolshevism bore him up to the dizzying heights of a political imposture of the greatest style. In German, there’s a play on words—Schwindel means both to make dizzy and to swindle. Today, as of 1937, he plays the roles of foreign minister and member of the Geneva Council with the same virtuosity as he earlier played the roles of an officer of Ecuador, a leader of the workers, and a ‘socialist.’ Genuine in him is only his Jewishness, which drives him from deceit to crime, and from crime back again to deceit. The base and cunning role he has really played will perhaps sometime later come into the full light of day, or is Maxime supposed to not know what Meyer does? The dead will one day rise up and testify against Finkelstein. This Jewish imposter in the realm of politics by no means stands out like he ever did in American politics.
[02:46:34] – [Striker]:
Think of the pickle Donald Trump is in—no one trusts his ambassadors because they’re all Jews. He has to find very goyish people like Marco Rubio or Pete Hegseth to represent America, rather than Anthony Blinken or those types. The problem of America is that the world is increasingly aware of what these Jews are about. That makes it hard for the Communist Soviet Union or capitalist America to operate in diplomacy, because it requires pulling the wool over your eyes. If you know what they’re doing, Stalin has to take risks, pull this guy off, and put in Molotov. That’s exactly what you see with Trump now.
[02:47:36] – [Warren]:
Here’s that joke:
The same is true of the great revolutionary Bronstein-Trotsky, who was even able to play the role of a bold war commissar of the Red Army for a time, and indeed so aptly that even today many unsuspecting Europeans are convinced he understands something of courage and the art of war. Bronstein as field marshal, truly a zenith of Jewish misrepresentation and imposture.
Then they talk about the name changes they go through. Béla Kun was Adon Khan. Kurt Eisner’s name was Solomon Rzhemchiovsky. Mordechai was Karl Marx. Wolfson was Lasalle.
The Jew has no being of his own, no name, no language. Therefore, he does not cheat when he cheats, for deception is his natural and normal behavior.
Every now and then, the book makes a statement like,
He is the embodiment of the lie and the unnatural.
A little polemical, but I like it—it’s my thing.
[02:49:06] – [Striker]:
Julius Streicher is the editor—he probably muffled that in.
[02:49:20] – [Warren]:
That bit in Triumph of the Will, by the way—he gave a normal speech like the rest of them. They screwed up the film or his footage got messed up, so they had to shoot his separately. He’s the only one recorded apart, saying,
A race that does not maintain its purity goes to ruin.
That thing of them always playing a role applies to literally every Jew in American politics. If you’re not Itamar Ben-Gvir of the Jewish Power Party in Israel, you’re not being honest. That’s the only honesty from Ben-Gvir.
[02:50:40] – [Striker]:
The only honest Jewish politicians in the world are Itamar Ben-Gvir and Smotrich. Even Benjamin Netanyahu is dishonest sometimes when he pretends to be a normal person.
[02:51:01] – [Warren]:
They’re too inbred—they’ve lost their ability to camouflage. That’s why they’re in the Jewish Power Party—the genetic defects are so far gone.
[02:51:20] – [Striker]:
People like Bernie Sanders, Steve Witkoff, and Chuck Schumer are all just putting on an act.
[02:51:24] – [Warren]:
Chuck Schumer’s a good example because he’s so Jewish, but he was famous for leading the dissent against Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran. How is that guy not just a Zionist activist? The next chapter is swindlers and racketeers. There was a funny description of the Eastern Jews that made me think of New York. We have Jews here in West Virginia—they clean up wherever they go, taking over the arts or whatever it may be.
[02:52:38] – [Striker]:
The ones in New York are Ronnie Rubinoff—“Sell me your condoms. I’ll give you 50 cents on the dollar for the condoms.”
[02:52:58] – [Warren]:
The worst thing for them would be if they were all forced to live in the same place. It says:
As tightly packed as ants in their hill are the Eastern European Jews in their ghettos. There are only a few craftsmen among them—nearly all are dealers. The most improbable professions are seen there, such as the Jew who roves around the marketplace with a corkscrew to uncork the vodka bottles for the peasants with it. So numerous are the Eastern Jews that they get in one another’s way.
This made me think of when I sent you that chart about American GDP. This explains why we’re doing tariffs right now—the American economy has few craftsmen left; nearly all are dealers.
[02:54:10] – [Striker]:
To be fair, in theory, what Trump is doing is correct. I saw someone comparing Russia with Spain and Portugal’s GDPs—“Oh, they have the same GDP.” Yeah, but 40% of Spain’s GDP comes from boomers speculating or holding onto inflated real estate. Franco gave boomers free houses now worth millions because they’re in the center of Barcelona. The Spanish economy is doing that, while the Russian economy is building spaceships, satellites, and has an advanced aeronautics industry. On paper, the GDP is the same, but one is fake wealth, and the other is real wealth producing tangible things. Trump’s point is simple—at some point, someone’s going to call out that our wealth is fake, and the dollar’s going to be dumped.
[02:55:39] – [Warren]:
I looked at what Trump’s doing—he’s imposing sanctions on America to build up American industry, like America did to Russia three years ago. There’s no way to do this without pain. I’ve been reading The Economist and neoliberal free trade publications—they don’t get it. There’s no way to avoid the pain.
[02:56:16] – [Striker]:
Some say, “This is Trump falling for working people.” No—he said, “We’re gonna bring manufacturing back, then bring in a bunch of immigrants to work there.”
[02:56:31] – [Warren]:
Today, he put up $5 million—cheaply trying to get money for the empire, to hold shit together. His advisors know about this.
[02:57:11] – [Striker]:
There’s no shame here—it’s illegal to use your position as president to peddle junk like this gold card for citizenship. I have a theory—we’ll forget he ever announced tariffs by next week. It’s an antic, but we can talk about that later.
[02:58:07] – [Warren]:
The fact that they’re doing this shows they mean business—they’re desperate.
So numerous are the Eastern Jews that they get in one another’s way. To do business among themselves means little profit, for each one knows every wrinkle in the tricks of the other and is just as crafty. If a non-Jew appears from whom money could be made, those striving after profit fall upon him like a swarm of blowflies, with elbows pushing into one another and bickering fiercely over every penny. They vegetate in the ghetto, but in their hearts burns a violent greed for money, which makes them capable of every act and every outrage.
That’s the funny image—these ignoble people filled with hatred. He uses the term “swindling” on page 85—they go through stories of how these swindles work. It’s really good.
[03:00:11] – [Striker]:
It’s their Ponzi schemes—like Sam Bankman-Fried stuff. This is from almost 100 years ago—how could you say it isn’t relevant? How does someone in 1937 know what Sam Bankman-Fried is up to? They’re onto something.
[03:00:40] – [Warren]:
The midwit says, “This is no longer relevant in the modern day.” The poorly educated, truly low IQ say, “Jews are God’s chosen people, victims of the Holocaust, Israel is our greatest ally,” then flip to, “Jews are evil, the devil, behind everything—Elon Musk is a Jew.” As a fan of the poorly educated, I can live with that. You’re a stickler for facts, but the midwit rationalizes, “I’ve thought about it, and this isn’t relevant.”
[03:01:31] – [Striker]:
Midwits are smart enough to know fear—stupid people aren’t. That’s why Nick Cannon says, “I don’t think the Jews is the real Jews.” A lot of Black people operate without fear of this. You can’t say it’s because they don’t get punished—Kanye West lost 30% of his net worth for doing this. Midwits understand social cues acutely and keenly, so they rationalize being a pussy and betraying what they’re for. A midwit just follows social cues—that’s all it is. What unites the stupid and the smart is the ability to think for yourself. The stupid person acts reflexively and doesn’t think about consequences, while the smart person analyzes things thoroughly and realizes the truth is worth fighting for. It’s the midwit who’s in between.
[02:59:55] – [Warren]:
There’s a wonderful way of summing it up. They say:
Swindling is the typical Jewish crime. As cautious a scholar and as reserved in his judgments as Sauer expresses himself in the following way on this question: ‘Many swindling specialties are excellently suited for the Jewish race. In addition, there are own abilities and capabilities which likewise favor deceit. A sense of acquisitiveness, the drive towards being active, delight in participating in lively dealings, speaking talents, boastfulness, the power of suggestion, the ability to misrepresent oneself and to lead others astray, slight affection for the truth, the capacity for adaptation, for empathy.’
I thought that was interesting—sensing the emotions.
[03:00:53] – [Striker]:
Not everything is like you feel someone and want to help them.
[03:01:00] – [Warren]:
Not compassion, but sensing the emotions like a hunter can feel the deer as he hunts it. That’s a real sociopath—someone who can read other people’s emotions well, put themselves in their shoes, feel what they’re feeling, but with no conscience.
[03:01:34] – [Striker]:
The ultimate example is the relationship between the midwit narcissistic prince and the Jew in Jud Süß—a classic example. He understands this chubby German peasant who’s a prince by accidental birth, knows his fears and desires before even the prince does.
[03:02:14] – [Warren]:
When I went to leave that Jew on Long Island for a door-to-door job, it was a big deal for me. I had just come to New York from West Virginia—a country boy. He knew that and said, “Warren, you can’t do that job. You’ll get shot.”
[03:02:41] – [Striker]:
He wanted you to stay working for him because you were making him money, so he appealed to your fear of the big city. It’s just so funny.
[03:02:58] – [Warren]:
In my case, I’ve noticed my whole life that Jews try to assume what I’m about, and it’s always an unflattering Guido thing with me. They think I’m into Guido stuff just from looking at me—it has nothing to do with anything. When they see that doesn’t work, they try a couple of other things. At some point, I realize they get quiet.
[03:03:22] – [Striker]:
They’re like, “I can’t read you, and it’s making me scared.”
[03:03:39] – [Warren]:
I’ve had this happen two dozen times or more in my life—social situations where Jews are involved or around, and they gravitate towards me, try to win me over or figure me out.
[03:03:57] – [Striker]:
In my case, it never works. Then they get really weird and quiet.
[03:04:02] – [Warren]:
It’s not simply that they sense an antisemite—it’s a goyim who’s aware of things, a thinking goyim.
[03:04:19] – [Striker]:
The best is when I know more about them than they know about me—not always in a hostile way. I can sense the palpable fear and loathing when they realize it. They throw things out—“This guy must be into Guido stuff.” Okay, he’s not. “He must be into rockabilly stuff.” He’s not. It gets to a point where I’m finishing their sentences, and they’re like, “How did you know that?” In their minds, it’s like The Terminator with the sight saying, “Must kill—this is a goyim we forgot to kill, that we missed.”
[03:05:01] – [Warren]:
They can spot the Katyn Forest crowd—you belong on that list. That’s how they think.
[03:05:09] – [Striker]:
They’re hyper-empathetic—they know when someone’s on the path to finding out about them and are masters of jumping in and derailing them right in the middle.
[03:05:17] – [Warren]:
Max Blumenthal saying, “Hey, Ryan Grim, how you doing, buddy?” That’s exactly what’s going on.
[03:05:27] – [Striker]:
For someone like Ryan Grim from rural Pennsylvania, he’d probably be shocked if I said that to him. He’d say, “That’s crazy—you’re a paranoid lunatic.” Then at some point, he’ll realize there’s a monster under the bed—it’s real, and it’s killing him. Someone made a great point—Forgetfully Dialing says, “Max Blumenthal and Paul Gottfried have the same job.” So true. You can add Chomsky, Stephen Miller, and Bernie Sanders—just go down the list.
[03:06:22] – [Warren]:
The younger ones aren’t as good at this as the older ones—they’re too privileged. Jared Kushner has no ability to do this—he’s like a retard compared to some of the older types. Just so the audience is aware, the book isn’t just these generalities—I’m reading the general statements between lots of specific long stories and examples where they lay it all out. Fraud in contracts dealing with trade work services, labor renting, leasing, and loans, swindling with precious gems, the sale of worthless goods, fraud at businesses with securities, stocks, dividends, currency, checks, savings account books, mortgage bonds, pawn tickets. Fraud with bail, foundations, balance sheets, insurance fraud, bookmaking swindles, fraud in employment, apartment rental, marriage, titles, military decorations agencies, fraud in the use of public transport, attending theatrical events and celebrations, hotel fraud, skipping out on restaurant bills, swindles in lodging. Con games, fraud in rarities and antiques, phony officials, commercial or industrial employees, nonsense cures of all kinds, hypnosis, alleged medicines, fortune telling, magic.
[03:08:29] – [Striker]:
Simone Gold selling ivermectin—a lot of people in our own audience fell for that one.
[03:08:57] – [Warren]:
These are some, by no means all, the types of fraud which enjoy special favor with the Jews. That’s tied to document forgery, counterfeiting, card sharping, embezzlement, theft, extortion, abortion, arson, bankruptcy, delict, perjury, slander, and more. If theft was formerly the most widespread crime, in recent years it has become otherwise—fraud is now in first place. Fraud is the most universal Jewish crime, the form of Jewish existence in general, whether in business or politics—it’s the same. Then they say something really scary about the Soviet Union, and I thought about the United States—how it’s becoming this or has become this.
It’s an easy matter to demonstrate the entire ‘political economy’ of the Soviet Union represents nothing other than the systematic looting of a people whose population is 200 million strong. There, the Jew is in possession of a total monopoly—he’s the sole employer, for everything is nationalized, and he owns the state. For the working man in the Soviet Union, there’s no deliverance from the Jew—he’s in possession of the entire capital, movable and immovable.
[03:10:39] – [Striker]:
What people hate about communism isn’t the idea of nationalized industries or the state managing the economy—it’s who’s in the state doing it. That’s the problem.
[03:10:54] – [Warren]:
The Jew dictates wages of the worker, the price of all necessities of life—food, clothing, shelter. All economic and police instruments are at his disposal to complete the enslavement of the people. Wages at a level for bare survival on one hand, fantastically high prices for goods on the other, methods of incitement, standards of coercion—give the Jew the possibility of turning usury and defrauding into legal standards of the state. Political Jewry has perfectly achieved it in the Soviet Union.
[03:11:40] – [Striker]:
In America, they learned from communism in the Soviet Union—if the state does this, Gentiles can take it back. But if it’s in the private sector, like in America with monopoly finance capital managing everything—electing politicians, the FBI, the stock market, BlackRock—then the state has no recourse, and Goyim can’t ever touch you. That’s what they learned was superior in respects to Jew power about Americanism and liberalism.
[03:12:23] – [Warren]:
Since we’re pressed for time, I won’t read it, but there’s a whole section about how they used bankruptcy—really interesting. They describe Ponzi schemes:
The most difficult thing for the swindler is the procurement of the necessary credit which makes possible the purchase of larger lots of goods. When an entire gang is operating dummy firms, so-called Staatsfirmen, are established in different parts of the city or outside it, which naturally have the best references to pacify the most suspicious suppliers and infuse them with trust.
[03:13:00] – [Striker]:
Let’s go to the part on Jewish humor—it’s incredible when you think about how the role of Jerry Seinfeld, Rob Schneider, Sacha Baron Cohen works. I saw Sacha Baron Cohen giving a speech at the ADL about how Western governments need to wage an intelligence war against antisemites and anti-Zionists. I was rubbing my eyes—“Aren’t you Borat?” Don’t you make a living off racist humor? The point they make is that Jewish humor is a cover to lower your guard against them. They want you to not take them seriously—Gentiles are obsessed with being taken seriously, but Jews are the opposite. They want you to laugh at them, think they’re puny and pathetic—they’ll play to it with jokes about small penises, neuroticism, Woody Allen types. The book says don’t be fooled—this sense of humor is a defense mechanism to lower your guard so your neck is wide open for their poison. All the goofy Goyim who were Seinfeld fans suddenly see Jerry Seinfeld breaking character, saying, “Those Palestinians gotta go—all those Gazans are terrorists, and I’m sick of you Goyim.” Americans are stupid children raised on Jewish entertainment. That had an awakening moment for Goyim in the U.S.—seeing their favorite funny men like the guy from Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo saying, “I’m so sick of these Goyim talking about dead Goyim children.” Your childlike Goyim emerges.
[03:16:41] – [Warren]:
I remember that Sacha Baron Cohen speech. There’s Jewish humor that’s pretty harmless—like a book about the Nazis where they threw Jews off a cliff in a concentration camp and called them paratroopers. I thought that was funny, but that’s not truly Jewish humor.
[03:17:06] – [Striker]:
They mean humor about themselves.
[03:17:20] – [Warren]:
This chapter is devastating—it starts with how Jews make themselves a joke and ends with the horrors of the Cheka, mass murderers. The world is getting a second awakening in Gaza.
[03:17:51] – [Striker]:
This stuff Germans talked about was known worldwide because of the Bolsheviks—forgotten after World War II. Now even the goofiest, dumbest Goyim in America are aware of this.
[03:18:13] – [Warren]:
It’s being done by the Jewish state. With the Cheka, it was technically the Soviet Union—same with the Iraq War, one degree of separation. Jews pushed it, but there’s just enough distance.
[03:18:43] – [Striker]:
The South Park movie from 1999 played a huge role in demonizing Saddam Hussein years before the Iraq War—associating him with the devil. Trey Stone, a Jew, used humor to plant the seed that we need to kill Saddam.
[03:19:14] – [Warren]:
They say:
One of the most important weapons of Jewry in the struggle to obscure and camouflage its true nature is the Jewish joke. Jewry officially denies the existence of psychic racial distinctions and wants to see the study of race limited to purely exterior physical traits. Unofficially, whispering behind its hand, it has concluded that Jews have their peculiarities, and the Jewish joke serves as their revelation. Many are awkward, others tasteless—much borrowed from other peoples and reworked. They all have one thing in common—to make the Jew out to be an essentially harmless, if sometimes ridiculous person. Individual features of the Jewish character are derided—clumsy familiarity, impudence, an impertinent nature, eccentric dialectics, greed, cowardliness, bodily uncleanliness, haggling, Talmudic narrow-mindedness. But the Jewish joke never penetrates to the kernel of the Jewish essence. The significance lies in emphasizing minor things to divert from the essential—a tactic employed by Jewry over and over again, fobbing off the basis for discussion onto more favorable ground.
[03:19:37] – [Striker]:
Think of something as culturally prominent as Woody Allen, Jerry Seinfeld, Jackie Mason, all these very famous Jewish comedians. Lorne Michaels, the guy who does SNL, is apparently this bloodthirsty Zionist. He’s really old, and everyone who works with him says he’s a bloodthirsty Zionist. Dave Chappelle had to sneak in his jokes about Jews because he was afraid of Lorne Michaels. Think about that.
[03:20:23] – [Warren]:
The ultimate example for me, and I know I keep coming back to it because it’s so outrageous, is that musical Oliver!. A Jew reworked Oliver Twist to make Fagin into this lovable, harmless character who’s actually a victim of Sykes. It ends with him dancing and singing into the distance. He’s a monster—like the devil in Oliver Twist, like Satan. They made him into this funny, quirky comic relief guy you identify with, while Sykes is the big bad psychopath who ruffles Fagin. It’s incredible chutzpah for a Jew to rewrite Oliver Twist like that.
[03:21:23] – [Striker]:
He’s just Mr. Rogers—he loves the kids, taking care of them, not designed to die for little kids who commit crimes on the street for him.
[03:21:38] – [Warren]:
I’m so fixated on this. I’ll do it on my own time, but I’m going to make a Modern Politics where I cut together scenes from these two films showing the difference.
[03:21:45] – [Striker]:
That is ridiculous. As the guy says, the Jew is not ridiculous but dangerous.
[03:22:04] – [Warren]:
That musical Oliver! versus the actual story—the Jewish criminal who trains little homeless slave boys to become pickpockets and thieves isn’t a funny, quirky Willy Wonka. He’s pure evil with no conscience. When Sykes kills his wife in a rage, he’s tortured by the thought that maybe she didn’t lie, that he just lost his temper. His conscience destroys him. Fagin has no conscience—when the crowd comes for him, he’s saying, “Strike them all dead,” hoping for God to kill all the Englishmen after him. That’s Sarah Silverman.
The image of the Jew propagated in the Jewish joke—a crooked-legged, haggling cadger, peddler, or businessman—has become one of the greatest successes of Jewry. It’s hard not to laugh at many Jewish jokes, but whatever one laughs about, one can neither hate nor fear. Contempt cripples the will to fight—the goal is attained. The Jew appears as a ridiculous creature, and behind his disdained petty crookedness disappears what in Jewry is truly dangerous: the brutal.
[03:23:45] – [Striker]:
That’s why I push back on emphasizing their nose or this or that. When you treat them with contempt and underestimate them because they’re ugly or something, you’re missing the point. It’s not just that they’re ugly with big noses—it’s a front for a truly despicable creature you should respect, not in admiration but as the apex predator of your race. When I see people going too far with Jew jokes—“Look at his funny nose,” “Jews are cheap”—that stuff is counterproductive. Even with Randy Fine, sure, he’s a ridiculous fat ass, and we can laugh, but he doesn’t care what you think. At the end of the day, that man is a despicable, sociopathic murderer who’d love to see the world irradiated—not someone to laugh at.
[03:25:06] – [Warren]:
I remember the Saturday Night Live character Harry Hanukah in “Harry Hanukah Saves Christmas.” Santa can’t do his job, so Harry Hanukah comes in. He comes down the chimney, and the goy kids are excited for toys, but they open socks. He goes, “Eight pair. Can you believe it?” It’s a very Fagin-like character, making fun of all the stuff they’re talking about here with Jews, but it’s missing the point—it’s not funny. What’s funny is how the alt-right, to give the devil his due, like Andrew Anglin, early on with The Daily Stormer—back when you were writing for it—analyzed how humor was used to erode and break down sacred things, holy things, values.
[03:26:23] – [Striker]:
These are master profaners. You make jokes about it—like Jesus boiling in a tub of feces—said with malevolence and aggression, but also with a sense of humor.
[03:26:45] – [Warren]:
The early alt-right had a sense of humor, though it could go too far with the irony stuff. There was a lot of bad to it. That type of ironic humor is good for tearing things down, not building things up—you need sincerity, a post-irony to build something.
[03:27:13] – [Striker]:
That’s why The Daily Stormer has aged so poorly. It had tremendous power to make this seem less frightening—like the Murdock Murdock cartoons, so funny, all alt-right. A lot of these people did a good job in their role, but most weren’t at Charlottesville. Their thing was, “You stupid assholes—as soon as you show the Jews you’re serious, they’ll fight you.” Before that, people thought The Daily Stormer was a big funny joke—practical jokes, Papa Johns is a Nazi. Suddenly, this guy’s under FBI investigation. The point was to lower the system’s guard, like Jews do, but if there’s no punch going their way, there’s no point—the power structure hasn’t changed.
[03:28:51] – [Warren]:
Humor still has a place, especially for people not in our thing who view it as a big, dark, scary thing. If you can make them laugh, as it says here, “Whatever one laughs about, one can neither hate nor fear.” It’s powerful on our side too.
[03:29:09] – [Striker]:
It’s a means to an end. What Jews do is their humor isn’t the end—it’s the means. What the alt-right did was make humor the end—that’s the problem.
[03:29:23] – [Warren]:
There was a whole chapter on gambling—it’s amazing they couldn’t imagine something like sports betting. When you think about the power the internet has unlocked, all the things in this book, Jews have taken this invention that could be the greatest breakthrough in mankind and turned it into legalized online sports betting, spying, driving fake narratives.
[03:30:24] – [Striker]:
One time, a guy from Countercurrents wrote an attack on me. His main critique was that I’m not a funny class clown, that I have no whimsy, that I hate whimsical things. I’m like, “No shit.” The point isn’t to juggle bowling pins on a unicycle—I’m here to change the unicycle.
[03:31:07] – [Warren]:
That’s why I like you—I found a fanatic as insane as myself. Our thing has aged well—we’ve outlived these people because we were at the right place at the right time.
[03:31:19] – [Striker]:
People aren’t laughing about this anymore. There’s nothing funny about babies caught in tank treads, aid workers shot in the back of the head, a Zionist occupation of our government ready to throw us into World War III. People want actual ideas and change now.
[03:31:53] – [Warren]:
Even Donald Trump is funny, but not with ironic humor. He’s funny in a German deadpan way—saying crazy things with a straight face, like Haiti is a shithole. There’s no intuitive connection between being an irony bro and liking Trump—he doesn’t care about social approval. There’s a long section on Rasputin—I haven’t studied the Romanovs closely, but their contention is he was surrounded by Jews, a tool of Jews—not directly, but with a circle of Jews and one Jewish secretary whose memoir is on Amazon. They were pushing Rasputin to get the czar to ease up on Jews through the czarina. It clicked when I read this—like, “Of course.” He was this weird mystic, the Mad Monk, who helped cure the kid of his disease. He looked like a Jew, with a long beard, real dirty—a classic cult guru, filthy, didn’t bathe, had hot women throwing themselves at him, considered a magician and mystic. The book shows these influential Jews around him used him to get an in with the Romanovs for favors and to discredit them—like Elon Musk now, an entry point for Jewry but also used to discredit Trump and flex power over him. The people who killed Rasputin were Russian officers, some anti-Semites who knew what was going on. The book’s worth reading for that. A shout-out to Vladimir Purishkevich—legal advisor in the reactionary, anti-Semitic Association of the Archangel Michael, a famous Jew-hater, one of Rasputin’s murderers. He was involved in the Black Hundreds, a right-wing extremist, ultranationalist, anti-Semitic, anti-Communist. He helped organize the paramilitary Black Hundreds in 1905, always pushed against Jews, joined the White movement, supported Russification, was hostile to Jews as the vanguard of the revolutionary movement, wanted them deported. They call him the first fascist because of his views. It shows the Nazis weren’t anti-Slavic or hated Russia—this idea doesn’t hold up.
[03:38:25] – [Striker]:
The anti-Slavic thing was more a general German thing from Bismarck’s time, going back to Prussian-Austrian tensions. It’s a very complicated history, and certainly the Nazis were far less anti-Slavic than their predecessors.
[03:38:34] – [Warren]:
Yes, the Kaiser saw the battle with Russia as a conflict, and to be fair, so did the Russians. The propaganda on both sides saw it as a battle between Slavdom and Germandom. That’s why the Battle of Tannenberg was named to invoke the 1410 defeat of the Teutonic Knights by the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth—a famous Slavic-German clash from the Middle Ages. In World War I, they consciously drew on that Slav-versus-German theme. In World War II, it was, “We’re fighting Jewish Bolsheviks,” not that same narrative.
[03:39:31] – [Striker]:
They didn’t do it at all. There were some remnants of that feeling among the Junkers—stupid, reactionary Junkers—and some Germans, but they were more the normies who joined, not the actual ideologues. Maybe Rosenberg a little bit, but generally speaking, the Nazis weren’t that way. Rosenberg was pro-Slavic because he was a Baltic German, a Russian. The real anti-Slavic sentiment, if any, was among normie Germans. Oswald Spengler was hostile to Slavs.
[03:40:21] – [Warren]:
The one guy who was really hostile was a Bavarian, an old-school NSDAP guy. The Bavarians didn’t have much contact with Slavs, which is why he had that view. People closest to the borders often had better views. The whole thing was an anti-Jewish crusade—that’s how it was presented, interpreted, and fought by both sides. The next chapter deals with pimps and white slavers—basically sex trafficking. There’s a section describing a sex trafficking ring run through Argentina that sounds exactly like what’s happening today.
[03:41:29] – [Striker]:
It sounds like what the Jews were doing to Ukrainian women. It’s the same people—back then, mostly Polish women, because Argentina was very rich, a hub for bringing them to pimp them out. It’s much like how Eastern European women are pimped out in Western Europe or Israel now.
[03:42:03] – [Warren]:
They talk about procurers—female Jewish pimp procurers—and how they suck these women in. They’ll say, “Marry a guy, move abroad,” and then the guy disappears. Here’s the quote:
Frau M. succeeds in finding two other young women prepared to play the comedy—one 20 years old, the other 16, both of striking beauty. Silberreich and Wallerstein are delighted. They tell the girls of the paradise awaiting them in South America. They’re supposed to be employed as housekeepers in fashionable homes—little work, much free time, a fantastic salary, and then marriage, for both will definitely marry. In Argentina, they’re told there are three times as many men as women, and the men are rolling in wealth. After a few months, they’ll find rich husbands. This is played on peasant girls—people with no sophistication. Only one thing is demanded: complete discretion. The German authorities are bureaucratic and narrow-minded, always making unnecessary difficulties.
[03:43:36] – [Striker]:
I get ads on YouTube sometimes—maybe I’m targeted—“Meet beautiful, feminine Ukrainian women who want to meet you.” I’d bet my life the people running that company are Jews. It’s a scam.
[03:44:00] – [Warren]:
Back then, it was harder to travel overseas—you had to go by ship, especially to another continent. There’s a film noir about this—I sent it to you—called Passport to Shame. It’s about a prostitution ring in England. It shows the process—a French girl is promised a job, money, but once she’s there, she’s cut off, isolated in a country she doesn’t know. They say, “You have to do this,” and if she refuses, she’s threatened. It’s evil how they suck these people in—happened all the time then and now.
[03:45:09] – [Striker]:
I saw Israel, for the first time ever, give Ukrainian refugees a way to stay there. You see who’s getting off the plane—all women between 16 and 40. Come on. William Pierce did a whole thing on this in the early 2000s—how Jews were trafficking Ukrainian and Russian women. Now it’s just Ukrainian women—they don’t do it with Russian women anymore. All the hookers in Western Europe now are Ukrainian, pimped out by Jews, no doubt about it.
[03:45:59] – [Warren]:
They say the modern white slave trade is an enormous organized pandering operation on an international scope. At the top of the pyramid are wholesalers who own villas, have impressive bank accounts, and are society members.
They earn the most, are never caught, and their names seem spotless. Naturally, these are Jews. Think of the guy who owns OnlyFans—just porn in general, on steroids. Here’s one thing I’ll read: Solomon Korn is a member of the Warsaw Society for Mutual Assistance and Lawful Burial—one of countless Jewish charitable and burial societies with numerous members, all Jews from Poland, which even had its own cemetery. In reality, this society served one purpose: to camouflage the true activity of its members—white slavers. The truth is known to every insider, but the legal machinery to justify state intervention is lacking. The scandal is so great, the Polish envoy demands the word ‘Warsaw’ be removed. Meanwhile, the business continues. House searches are instituted—Ocampo, a judge, investigates. He’s long awaited a chance to bring the white slavers to justice. House searches are done, correspondence in Yiddish is confiscated, evidence is produced, and the circle of the guilty grows. 424 arrest warrants are issued. The campaign runs up against almost insuperable difficulties. What can a lone judge accomplish against an organized Jewish gang? Police officials are bribed, witnesses intimidated, important documents vanish inexplicably. Many accused move to unknown addresses, some clever ones have death certificates. Only one-fourth—112—of the accused appear in court. The best advocates, Jews of course, defend them. All proof and evidence is plucked apart. Argentinian laws concerning pimps are full of loopholes, so there’s no question of crimes. Eight defendants receive light punishment; the rest are acquitted.
[03:49:06] – [Striker]:
There are good people—a detective, a judge, a prosecutor—trying to stop these Jews, but they’re always thwarted by higher authorities with transnational networks and bottomless wealth.
[03:49:23] – [Warren]:
That’s why Jews have catastrophic failures—when their network breaks down, like with the Inquisition or Edward I kicking them out of England. It’s not like gypsies moving to the next town—they’re gone for 400 years.
[03:49:57] – [Striker]:
You need morally sound men to institute strict anti-Jewish legislation. They get in trouble when those men find each other and take power—that’s when they’re fucked. We’re trying to train morally sound knights—a National Socialist vanguard. Our job is to overthrow these people by knowing their evil plan and creating a counterplan. Every time Jews win against the morally sound, it’s in a liberal democracy with loopholes, making it hard for good people to organize and achieve power.
[03:51:14] – [Warren]:
The next chapter is Jewish sexual offenders. It says Jews try to normalize depravity—well-documented. They get into Freud.
[03:51:17] – [Striker]:
You should read the part about the pedophiles—there’s one where a Jew opens a boarding school for eight-year-old girls, not 15 or 16—a child brothel, all run by Jews.
[03:51:43] – [Warren]:
About Freud:
Sigmund Freud surprised the world with profoundly probing discoveries. He taught that every boy desires his own mother and wants to kill his father, that fathers threaten to cut off their sons’ members. A dream with a hat box obviously refers to female genitals; every thought, feeling, stirring of the soul is solely sexual. Psychoanalysts put these theories into practice—patients with mental pain are told they’re repressed, and letting go is the remedy. Under the pretext of medical assistance, depravity is released. During discussions, patient and doctor give every triviality a filthy interpretation. One step lower are sex scientists like Hirschfeld.
The Sternberg trial: A conviction only because a fearless, dutiful penal official stood firm. The accused was a banker, son of a baptized Jew and a German woman. Though his Jewish descent was undoubtedly, Jews presented him as a racially pure German. He inherited business sense from his father, blonde hair and blue eyes from his mother—handsome, wealthy, with a German wife, a seemingly perfect husband. His businesses thrived—started as a bank employee, became a banker with shares in mining, ironworks, built a railroad. In 1893, his wealth was at least 18 million marks—a huge sum then, compared to a Vanderbilt.
At 48, successful and harmonious, on January 26, 1900, Sternberg is arrested for crimes against an underage girl. He had an irrepressible attraction to small children. Once single, he took a 17-year-old housekeeper—a beauty—but soon she was too old, already a woman, not an undeveloped girl. He planned for her to open a boarding school for little girls, saying, ‘I would like an eight-year-old woman. Women 16 years old are disgusting to me.’ When she refused, she was thrown out. In Berlin, Helene Fischer, proprietress of a massage salon with obscene massages, specialized in small girls. Schoolgirls went in and out, earning money—a stock exchange of vice and child molestation. In the arcade, Berlin’s prostitute meeting place, Fischer’s name was known. She’d pick up the most childlike-appearing girls off the streets, advertised ‘Models with juvenile looks sought by painter.’ Sternberg was her client.
[03:56:06] – [Striker]:
It sounds just like Epstein—13-year-old girls. They blame the victims—“Those stupid chicks wanted the money”—when she’s 12.
[03:56:46] – [Warren]:
He’s a sadist—beating girls, taking baths in front of them, posing as a painter, doctor, educator, giving them examinations, always for sexual abuse. In six months, the court certified at least 30 victims.
How many girls did he point to depravity for life? His Jewish defense counsel got him off before, but now he’s sentenced to two years. He appeals—the Reichsgericht nullifies it, and he’s tried again. His defense, genuinely Jewish, relies on connections and money—reminded me of Leo Frank. He bribes people, pulls strings. Detective Director Schultze assists by silencing inconvenient witnesses. The most dangerous is Constable Steirer-Stadtler, zealous and conscientious. They try to bribe him—invite him to a birthday celebration, meet in expensive restaurants, eating partridges and drinking champagne. Thiel offers him 70,000 marks and a villa on Lake Geneva to cover up this Jew child molester. When that fails, the police director suggests he drop the case, threatening an unfavorable discharge certificate if he resigns.
[04:00:28] – [Striker]:
This is exactly how law enforcement works in America—a perfect parallel. The only difference is there are fewer good, honest, morally sound men willing to fight back here. It’s sad but true.
[04:00:43] – [Warren]:
It keeps going. The guy doesn’t want to change his testimony—he has his oath, his military service. Director Schultze, the corrupt piece of shit, has mobilized an entire workforce, almost all Jews. Witnesses receive payments to testify and go on trips. Others are intimidated, especially the girls Sternberg once molested.
A gentleman in a top hat with curled, dark mustaches
—sounds like Snidely Whiplash—
whispers to one of the witnesses as he walks by, ‘Watch out. It’s your life that’s at stake.’ Another is invited for a glass of beer by an ordinary-looking fellow who rehearses her testimony with her. If she testifies differently, he drops his comfortable manner, looks like a dangerous predator, and says she can expect a perjury charge. The girl doesn’t know what that means, but it terrifies her.
[04:01:46] – [Striker]:
If you read about Victoria Giuffre and others who exposed Epstein, this is exactly what they went through—all of it. Look at the people accusing Weinstein too. Read Ronan Farrow’s articles—they had people telling him, “You better shut up,” or “I’m just trying to be your friend here.” It’s the same shit. Jews are criminals.
[04:02:22] – [Warren]:
After all this, Fisher—they don’t confirm she’s Jewish in court reports, but this is 1937, Nazi Germany, Julius Streicher wrote the foreword. They don’t fudge it.
To judge by her business acumen, she certainly was. Not, ‘The Jew, Fisher,’ but ‘It seems she was a Jew, the procurer.’ The trial comes. Sternberg is calm, witnesses prepared, with six attorneys—the flower of Jewish advocacy. The defense thesis got me: Sternberg has enemies who bribed an unscrupulous officer, Steirer-Stattler—the one honest cop fighting this system, a Serpico. They claim he’s taking bribes, intimidating witnesses, with a mysterious smile suggesting sham charges based on antisemitism. It’s a tried-and-true Jewish trick—shift the discussion to a more suitable plane, turn facts upside down. No enlightened, upstanding person would support this, they say. Freda Voyde, a key witness and victim, appears. Orphaned early, she went to her aunt’s, then via a classified ad to Fisher’s business. Small, almost 12, pretty, eyes full of innocence—the right prey for Sternberg, who molested her several times. First trial, she answers candidly, shyly, looking the judge in the eye, voice clear. Between trials, she’s worked on—eyes sunken, voice barely audible, under terrible fear. She recants everything, says Sternberg did nothing, she lied before.
[04:05:09] – [Striker]:
Their playbook isn’t hard to decipher—it’s the same one they use now. Remarkable how little they’ve evolved.
[04:05:17] – [Warren]:
Everywhere, the evil Steirer-Stadtler, the pig-headed antisemite who organized this against a respectable Jewish banker. The defense triumphs when it’s discovered he once broke his marriage vows. Friends of the child molester point at the adulterer with horror, shouting with glee, “This is supposed to be a servant of the state. One is supposed to believe this man.”
[04:05:51] – [Striker]:
Goofy goyim—you can always count on them to be scandalized. The child molesters say, “This guy banged a chick once.”
[04:05:56] – [Warren]:
The policeman stands confused, neck reddening. He thought he was doing his duty—now he’s the accused. The well-groomed banker lolls at the defense table, arrogantly looking at Steirer-Stadtler, who dared face six lawyers, the Jewish press, and Sternberg’s millions. The Jewish press unleashes a storm—Steirer-Stadtler spoken of with disgust and contempt. Disciplinary proceedings open against the disloyal officer for adultery—a lesson for others. It’s scumbags and traitors protecting the child molester for money, for position—not all Jews, but a lot of them.
[04:06:44] – [Striker]:
You can see how the Nazis were an accumulation of outrages until the dam broke—that’s how Hitler came to power.
[04:06:52] – [Warren]:
I thought the same reading about Russian antisemites. It’s amazing it didn’t happen in Germany sooner—with Spain, England, Italy, Russia, Poland, such a concentration there, erupting in Hitler.
[04:07:16] – [Striker]:
They’re piling on outrages. We’ll probably see something like that in America—every day a new outrage. They’re letting Sam Bankman-Fried out. Everyone knows what Epstein did, who he was, that he’s a Jew working for Mossad, that American elites are in on it. That knowledge doesn’t disappear—it’s too quiet out there. A dam will break—maybe not a white nationalist revolution, but something.
[04:08:10] – [Warren]:
Like the Crown Heights riots, but national.
[04:08:12] – [Striker]:
There are exotic races in America now—Indians, Asians—rising to prominence. They neither love nor hate Jews. Amy Wax says she doesn’t trust them because they don’t love or fear her, just play nice while she has power, not bending over like Anglo goyim. Shame on white nationalists taking that vampire in, defending her when she says, “I need you pathetic goyim to protect me.” Fuck that—let the jackals eat her alive. Do nothing for them.
[04:09:28] – [Warren]:
They say this guy gave to charity, cared for his workers’ welfare, a reliable friend of the working man. Pressure’s applied to his workers—sign a petition in his favor or you’re out. The trial lasts 38 days—German justice tied up with a clear case that should’ve taken days. Dozens of rehearsed witnesses testify, famous experts give opinions, court costs hit 15,000 marks. The press splits into camps. The police director commits suicide. Witnesses are arrested from the bench, police officials face disciplinary proceedings—all due to a Jewish sex criminal. But he can’t buy everyone—not the loyal policeman, not the court. He’s convicted.
[04:10:44] – [Striker]:
Jews are obsessed with goyim believing in institutions—“Respect the process.” With Leo Frank, convicted, then pardoned by a corrupt governor for dirty Jew child-molester money, the righteous lynch mob—Klansmen—kicked down the jail door and brought justice. They freak out when people like Trump discredit institutions. As long as liberal institutions are believed in, they get away with this. Once people see the American judicial system as the fraud it is, it’s over for them.
[04:11:44] – [Warren]:
The last chapter is unbelievable—starts with Jewish gangsters. The joke hides that they’re killers, not just comedians. It covers American gangsters.
[04:12:08] – [Striker]:
I was shocked how they shot the Romanov family, then three Jews looted their diamonds—missing jewelry, probably in a Rothschild vault.
[04:12:30] – [Warren]:
They talk about political assassinations—Count Stürgkh in Austria-Hungary, shot by Friedrich Adler, son of the Austrian Social Democracy founder. Two years later, the state collapsed. Many big, powerful people I’d never heard of, killed by Jews—like a Hungarian, Tisza.
[04:13:12] – [Striker]:
That’s why they passed the 1924 Immigration Act—not racial, but because Jews kept murdering people, all Eastern European immigrants.
[04:13:37] – [Warren]:
They touch on Jewish ritual murder—
…an ancestor of the rebbe. The 1911 Kiev case, Andrei Yushchinsky, 13, found in a cave, tortured to death, blood drained—a sweet kid. Testimony says he was with playmates near the Sazhev factory when Beilis and two other Jews startled them. The kids ran, but Beilis seized Yushchinsky, dragged him to the factory. The trial found the crime but not the criminal. Haaretz calls it a blood libel, says they were acquitted. But they had unlimited means, public sympathy, police, and judicial support—yet couldn’t prove innocence, which proves guilt. After the Bolsheviks took power, everyone involved—judges, prosecutors, officials—was shot without procedure. Beilis lived peacefully in Palestine with a martyr’s pension. Prosecutors Vipper, Shalitsky, court president Bolyrev, judges Yevashov, Vigura, and Justice Minister Ziglovitov fell to the Jewish Cheka’s bullets. Defense counsel Grusenberg and Sarundi were appointed to the Senate by Kerensky’s half-Jewish government. They say this ritual blood sacrifice of a 13-year-old Russian boy, tortured unspeakably, is a symbol. It’s a representation of what they want to do to the goyim. When they got control of the Cheka and the secret state police, they were able to do it with impunity. They talk about the Jewish inhabitants of Kiev and how their numbers exploded. I know the Babi Yar thing is wildly exaggerated and mostly bullshit, but the Jews in Kiev were certainly rounded up and moved out by the Nazis. It made me think of how recently they had taken over the city.
[04:19:25] – [Striker]:
The numbers were unimaginable—about 30% of the population, 35% even. These were very rural countries at the time.
[04:19:35] – [Warren]:
The book says:
The numbers say it all. Jewry has besieged and finally conquered Kiev. They’ve won the breakthrough battle.
[04:19:42] – [Striker]:
Like Warsaw in 1938 or 1939, which was 30 or 40% Jewish. All the major cities of Eastern Europe before World War II were like that—Lithuania, Poland, Romania. Codreanu writes about this. People who romanticize being peasants were intellectually disarmed for what awaited them. You had urban, bloodthirsty, powerful Jews and illiterate Slavic peasants, slaughtered like sheep. It was unbelievable. They had no way to fight back. I suspect the Katyn Forest massacre was to prevent the Polish elite from siding with the Nazis.
[04:20:46] – [Warren]:
What’s amazing is they predict hostage murder and Jews killing helpless victims on a mass scale through the Cheka. This book, written in 1937, came before Katyn Forest—everyone who died there was still alive then. It’s hard to place this on the World War II timeline, but so much feels like today. Before October 7th, people might’ve thought the mass murder chapter was confined to early Russia, but now Israel aligns perfectly with it. The book states:
In the act of ritual murder, the Jew kills his victim in representation of all non-Jews over whom he does not yet have power. In the Cheka murder, he makes real his ritual. The murder of a hostage is secularized ritual murder. Cheka murder is mass ritual murder actualized. The ritual murder is an anticipated and vicariously enjoyed Cheka murder.
[04:22:20] – [Striker]:
That’s how we discussed it last week. Ritual murder is an impotent lashing out by Jews who feel confined by the goyim, killing a kid each year. Once they have power, they do it to millions.
[04:22:44] – [Warren]:
They’re doing it. The book mentions interesting figures—one is Count Mirbach, the German ambassador to Russia, assassinated by Jews. It’s a complicated story, but no one knows this stuff. They compare it to Wilhelm Gustloff, assassinated in Switzerland—later the ship named after him sank with 10,000 kids and women.
[04:23:45] – [Striker]:
This is why they killed Rathenau. After Jewish outrages in the Soviet Union, he brokered the Treaty of Rapallo to restore ties with the USSR. German nationalists saw it as him not caring about Germans because he was a Jew.
[04:24:03] – [Warren]:
There’s Peter Stolypin, a brilliant Russian who could’ve prevented the revolution with his reforms—agrarian changes, private land ownership for peasants. He was an antisemite, killed by a Jew before the revolution. Some say he could’ve averted what happened. The house where the tsar’s family was murdered was demolished in 1977, the site of this Jewish crime. Boris Yeltsin, chair of the local party, ordered it as the 60th anniversary of the revolution approached.
[04:26:26] – [Striker]:
The Orthodox Church sees the Romanovs as saints, so it was a shrine. On page 191, the Jew Bolsheviks killed the tsar’s family, then Jewish jewelers raided the house and stole their valuables. The sheer brazenness astonished me.
[04:27:07] – [Warren]:
It’s horrible. Written in 1937, they didn’t have all the details—later it emerged how gruesome it was. Yurovsky, Simon Golob, and a third one, under orders from Sverdlov, a powerful Jew no one’s heard of, did it. Sverdlov authorized the Romanov execution. He was one of the most powerful figures in the Soviet regime with Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin. He could’ve succeeded Lenin but died of Spanish flu in 1919. Historians say his death enabled Stalin’s rise—he was a natural candidate for Secretary General. These murderous Jewish Bolsheviks I’d never heard of.
[04:29:05] – [Striker]:
Imagine blaming Russians for Bolshevism—retarded Ukrainian nationalists do that, while descendants of these guys run Ukraine.
[04:29:08] – [Warren]:
Go on Wikipedia and read the slaughter of the tsar’s family. The father died, the young girls were still alive, shot as the room filled with smoke. One daughter survived longest as her family lay dead.
[04:29:41] – [Striker]:
Think of the parallels to Gaza. The world saw it and thought, “This is what Jews do with power?” People who talk human rights and antiracism kill thousands of children—it blew minds globally. In the 1920s, people thought Jews would get away with it and do it worldwide. They were wrong—it boomeranged back.
[04:30:50] – [Warren]:
These beautiful people who loved each other—the triggerman, a Jew, was scum. The bodies were robbed of valuables and jewelry, dismembered, doused with gasoline, and burned in the Four Brothers’ mine shaft. Officially, they were killed during evacuation. Yurovsky, a jeweler, played a decisive role, guided by greed. After moving the family to Ekaterinburg—renamed after Sverdlov—he let them sell jewelry to his friend Krumnos, learning they had jewels of inestimable value, like Faberge eggs. Rumors of a revolutionary court or monarchist rescue worried him. With commissars Beloborodov and Goloshchyokin, he executed the family to get their jewelry, sharing the booty with Golob and Krumnos. Settings were destroyed. Golob, in Ekaterinburg during the murder, heard shots and screams. Yurovsky said not all daughters died from salvos—soldiers bayoneted them as they fought back. Three Jewish jewelers gathered like carrion birds for the loot of a 300-year dynasty.
The book calls them Jewish robbery murderers and ghouls, devils incarnate, not revolutionaries or assassins—hatred like in The Money Kings. Here’s the murderer—one daughter was still alive as her family, including the little boy, lay dead, stabbed with bayonets. I’m glad the Nazis came in and liquidated these commissars on sight—how many lives were saved? Hitler signed off on it.
[04:35:08] – [Striker]:
It thinned out the Jewish elite in Russia. Stalin probably thought, “Thank you, Hitler.”
[04:35:16] – [Warren]:
It’s a great book—The Jew as Criminal by Jay Keller and Dr. Hanns Andersen, published 1937. Not sanguinary, not calling for action, just an honest, academic look.